Hyperliquidcannot send hyperunit dot xyz link, it says "That link is not allowed" Could someone make it allowed?
cannot send hyperunit dot xyz link, it says "That link is not allowed" Could someone make it allowed?
Rebel Hermits参与话题 4消息总数 65
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 65 条，显示第 1-50 条in a support ticket, They told me it will be settled and redeployed.
in a support ticket, They told me it will be settled and redeployed.
When modifying an order’s price or quantity, pressing Enter should be handled as Confirm.
When modifying an order’s price or quantity, pressing Enter should be handled as Confirm.
Is there a better way to batch get funding rate history of last 1h for a batched coins? the current "Retrieve historical funding rates" api is retrieving coins one by one, so it easily hits 429.
Is there a better way to batch get funding rate history of last 1h for a batched coins? the current "Retrieve historical funding rates" api is retrieving coins one by one, so it easily hits 429.
L1 is congested. Rate limited based on master account maker share. What happened?
L1 is congested. Rate limited based on master account maker share. What happened?
try https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade?hloa=<your address>
try https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade?hloa=<your address>
I can help by providing a python code here and try to rescue. But dont accept any DMs, we can be public
I can help by providing a python code here and try to rescue. But dont accept any DMs, we can be public
use API to transfer your HYPE to another wallet controlled by u immdiately when the time u recieved HYPE in your spot account. and don't accept any DM and friend requests, all scammers
use API to transfer your HYPE to another wallet controlled by u immdiately when the time u recieved HYPE in your spot account. and don't accept any DM and friend requests, all scammers
Plus $200~$300 aws public data transfer fee 😂
Plus $200~$300 aws public data transfer fee 😂
aws 128GiB on tokyo $710 / month, on demand cost $447 / month for reserved cost,
aws 128GiB on tokyo $710 / month, on demand cost $447 / month for reserved cost,
https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2064467412489994699 TradeXYZ is not a clear market, don't trade on the perps that the 3rd party HIP-3 deploys if it is not clear. > contracts are price-based perpetual contracts that track the market-implied expected price of one share of Class A or common stock. TradeXYZ saying this. This applies to equities too? Like if NVDA stock splits 10:1 every longer just gets liquidated.
https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2064467412489994699 TradeXYZ is not a clear market, don't trade on the perps that the 3rd party HIP-3 deploys if it is not clear. > contracts are price-based perpetual contracts that track the market-implied expected price of one share of Class A or common stock. TradeXYZ saying this. This applies to equities too? Like if NVDA stock splits 10:1 every longer just gets liquidated.
count, but 1/10
count, but 1/10
No promotional content here, pls
No promotional content here, pls
So it is not allowed discussing tradeXYZ here?
So it is not allowed discussing tradeXYZ here?
This guy is tradeXYZ guy , clearly Im doing more researchs than you guys.
This guy is tradeXYZ guy , clearly Im doing more researchs than you guys.
Thanks for your advice. I'm here pushing TradeXYZ to clarify it. In public Because trade xyz, as always, doesn't like to communicate publicly with everyone. I'm not the only one encountering issues with TradeXYZ. Is it forbidden to discuss TradeXYZ issues in #general? TradeXYZ is the largest third-party HIP-3 deployer on HyperLiquid, accounting for about 30% of HyperLiquid's volume. I feel obligated to remind everyone of the risks of an unclear market.
Thanks for your advice. I'm here pushing TradeXYZ to clarify it. In public Because trade xyz, as always, doesn't like to communicate publicly with everyone. I'm not the only one encountering issues with TradeXYZ. Is it forbidden to discuss TradeXYZ issues in #general? TradeXYZ is the largest third-party HIP-3 deployer on HyperLiquid, accounting for about 30% of HyperLiquid's volume. I feel obligated to remind everyone of the risks of an unclear market.
and seems <@1417225527978233886> refuses to clarify.
and seems <@1417225527978233886> refuses to clarify.
It is funny that their docs states nothing. All other exchanges at least say they MAY rebase. So tradyXYZ is not a cleared market now?
It is funny that their docs states nothing. All other exchanges at least say they MAY rebase. So tradyXYZ is not a cleared market now?
I was just using voice input, so you're telling me what will happen when there's a stock split? You're being so clear about it.
I was just using voice input, so you're telling me what will happen when there's a stock split? You're being so clear about it.
