Kalshi screwed up royally on "shutout" in the Turkiye vs USA game. I am on with Kalshi support right now disputing. Yes the strike is "shutout" and the closed caption says "shut out" but this is an open compound and qualifies as yes per the Kalshi rules.
Kalshi screwed up royally on "shutout" in the Turkiye vs USA game. I am on with Kalshi support right now disputing. Yes the strike is "shutout" and the closed caption says "shut out" but this is an open compound and qualifies as yes per the Kalshi rules.
I’m sorry but it’s a no. It’s a confusing outcome of course but there’s a substantive difference between shut out and shutout and only one form was included as the strike.
I’m sorry but it’s a no. It’s a confusing outcome of course but there’s a substantive difference between shut out and shutout and only one form was included as the strike.
Explain how I'm wrong.
Explain how I'm wrong.
But the strike is the singular word, so saying the uncompound form doesn't count
But the strike is the singular word, so saying the uncompound form doesn't count
Kalshi screwed up royally on "southside". I am on with Kalshi support right now disputing. Yes the strike is "southside" and the closed caption says "south side" but this is an closed compound and qualifies as no per the Kalshi rules.
Kalshi screwed up royally on "southside". I am on with Kalshi support right now disputing. Yes the strike is "southside" and the closed caption says "south side" but this is an closed compound and qualifies as no per the Kalshi rules.
Open compounds count when the strike is a singular word in the open compound.
Open compounds count when the strike is a singular word in the open compound.
<@184174248070348801>
Strike is "shut" and they say "shut out" -> YES
Strike is "shut" and they say "shutout" -> NO
Strike is "shutout" and they say "shut out" -> NO
That's what that rule is saying
<@184174248070348801>
Strike is "shut" and they say "shut out" -> YES
Strike is "shut" and they say "shutout" -> NO
Strike is "shutout" and they say "shut out" -> NO
That's what that rule is saying
Southside was a no by the rules imo but every other aspect pointed to Y so it went Y
Southside was a no by the rules imo but every other aspect pointed to Y so it went Y
by every other aspect do you mean price
by every other aspect do you mean price
Price, vibes. Vibes, price. I could repeat the two reasons indefinitely
Price, vibes. Vibes, price. I could repeat the two reasons indefinitely
What was the intention behind warner bros
What was the intention behind warner bros
Poly **ILLEGALLY** resolved yes, <@570563844678877196>
Poly **ILLEGALLY** resolved yes, <@570563844678877196>
Warner bros could go Y with Price, vibes. Vibes, price as the two reasons
Warner bros could go Y with Price, vibes. Vibes, price as the two reasons
https://tenor.com/view/indignation-jump-window-done-gif-3443826
https://tenor.com/view/indignation-jump-window-done-gif-3443826
So you support that technicality, even though the announcers intent was clearly referring to a shutout, but this unrelated rule makes sense too?
The strike can be a word and the speaker can say a completely different pronunciation of the word and it counts
Minor unintentional mispronunciations COUNT if context makes intent clear:
<word> is "Mamdani" → "Mandani" counts
So you support that technicality, even though the announcers intent was clearly referring to a shutout, but this unrelated rule makes sense too?
The strike can be a word and the speaker can say a completely different pronunciation of the word and it counts
Minor unintentional mispronunciations COUNT if context makes intent clear:
<word> is "Mamdani" → "Mandani" counts
Warner bros was a bad resolution IMO.
Warner bros was a bad resolution IMO.
ok! So either southside or warner bros resolution was bad!
ok! So either southside or warner bros resolution was bad!
The announcer's intent was to say "shut out" and he said "shut out"
The announcer's intent was to say "shut out" and he said "shut out"
He didn't mispronounce anything
He didn't mispronounce anything
I didn't say he mispronounced anything.
I didn't say he mispronounced anything.