gut feeling, I think this would probably lead to more confusion than benefits if it were to be added natively. (e.g. what if you get a partial fill above your minimum price parameter. do we just give you the partial fill?)
gut feeling, I think this would probably lead to more confusion than benefits if it were to be added natively. (e.g. what if you get a partial fill above your minimum price parameter. do we just give you the partial fill?)
just spitballing but my imagined behavior would be it would fill whatever it could between the minimum and limit price
just spitballing but my imagined behavior would be it would fill whatever it could between the minimum and limit price
so say you send a limit order for 100 buys at 0.9900 and a min price of 0.8500 as long as the best buy price was between 85-99 it would fill what it could. the more i draw it out the more complicated it sounds...
so say you send a limit order for 100 buys at 0.9900 and a min price of 0.8500 as long as the best buy price was between 85-99 it would fill what it could. the more i draw it out the more complicated it sounds...
Yeah, for your use case, if the price drops too low, you would prefer not to get any fills, right?
Yeah, for your use case, if the price drops too low, you would prefer not to get any fills, right?
Ideally. Say in the above scenario by the time the order reaches the engine the best buy is 0.6000 then it would simply cancel with no fills
Ideally. Say in the above scenario by the time the order reaches the engine the best buy is 0.6000 then it would simply cancel with no fills
But if there were 50 contracts available at a best buy of 0.8500 it would fill those and then cancel (assuming IOC)
But if there were 50 contracts available at a best buy of 0.8500 it would fill those and then cancel (assuming IOC)
Not sure it could work with GTC orders. Although I'm not sure it could work with any orders
Not sure it could work with GTC orders. Although I'm not sure it could work with any orders
definitely not gtc - that'd be a phantom order
definitely not gtc - that'd be a phantom order
actually not phantom, just wouldn't have any effect
actually not phantom, just wouldn't have any effect
This sounds like a more complex variation of your favorite question: 'I want to spend $50 and I want the Kalshi API to calculate the total number of shares for me based on the book when my order hits.' 😄
This sounds like a more complex variation of your favorite question: 'I want to spend $50 and I want the Kalshi API to calculate the total number of shares for me based on the book when my order hits.' 😄
i mean i guess in the sense that it is asking the api to do something it doesn't currently do
i mean i guess in the sense that it is asking the api to do something it doesn't currently do