<@1434925821667180728> This should be revised. non-fat is unambiguously not a compound word. It's formed by derivation. (The etymons are the prefix non and the word fat). Non-fat has **explicitly not counted** during a market on January 14th. That market **had the compound rule**.
<@1434925821667180728> This should be revised. non-fat is unambiguously not a compound word. It's formed by derivation. (The etymons are the prefix non and the word fat). Non-fat has **explicitly not counted** during a market on January 14th. That market **had the compound rule**.
It seems like you guys copied the Kalshi rules for some of this stuff
It seems like you guys copied the Kalshi rules for some of this stuff
pro-Palestine is also definitely not a compound word.
pro-Palestine is also definitely not a compound word.
If a word being an etymon in a hyphenated word counts, separated by hypens, then revise the rules to say that. But they certainly are not compound words as the rules here and on Kalshi **incorrectly** say.
If a word being an etymon in a hyphenated word counts, separated by hypens, then revise the rules to say that. But they certainly are not compound words as the rules here and on Kalshi **incorrectly** say.
Totally get the vibe the contract is going for, just should be more technically correct
Totally get the vibe the contract is going for, just should be more technically correct
Up to you guys how exactly to formulate it, but shouldn't be too hard
Up to you guys how exactly to formulate it, but shouldn't be too hard
Like, windmill is technically also an etymon in "windmilling", but wouldn't count, right
Like, windmill is technically also an etymon in "windmilling", but wouldn't count, right
So I think it should just say if the word is there, and isolated by hyphens, it counts
So I think it should just say if the word is there, and isolated by hyphens, it counts
which market had the hyphen problem?
which market had the hyphen problem?