Hello, I was talking all day with support after a market randomly went down in the middle of the day, the main page and order book was down all afternoon. There was no resolution or anything proposed, it just completely vanished. The market was finally re-listed hours later and somehow marked resolved despite the player 100% NOT retiring. How is this even remotely possible. The market in question is “NHL: Alex Ovechkin to Retire Before 2036-27 Season?”
https://polymarket.com/event/nhl-alex-ovechkin-to-retire-before-2026-27-season-20260629201520510
Hello, I was talking all day with support after a market randomly went down in the middle of the day, the main page and order book was down all afternoon. There was no resolution or anything proposed, it just completely vanished. The market was finally re-listed hours later and somehow marked resolved despite the player 100% NOT retiring. How is this even remotely possible. The market in question is “NHL: Alex Ovechkin to Retire Before 2036-27 Season?”
https://polymarket.com/event/nhl-alex-ovechkin-to-retire-before-2026-27-season-20260629201520510
The player has definitely not retired and there was no dispute window or outcome proposed prior to the page going down.
The player has definitely not retired and there was no dispute window or outcome proposed prior to the page going down.
How can you possibly resolve a retirement market to “YES” when the player has NOT retired, the market rules clearly state it will resolve to NO unless an official announcement is made, which unequivocally never occurred.
How can you possibly resolve a retirement market to “YES” when the player has NOT retired, the market rules clearly state it will resolve to NO unless an official announcement is made, which unequivocally never occurred.
you will be refunded
you will be refunded
The market should resolve to NO and YES should be refunded, he didn’t retire. I don’t want a refund, NO should be the resolution as he has not and will not retire. My position had already doubled
The market should resolve to NO and YES should be refunded, he didn’t retire. I don’t want a refund, NO should be the resolution as he has not and will not retire. My position had already doubled
If the market is removed, why is it resolved to Yes as at the time of removal, it is clearly NO. It’s also still clearly NO as he is not retiring
If the market is removed, why is it resolved to Yes as at the time of removal, it is clearly NO. It’s also still clearly NO as he is not retiring
So if you want to remove a market, how is NO not the resolution and YES is refunded
So if you want to remove a market, how is NO not the resolution and YES is refunded
they choose the cheaper side to refund
they choose the cheaper side to refund
in this case they resolved y as it was cheaper to refund n
in this case they resolved y as it was cheaper to refund n