Is the historical data cutoff date like a fr fr 100% actually the cut off date?
Is the historical data cutoff date like a fr fr 100% actually the cut off date?
2026-06-30 · Kalshi · 12 条相关讨论
Is the historical data cutoff date like a fr fr 100% actually the cut off date?
Is the historical data cutoff date like a fr fr 100% actually the cut off date?
Or just close to it
Or just close to it
I ask because the cutoff endpoint returns 2026-04-30T00:00:00Z right now
I ask because the cutoff endpoint returns 2026-04-30T00:00:00Z right now
but /markets gives you settled markets with a settlement_ts all the way back to 2026-04-26
but /markets gives you settled markets with a settlement_ts all the way back to 2026-04-26
Feels like you answered your own question?
Feels like you answered your own question?
of course, but when the api ref has language like
of course, but when the api ref has language like
only being the operative word
only being the operative word
Yeah, lots of misleading stuff in there. I think the API responses could be treated as more authoritative
Yeah, lots of misleading stuff in there. I think the API responses could be treated as more authoritative
for sure, not a huge deal either way, I've just been using the resp from the cutoff endpoint in my code when indexing, did a reindex and noticed some funkyness, so just wanted to confirm
for sure, not a huge deal either way, I've just been using the resp from the cutoff endpoint in my code when indexing, did a reindex and noticed some funkyness, so just wanted to confirm
easy enough fix
easy enough fix
I've seen the same trades show up in both the historical and current endpoints simultaneously, forget if they were just before or just after the cutoff
I've seen the same trades show up in both the historical and current endpoints simultaneously, forget if they were just before or just after the cutoff
ye, not sure how I didn't catch it the first time pulled data, but oh well, not a biggie
ye, not sure how I didn't catch it the first time pulled data, but oh well, not a biggie