there is a history of sustained lies in rfq documentation. for example, even today, it still says `rfq_created` `creator_id` is always empty. i won't speculate on why this is, but i tend to trust behavior over documentation for the rfq subsystem. and whatever seems to be happening over the last few days makes me glad i decided to eschew it and just place resting orders directly on the orderbooks
there is a history of sustained lies in rfq documentation. for example, even today, it still says `rfq_created` `creator_id` is always empty. i won't speculate on why this is, but i tend to trust behavior over documentation for the rfq subsystem. and whatever seems to be happening over the last few days makes me glad i decided to eschew it and just place resting orders directly on the orderbooks