sure enjoy losing free money on no rebases on 'house of all finance'
sure enjoy losing free money on no rebases on 'house of all finance'
2026-06-10 · Hyperliquid · 213 条相关讨论
sure enjoy losing free money on no rebases on 'house of all finance'
sure enjoy losing free money on no rebases on 'house of all finance'
lol spacex market on tradexyz really big L, nance won this battle fr
lol spacex market on tradexyz really big L, nance won this battle fr
trade.xyz's handling of this matter is dishonest and disappointing.
trade.xyz's handling of this matter is dishonest and disappointing.
basically nance won by rebasing, leaving arb trade (loser on hl longs). sharp traders arbed ity by longing nance and shorting hl
basically nance won by rebasing, leaving arb trade (loser on hl longs). sharp traders arbed ity by longing nance and shorting hl
Over 90% of SPCX users were long, meaning these HyperLiquid + Trade.xyz users all suffered a 10% loss. Trade.xyz was the first exchange to list and stated 11.87B shares, but ironically, it was the only exchange that did nothing.
Over 90% of SPCX users were long, meaning these HyperLiquid + Trade.xyz users all suffered a 10% loss. Trade.xyz was the first exchange to list and stated 11.87B shares, but ironically, it was the only exchange that did nothing.
* Almost no communication with their users * Initially listed 11.87B shares, then secretly deleted them * the docs says nothing whether rebase or NOT. However, even if we declare no rebase, it's still a huge failure for both TradexYZ and the users. * Still Didn't clearly explain how stock splits would be handled. No rebase = No stock splits = GG? * The only exchange that did nothing * Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notion
* Almost no communication with their users * Initially listed 11.87B shares, then secretly deleted them * the docs says nothing whether rebase or NOT. However, even if we declare no rebase, it's still a huge failure for both TradexYZ and the users. * Still Didn't clearly explain how stock splits would be handled. No rebase = No stock splits = GG? * The only exchange that did nothing * Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notion
it does say 'market-implied expected price per share', with a reference of 11.87b shares.
it does say 'market-implied expected price per share', with a reference of 11.87b shares.
People trade market cap and not share price. Share price makes zero sense without marketcap.
People trade market cap and not share price. Share price makes zero sense without marketcap.
the tweet is still live guys, why do you say it will not be adjusted, other platforms are also adjusting it slowly
the tweet is still live guys, why do you say it will not be adjusted, other platforms are also adjusting it slowly
haha "11.87B " was stated in their doc, then secretly deleted
haha "11.87B " was stated in their doc, then secretly deleted
https://x.com/Aster_DEX/status/2064341339949732263 aster rebaseing
https://x.com/Aster_DEX/status/2064341339949732263 aster rebaseing
yeah hence asking why would trade xyz not rebase
yeah hence asking why would trade xyz not rebase
The guy from tradexyz said it will not.
The guy from tradexyz said it will not.
maybe they are shprt?
maybe they are shprt?
bro can you pls point me to that chat or screenshot?
bro can you pls point me to that chat or screenshot?
'market implied'
'market implied'
This is what they were showing previously on UI.
This is what they were showing previously on UI.
Market Cap was clearly mentioned on website and we were trading this only. How can they suddenly remove it without any X notice. This is weird but I have confidence in HL and TradeXyz team. They'll find a solution.
Market Cap was clearly mentioned on website and we were trading this only. How can they suddenly remove it without any X notice. This is weird but I have confidence in HL and TradeXyz team. They'll find a solution.
'reference' lol it actually says it right there "They do not represent a fair value or guaranteed market capitalization of an underlying issuer" "The final number of fully diluted shares or market cap of an issuer may differ materially from any reference values"
'reference' lol it actually says it right there "They do not represent a fair value or guaranteed market capitalization of an underlying issuer" "The final number of fully diluted shares or market cap of an issuer may differ materially from any reference values"
disingenuous and just playing word games.
disingenuous and just playing word games.