---- If Meta announces a 1:10 stock split tomorrow, and according to your wording it's "tracking the value of 1 share," then Meta's price will immediately drop to 1/10. Long positions will lose 9/10. Then you'll say it's because I didn't read the rule. So tell me, how exactly does TradeXYZ handle stock splits? 1. If TradeXYZ is a cleared market, then everyone is risking a significant loss due to the stock split. because TradeXYZ does not do rebase! 2. If TradeXYZ is an uncleared market, nobody knows what will happen with a stock split.
---- If Meta announces a 1:10 stock split tomorrow, and according to your wording it's "tracking the value of 1 share," then Meta's price will immediately drop to 1/10. Long positions will lose 9/10. Then you'll say it's because I didn't read the rule. So tell me, how exactly does TradeXYZ handle stock splits? 1. If TradeXYZ is a cleared market, then everyone is risking a significant loss due to the stock split. because TradeXYZ does not do rebase! 2. If TradeXYZ is an uncleared market, nobody knows what will happen with a stock split.
Yes, TradeXYZ is an unclear market. They didn't explain it clearly from the beginning. They started by saying 11.87 billion, giving the impression that a base exchange rate was needed to attract buyers. Then they secretly changed all the documentation and UI, removing everything without any announcement. Isn't that an unclear market? Isn't that a broken system? They playing word game. > how stock splits of listed equities are handled, we have not seen thus far trade xyz is definitely an unclear market.
Yes, TradeXYZ is an unclear market. They didn't explain it clearly from the beginning. They started by saying 11.87 billion, giving the impression that a base exchange rate was needed to attract buyers. Then they secretly changed all the documentation and UI, removing everything without any announcement. Isn't that an unclear market? Isn't that a broken system? They playing word game. > how stock splits of listed equities are handled, we have not seen thus far trade xyz is definitely an unclear market.
As someone said no rebase=no handling for stock split. this model is completely broken.
As someone said no rebase=no handling for stock split. this model is completely broken.
Price per share, right? NVDA also tracks price per share, so when they slipt shares, you shouldn't re-based.
Price per share, right? NVDA also tracks price per share, so when they slipt shares, you shouldn't re-based.
If they're not guilty, why don't tradexyz fix it to a correct share price? Why not rebate it? Why not protect users instead of secretly removing it? And secretly changing the wording—isn't that a clear sign of a guilty conscience? Then tradexyz play word games with us, saying it's an implied price per share. Why didn't you say that from the beginning? Why didn't you make it clear when it first launched? Why did you release 11.787B to attract everyone when it first launched? We have screenshots; what do you have to say? You're just trying to whitewash it. In my opinion, this third-party deployer is dishonest.
If they're not guilty, why don't tradexyz fix it to a correct share price? Why not rebate it? Why not protect users instead of secretly removing it? And secretly changing the wording—isn't that a clear sign of a guilty conscience? Then tradexyz play word games with us, saying it's an implied price per share. Why didn't you say that from the beginning? Why didn't you make it clear when it first launched? Why did you release 11.787B to attract everyone when it first launched? We have screenshots; what do you have to say? You're just trying to whitewash it. In my opinion, this third-party deployer is dishonest.
trade.xyz first used shares priced at 11.87 billion and a so-called disclaimer to entice people to buy. Then they secretly removed the 11.87 billion without even a notice, which is simply a guilty conscience.
trade.xyz first used shares priced at 11.87 billion and a so-called disclaimer to entice people to buy. Then they secretly removed the 11.87 billion without even a notice, which is simply a guilty conscience.
It seems you guys still prefer playing word games to discussing the underlying mechanisms. Okay, then, let's continue with the word games. * Trade XYZ is dishonest in this regard; * they once wrote "11.87" then secretly changed it, * secretly deleted it from the document, * and secretly altered the wording. * secretly deleted 11.87b from UI * not even one annoucement * They just don't communicate properly with everyone.
It seems you guys still prefer playing word games to discussing the underlying mechanisms. Okay, then, let's continue with the word games. * Trade XYZ is dishonest in this regard; * they once wrote "11.87" then secretly changed it, * secretly deleted it from the document, * and secretly altered the wording. * secretly deleted 11.87b from UI * not even one annoucement * They just don't communicate properly with everyone.
If you say that, then we can't have a conversation, if you just want to bury your head in the sand. Everyone calls it SPCX, they're all SPACEEX stocks, and you say TradeXYZ is different. But the reality is that if this mechanism continues, nobody will open a long position on TradeXYZ anymore. I sincerely hope you will understand the market and its rules before making any comments.
