what are the arguments for no here?
what are the arguments for no here?
2026-06-05 · Polymarket · 28 条相关讨论
what are the arguments for no here?
what are the arguments for no here?
the word "orders"?
the word "orders"?
first clause: review process for the public release - not been met. second clause: A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. - not been met. the rest is self-explanatory
first clause: review process for the public release - not been met. second clause: A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. - not been met. the rest is self-explanatory
<@744559907944005634> wtf why you didn’t give any signal on this Ramanujan
<@744559907944005634> wtf why you didn’t give any signal on this Ramanujan
> A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. They are creating a process to review, but it's voluntary. > [...] or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. but here they are selected for review by voluntary asks, that's also a method right?
> A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. They are creating a process to review, but it's voluntary. > [...] or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. but here they are selected for review by voluntary asks, that's also a method right?
the review process doesn't concern the public release.
the review process doesn't concern the public release.
its only for unreleased models
its only for unreleased models
A qualifying review process may apply to a) artificial intelligence models generally, b) only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or c) to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. Where does it say models that elect to join this process? All 3 criteria require US gvt discretion
A qualifying review process may apply to a) artificial intelligence models generally, b) only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or c) to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. Where does it say models that elect to join this process? All 3 criteria require US gvt discretion
wow
wow
the government has selected models that want to voluntarily partipacte
the government has selected models that want to voluntarily partipacte
I don't think you understand what discretion means
I don't think you understand what discretion means
and its under b, frontier models
and its under b, frontier models
Nah the EO doesn’t meet reso because the companies haven’t allowing the US gov to generate all the anime big bitty bitches, so can’t go yes just yet
Nah the EO doesn’t meet reso because the companies haven’t allowing the US gov to generate all the anime big bitty bitches, so can’t go yes just yet
it is specifically for unreleased models
it is specifically for unreleased models
The rule has no requirements. review of unreleased models qualifies
The rule has no requirements. review of unreleased models qualifies
I think also the entire EO gets undermined in a couple paragraphs, like straight walks back on a lot of what it aims to do on the surface
I think also the entire EO gets undermined in a couple paragraphs, like straight walks back on a lot of what it aims to do on the surface
Right now if you go to government and ask them if they want to review your model before release, there is no process in place, it is ad-hoc. In the future, there will be an established process.
Right now if you go to government and ask them if they want to review your model before release, there is no process in place, it is ad-hoc. In the future, there will be an established process.
doesnt have to be mandatory
doesnt have to be mandatory
is there now a process for frontier models to be reveiewed prior to release?
is there now a process for frontier models to be reveiewed prior to release?
none of which falls under the categories specified under the 2nd clause
none of which falls under the categories specified under the 2nd clause