PolymarketEth is good if you flip the chart upside down
Eth is good if you flip the chart upside down
Tilts参与话题 1消息总数 29
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 29 条，显示第 1-29 条11.5$
11.5$
Jessica if you give your opinion on starmer i’ll tip you 10$
Jessica if you give your opinion on starmer i’ll tip you 10$
Political joke
Political joke
Alt right
Alt right
https://tenor.com/view/cat-panic-anxiety-scared-cats-gif-27482371
https://tenor.com/view/cat-panic-anxiety-scared-cats-gif-27482371
Holy shit i fullported 200$ bucks!!!!!
Holy shit i fullported 200$ bucks!!!!!
SexyEbony69
SexyEbony69
Yes i’m going to waiting for the bank to approve the mortgage on my house
Yes i’m going to waiting for the bank to approve the mortgage on my house
I missed my dopamine spikes arguing in this chat
I missed my dopamine spikes arguing in this chat
What do you think negative forms mean?
What do you think negative forms mean?
Cuz i’m a jw
Cuz i’m a jw
Again, the rules include policy matters as long as they are not negative forms and include disparaging words
Again, the rules include policy matters as long as they are not negative forms and include disparaging words
Lol you are on No
Lol you are on No
He’s weak or he’s bad are not!
He’s weak or he’s bad are not!
“He’s not good”, “he’s doesn’t knows anything”, “he’s not the best” are all negative forms
“He’s not good”, “he’s doesn’t knows anything”, “he’s not the best” are all negative forms
He’s weak it’s not a negative firm lol
He’s weak it’s not a negative firm lol
NEGATIVE FORMS
NEGATIVE FORMS
****Negative forms******used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count.
****Negative forms******used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count.
Very bad?
Very bad?
Weak?
Weak?
——Without——
——Without——
“Policy disagreements *without* disparaging language won’t count”
“Policy disagreements *without* disparaging language won’t count”
Rules include policy lol
Rules include policy lol
“He’s weak”
“He’s weak”
I legit don’t lol
I legit don’t lol
??
??
Emphasis on the *weak*
Emphasis on the *weak*
someone should dispute https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-publicly-insult-by-may-31/will-donald-trump-publicly-insult-keir-starmer-by-may-31-2026#tdTWUfcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulaULPopSiA 3:58: “he’s very bad”, 4:30: “he’s weak Per the rules policy related “insults” count as long as they have disparaging language attached This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count. A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
someone should dispute https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-publicly-insult-by-may-31/will-donald-trump-publicly-insult-keir-starmer-by-may-31-2026#tdTWUfcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulaULPopSiA 3:58: “he’s very bad”, 4:30: “he’s weak Per the rules policy related “insults” count as long as they have disparaging language attached This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count. A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.