U lgt just proved that you resolved it wrogly, because she wasnt declared as a winner, the match simply didnt happen, the other player was replaced. Your rules have flaws
U lgt just proved that you resolved it wrogly, because she wasnt declared as a winner, the match simply didnt happen, the other player was replaced. Your rules have flaws
That match has no winner look it up
That match has no winner look it up
U should resolve these as 50/50
U should resolve these as 50/50
The market was for the match between Antonia Ruzic vs Emma Raducanu. No other player can be substituted here, and there is no 50/50 settlement. Ruzic is the winner in this market according to our description: a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of withdrawal
The market was for the match between Antonia Ruzic vs Emma Raducanu. No other player can be substituted here, and there is no 50/50 settlement. Ruzic is the winner in this market according to our description: a player officially declared the winner of the match will be considered to have defeated the opponent, including in cases of withdrawal
I understand — I just think those are badly written rules. In a case like this the market should resolve 50/50 for better trader experience, since the match didn’t happen and there is no official winner.
I understand — I just think those are badly written rules. In a case like this the market should resolve 50/50 for better trader experience, since the match didn’t happen and there is no official winner.
Btw im not writing this because im salty, i had money on Ruzic so i won
Btw im not writing this because im salty, i had money on Ruzic so i won
I know this 😅
I know this 😅
Just think that you should change it for a better experience, polymarket has it like that
Just think that you should change it for a better experience, polymarket has it like that
I'll share your thoughts with the team, sure!
I'll share your thoughts with the team, sure!