If you say that, then we can't have a conversation, if you just want to bury your head in the sand. Everyone calls it SPCX, they're all SPACEEX stocks, and you say TradeXYZ is different. But the reality is that if this mechanism continues, nobody will open a long position on TradeXYZ anymore. I sincerely hope you will understand the market and its rules before making any comments.
In most IPOs, implied shares count are enlarged and enlarged. So other exchanges will rebase down the price. all long positions will lose 20% of their notional value
In most IPOs, implied shares count are enlarged and enlarged. So other exchanges will rebase down the price. all long positions will lose 20% of their notional value
Let's not debate reading or comprehension The fact is * All other exchanges will rebase * Trade xyz will not rebase * all long position users lost 10% In future pre-ipo perps, if this situation continues 1. a new pre-ipo , for example, OPENAI, is listed 2. all All other exchanges rebase 20% OPENAI 3. all long positions will lose 20% of their notional value That will be definite So nobody will open long position on trade.xyz again.
Let's not debate reading or comprehension The fact is * All other exchanges will rebase * Trade xyz will not rebase * all long position users lost 10% In future pre-ipo perps, if this situation continues 1. a new pre-ipo , for example, OPENAI, is listed 2. all All other exchanges rebase 20% OPENAI 3. all long positions will lose 20% of their notional value That will be definite So nobody will open long position on trade.xyz again.
continue play word game
continue play word game
SPCX pre-ipo perps deployed by a 3rd party deployer called **trade.xyz** made all long position users lost 10% because of the wrong disclose of the total shares While all other exchanges rebased their SPCX pre-ipo perps protecting their users not losing any. This will became a history and everybody will remember
SPCX pre-ipo perps deployed by a 3rd party deployer called **trade.xyz** made all long position users lost 10% because of the wrong disclose of the total shares While all other exchanges rebased their SPCX pre-ipo perps protecting their users not losing any. This will became a history and everybody will remember
* Please carefully open positions on pre-IPO stocks on trade.xyz. * All other exchanges will rebase in case of a stock total shares is wrong, but trade.xyz will not. * This can cause huge losses in case of a stock capitalization error. For example, on SPCX (all long position users lost 10%). (not caused by tradexyz,but resulted in) * trade xyz is 3rd party deployer, permissionlessly deployed pre-IPO stocks on HL * perpetual future is not stock share
* Please carefully open positions on pre-IPO stocks on trade.xyz. * All other exchanges will rebase in case of a stock total shares is wrong, but trade.xyz will not. * This can cause huge losses in case of a stock capitalization error. For example, on SPCX (all long position users lost 10%). (not caused by tradexyz,but resulted in) * trade xyz is 3rd party deployer, permissionlessly deployed pre-IPO stocks on HL * perpetual future is not stock share
Yeah we're all do it for HL users. cheers.
Yeah we're all do it for HL users. cheers.
Which statement I'm saying is wrong?
Which statement I'm saying is wrong?
So let me do it for all HL users. To all HL users: Please carefully open positions on pre-IPO stocks on trade.xyz. All other exchanges will rebase in case of a stock total shares is wrong, but trade.xyz will not. This can cause huge losses in case of a stock capitalization error. For example, on SPCX (all long position users lost 10%). I don't have FUD; I'm stating facts.
So let me do it for all HL users. To all HL users: Please carefully open positions on pre-IPO stocks on trade.xyz. All other exchanges will rebase in case of a stock total shares is wrong, but trade.xyz will not. This can cause huge losses in case of a stock capitalization error. For example, on SPCX (all long position users lost 10%). I don't have FUD; I'm stating facts.
again, you and trade xyz can continue play word game but not choose protect users Yes, yes, yes, TradeXYZ is right. All other rebase exchanges are wrong; they protected their users. TradeXYZ caused all long positions to lose 10%. That's a fact. Whether you defend it or not, I will warn no one should open long positions on TradeXYZ's pre-IPO anymore. It's ridiculous like clown 🤡. So I'm not buying stock . If NVDA announce stock split 3->1 tmr, the price will go from 205 to 68?
again, you and trade xyz can continue play word game but not choose protect users Yes, yes, yes, TradeXYZ is right. All other rebase exchanges are wrong; they protected their users. TradeXYZ caused all long positions to lose 10%. That's a fact. Whether you defend it or not, I will warn no one should open long positions on TradeXYZ's pre-IPO anymore. It's ridiculous like clown 🤡. So I'm not buying stock . If NVDA announce stock split 3->1 tmr, the price will go from 205 to 68?
https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2056159562487767356 When you buy stocks, you obviously need to know the total number of shares outstanding. When the total number of shares is incorrectly disclosed, only TradeXYZ fails to correct it (rebase), causing losses for all users. This is truly ironic.
https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2056159562487767356 When you buy stocks, you obviously need to know the total number of shares outstanding. When the total number of shares is incorrectly disclosed, only TradeXYZ fails to correct it (rebase), causing losses for all users. This is truly ironic.
