2026-06-26 · Polymarket · 22 条相关讨论
why was this event resolved as Haiti no?https://polymarket.com/event/world-cup-worst-placed-non-host-concacaf-nation-20260605201215810/will-panama-be-the-worst-placed-central-american-nation-in-the-2026-fifa-world-cup-20260605172810557
why was this event resolved as Haiti no?https://polymarket.com/event/world-cup-worst-placed-non-host-concacaf-nation-20260605201215810/will-panama-be-the-worst-placed-central-american-nation-in-the-2026-fifa-world-cup-20260605172810557
### UMA Resolution Proposal Request **Market Title:** World Cup: Worst-Placed Non-Host CONCACAF Nation **Polymarket Sub-Market Link:** Polymarket Event Link **UMA Proposal Link:** UMA Oracle Propose **Transaction Hash:** 0x65fef221b1603b81f715ac8d9b13b046ecd60bb39d7f9d49c53a57d2e870d9f1 (Event Index: 4) **Proposed Resolution Value:** **NO** (For the Curaçao sub-market) #### Detailed Rationale & Evidence: According to the official resolution rules for the "Worst-Placed Non-Host CONCACAF Nation" market group, positions are determined by the final performance and points accumulated during the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage. The group stage matches for both Curaçao (Group E) and Haiti (Group C) have officially concluded with the following final records: 1. **Curaçao (Group E):** * **Matches Played:** 3 (vs. Germany, Ecuador, Côte d'Ivoire) * **Record:** 0 Wins, 1 Draw, 2 Losses * **Total Points:** **1 Point** (earned via a 0-0 draw against Ecuador) * **Goal Difference:** -8 2. **Haiti (Group C):** * **Matches Played:** 3 * **Record:** 0 Wins, 0 Draws, 3 Losses * **Total Points:** **0 Points** * **Goal Difference:** -6 Because tournament tie-breakers prioritize total points earned above all else, Curaçao's **1 point** guarantees they finish ahead of Haiti's **0 points**. As a result, Curaçao mathematically cannot be the worst-placed non-host CONCACAF nation in the tournament. Therefore, the market asking if Curaçao will be the worst-placed nation must definitively resolve to **No**. #### Verified Reference Sources: * **Official FIFA World Cup Group E Standings (Curaçao):** FIFA Tournament Standings * **FOX Sports World Cup Group Stage Tracker:** FOX Sports Standings https://oracle.uma.xyz/propose?project=Polymarket&transactionHash=0x65fef221b1603b81f715ac8d9b13b046ecd60bb39d7f9d49c53a57d2e870d9f1&eventIndex=4
### UMA Resolution Proposal Request **Market Title:** World Cup: Worst-Placed Non-Host CONCACAF Nation **Polymarket Sub-Market Link:** Polymarket Event Link **UMA Proposal Link:** UMA Oracle Propose **Transaction Hash:** 0x65fef221b1603b81f715ac8d9b13b046ecd60bb39d7f9d49c53a57d2e870d9f1 (Event Index: 4) **Proposed Resolution Value:** **NO** (For the Curaçao sub-market) #### Detailed Rationale & Evidence: According to the official resolution rules for the "Worst-Placed Non-Host CONCACAF Nation" market group, positions are determined by the final performance and points accumulated during the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage. The group stage matches for both Curaçao (Group E) and Haiti (Group C) have officially concluded with the following final records: 1. **Curaçao (Group E):** * **Matches Played:** 3 (vs. Germany, Ecuador, Côte d'Ivoire) * **Record:** 0 Wins, 1 Draw, 2 Losses * **Total Points:** **1 Point** (earned via a 0-0 draw against Ecuador) * **Goal Difference:** -8 2. **Haiti (Group C):** * **Matches Played:** 3 * **Record:** 0 Wins, 0 Draws, 3 Losses * **Total Points:** **0 Points** * **Goal Difference:** -6 Because tournament tie-breakers prioritize total points earned above all else, Curaçao's **1 point** guarantees they finish ahead of Haiti's **0 points**. As a result, Curaçao mathematically cannot be the worst-placed non-host CONCACAF nation in the tournament. Therefore, the market asking if Curaçao will be the worst-placed nation must definitively resolve to **No**. #### Verified Reference Sources: * **Official FIFA World Cup Group E Standings (Curaçao):** FIFA Tournament Standings * **FOX Sports World Cup Group Stage Tracker:** FOX Sports Standings https://oracle.uma.xyz/propose?project=Polymarket&transactionHash=0x65fef221b1603b81f715ac8d9b13b046ecd60bb39d7f9d49c53a57d2e870d9f1&eventIndex=4
same why Haiti resolved to no?
same why Haiti resolved to no?
the rule doén't count total points, it counts win > score hiti: 0 win, 2 scores cura: 0 win, 1 score
the rule doén't count total points, it counts win > score hiti: 0 win, 2 scores cura: 0 win, 1 score
This market will resolve in favor of the CONCACAF nation not hosting the tournament that is eliminated at the earliest stage (places lowest) in the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
This market will resolve in favor of the CONCACAF nation not hosting the tournament that is eliminated at the earliest stage (places lowest) in the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
that's false bro
that's false bro
is first by points
is first by points
second goals
second goals
if there's a tie, fewer wins
if there's a tie, fewer wins
can't see where it mentions to points
can't see where it mentions to points
place lowest
place lowest
you can see, that you're statement start with in case of draw
you can see, that you're statement start with in case of draw
you place higher in the classification if have more points
you place higher in the classification if have more points
looks clear
looks clear
Haiti was bad resolved
Haiti was bad resolved
or resolved in advance
or resolved in advance
so first criteria is who rank higher
so first criteria is who rank higher
both teams are on 4th, lowest place, this is a 1st tie, 2nd tie is 0 win
both teams are on 4th, lowest place, this is a 1st tie, 2nd tie is 0 win
just my opinion btw
just my opinion btw
makes no sense that you have more points, and it resolves as worst placed
makes no sense that you have more points, and it resolves as worst placed