秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

HIP-3 市场 Growth Mode 引发限速争议

2026-06-23 · Hyperliquid · 5 条相关讨论

Zwallfacer 2026-06-22 20:59:28

sharing an error message popping up trading .xyz pairs : '...WARNING ORDER REJECTED: {'status': 'err', 'response': 'Too many cumulative requests sent ...', while trading more than 1 USDC per request is it a bug ? might be related to the "growth mode" for .xyz pairs with <10% of trading volume being computed

sharing an error message popping up trading .xyz pairs : '...WARNING ORDER REJECTED: {'status': 'err', 'response': 'Too many cumulative requests sent ...', while trading more than 1 USDC per request is it a bug ? might be related to the "growth mode" for .xyz pairs with <10% of trading volume being computed

Light 2026-06-22 21:23:26

When growth mode is activated for an HIP-3 perp, protocol fees, rebates, volume contributions, and L1 user rate limit contributions are reduced by 90%. https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees

When growth mode is activated for an HIP-3 perp, protocol fees, rebates, volume contributions, and L1 user rate limit contributions are reduced by 90%. https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees

Zwallfacer 2026-06-22 21:36:54

right, shouldn't the rule on "Address-based limits" be adapted ? currently results in liquidity providers being blocked at >10usdc per order

right, shouldn't the rule on "Address-based limits" be adapted ? currently results in liquidity providers being blocked at >10usdc per order

joeblau 2026-06-22 21:52:23

Can someone help me with how I can improve reliablity on my order submissions for HIP-3 markets?

Can someone help me with how I can improve reliablity on my order submissions for HIP-3 markets?

Thorbinator 2026-06-23 02:13:05

This isn't exactly the right channel to debate policy, but no. Growth mode is already a subsidy from the protocol, nodes, and peers; I'm not willing to further subsidize it by allowing 10x the transaction handling workload per dollar volume. If you're doing a trial run of your system before scaling committed capital, use https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/exchange-endpoint#reserve-additional-actions

This isn't exactly the right channel to debate policy, but no. Growth mode is already a subsidy from the protocol, nodes, and peers; I'm not willing to further subsidize it by allowing 10x the transaction handling workload per dollar volume. If you're doing a trial run of your system before scaling committed capital, use https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/exchange-endpoint#reserve-additional-actions