秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

哥伦比亚大选首轮结果市场被恶意提案延迟结算

2026-06-02 · Polymarket · 7 条相关讨论

Wizard 2026-06-02 07:30:15

<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578> can you look into a clarification on this? 7 disputes on Colombian first round results There is zero ambiguity, the results are well known, and even the losing candidate says the claims are fraud are unfounded. Yet, Thonker and 50Pence have held this market hostage and JessicaOnlyChild is agreeing with them. You've clarified some unjust P4s lately, so would request you look into this one as well. Thanks

<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578> can you look into a clarification on this? 7 disputes on Colombian first round results There is zero ambiguity, the results are well known, and even the losing candidate says the claims are fraud are unfounded. Yet, Thonker and 50Pence have held this market hostage and JessicaOnlyChild is agreeing with them. You've clarified some unjust P4s lately, so would request you look into this one as well. Thanks

LiquidatedDegen 2026-06-02 08:43:05

I agree, in fact, the losing candidate Cepeda said today that he accepts the results, and agrees that Petro (the current President)'s claims of fraud are unfounded. This is seriously hurting Polymarket's image in Colombia and especially all the new users that joined Polymarket because of the Colombian elections.

I agree, in fact, the losing candidate Cepeda said today that he accepts the results, and agrees that Petro (the current President)'s claims of fraud are unfounded. This is seriously hurting Polymarket's image in Colombia and especially all the new users that joined Polymarket because of the Colombian elections.

LiquidatedDegen 2026-06-02 08:44:45

There is not one mainstream media source claiming fraud. In fact, NYTimes, WSJ, Bloomberg, CNN, have all reported on the election results (I added those links in the dispute thread on UMA)

There is not one mainstream media source claiming fraud. In fact, NYTimes, WSJ, Bloomberg, CNN, have all reported on the election results (I added those links in the dispute thread on UMA)

Wizard 2026-06-02 08:50:34

On previous elections, claims of ambiguity were legitimate. For example, in Slovenia there was an actual legal challenge, which the courts looked at. Here, it's just a sore loser crying and not challenging the actual results. It seems ludicrous to me to keep this open and scam proposers when there is zero ambiguity who won.

On previous elections, claims of ambiguity were legitimate. For example, in Slovenia there was an actual legal challenge, which the courts looked at. Here, it's just a sore loser crying and not challenging the actual results. It seems ludicrous to me to keep this open and scam proposers when there is zero ambiguity who won.

Andy 2026-06-02 08:58:38

Holding a market hostage when there is no ambiguity as claimed by the disputers makes no sense. All I have to do is look out the window and see streets full of people celebrating the results. <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

Holding a market hostage when there is no ambiguity as claimed by the disputers makes no sense. All I have to do is look out the window and see streets full of people celebrating the results. <@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>

Basenji 2026-06-02 09:02:39

There's 0 ambiguity, The results have been aknoledged by Cepeda already. There's no reason to keep this unresolved. This makes no sense. Even if Petro does not agree it is all political claims and he can't do anything

There's 0 ambiguity, The results have been aknoledged by Cepeda already. There's no reason to keep this unresolved. This makes no sense. Even if Petro does not agree it is all political claims and he can't do anything

Basenji 2026-06-02 09:04:22

Petro is not the legal authority to decide the results. And all the Colombian institutions already provided evidence and declarations that everything is legal and clear. Even international obervers and OEA electoral mission certified it. I provided all the evidence but this JessicaOnlyChild just decided to agree with the disputers without providing any reason... Looks rigged

Petro is not the legal authority to decide the results. And all the Colombian institutions already provided evidence and declarations that everything is legal and clear. Even international obervers and OEA electoral mission certified it. I provided all the evidence but this JessicaOnlyChild just decided to agree with the disputers without providing any reason... Looks rigged