This is your understanding today:On the first day of SPCX's launch, TradeXYZ explicitly stated 11.87B. Of course I'm unhappy with this result, so all long positions on SPCX on HL lost 10%. Who's happy about that? This is something that could have been done well through communication and mechanisms. Other exchanges did it well. Only TradeXYZ didn't. Why can't I criticize them?
This is your understanding today:On the first day of SPCX's launch, TradeXYZ explicitly stated 11.87B. Of course I'm unhappy with this result, so all long positions on SPCX on HL lost 10%. Who's happy about that? This is something that could have been done well through communication and mechanisms. Other exchanges did it well. Only TradeXYZ didn't. Why can't I criticize them?
TradeXYZ is dishonest in disclosing total shares.
TradeXYZ is dishonest in disclosing total shares.
This isn't fud. This is a fact. > TradeXYZ is the only exchange that caused all long positions to lose 10%. If this mechanism remains unchanged, any situation where a rebase is needed but isn't implemented will likely result in losses for long position holders in subsequent pre-IPOs.
This isn't fud. This is a fact. > TradeXYZ is the only exchange that caused all long positions to lose 10%. If this mechanism remains unchanged, any situation where a rebase is needed but isn't implemented will likely result in losses for long position holders in subsequent pre-IPOs.
switch off the slow mode before we talk and debate, otherwise you'll just keep firing off like a machine gun. Since you have no interest / no position in it, why are you stopping us from protecting our rightful rights? That's a fact: TradeXYZ is the only exchange that caused all long positions to lose 10%.
switch off the slow mode before we talk and debate, otherwise you'll just keep firing off like a machine gun. Since you have no interest / no position in it, why are you stopping us from protecting our rightful rights? That's a fact: TradeXYZ is the only exchange that caused all long positions to lose 10%.
11.87b is wrong. clearly. Yes, yes, yes, TradeXYZ is right. All other rebase exchanges are wrong; they protected their users. TradeXYZ caused all long positions to lose 10%. That's a fact. Whether you defend it or not, no one will open long positions on TradeXYZ's pre-IPO anymore. It's ridiculous.
11.87b is wrong. clearly. Yes, yes, yes, TradeXYZ is right. All other rebase exchanges are wrong; they protected their users. TradeXYZ caused all long positions to lose 10%. That's a fact. Whether you defend it or not, no one will open long positions on TradeXYZ's pre-IPO anymore. It's ridiculous.
NVDA also states price per share --- Only trade.xyz got the total number of shares wrong but did nothing. OKX rebaseed, Binance rebaseed, and Aster rebaseed. Trade.xyz and people like us who open long positions on Trade.xyz really look like clowns. 🤡
NVDA also states price per share --- Only trade.xyz got the total number of shares wrong but did nothing. OKX rebaseed, Binance rebaseed, and Aster rebaseed. Trade.xyz and people like us who open long positions on Trade.xyz really look like clowns. 🤡
Why all other exchange rebase? They protect users who long. lol > "price per share" So if NVDA announces 1 to 3 stock split tmr, trade xyz will do nothing . And all long postions lose 2/3 of their notional value.
Why all other exchange rebase? They protect users who long. lol > "price per share" So if NVDA announces 1 to 3 stock split tmr, trade xyz will do nothing . And all long postions lose 2/3 of their notional value.
Yes. But all other exchanges rebased, the fix the problem. trade xyz is the only exchange that did nothing Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notional saying 11.87b firstly , make people come and long, and not fix the problem NOT protect their users.
Yes. But all other exchanges rebased, the fix the problem. trade xyz is the only exchange that did nothing Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notional saying 11.87b firstly , make people come and long, and not fix the problem NOT protect their users.
90%+ SPCX people are long. Tradexyz Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notional and The only exchange that did nothing
90%+ SPCX people are long. Tradexyz Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notional and The only exchange that did nothing
We say these people scammer in real word. bro
We say these people scammer in real word. bro
"11.87B " was stated in their doc, then secretly deleted
"11.87B " was stated in their doc, then secretly deleted
disingenuous and just playing word games.
disingenuous and just playing word games.
The guy from tradexyz said it will not.
The guy from tradexyz said it will not.
第 1 / 2 页
下一页 →