great so like 4 hours warning for 0.25c tick sizes?
great so like 4 hours warning for 0.25c tick sizes?
2026-07-02 · Polymarket · 182 条相关讨论
great so like 4 hours warning for 0.25c tick sizes?
great so like 4 hours warning for 0.25c tick sizes?
do any other markets use quarter tick size? why not just 0.1?
do any other markets use quarter tick size? why not just 0.1?
"Why make stuff simple when we can make it complex? <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251> " My math teacher
"Why make stuff simple when we can make it complex? <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251> " My math teacher
🤯
🤯
new feature from mostafa,
new feature from mostafa,
<@1361217824776786031> Any hour, any hint on when it starts or we just to need to check when our code breaks?
<@1361217824776786031> Any hour, any hint on when it starts or we just to need to check when our code breaks?
I can't wait to see the new bugs this will cause.
I can't wait to see the new bugs this will cause.
this is so dumb, im guessing they give institutions more headsup and then we just get a few hours? wtf
this is so dumb, im guessing they give institutions more headsup and then we just get a few hours? wtf
Instead of being 55c 56c, It'll be 55.5c 55.75c on the books
Instead of being 55c 56c, It'll be 55.5c 55.75c on the books
Tomorrow UTC? Tomorrow ET? Tomorrow where ffs?
Tomorrow UTC? Tomorrow ET? Tomorrow where ffs?
This guy writes one message every month
This guy writes one message every month
tomorrow bro
tomorrow bro
never useful
never useful
Lol Fable 5 1 shotted the tick size update
Lol Fable 5 1 shotted the tick size update
Fable 5 reccomended it!?
Fable 5 reccomended it!?
yes
yes
what is it?? how to return normal digital?
what is it?? how to return normal digital?
This is a very strange decision! Who does this benefit? Everyone is used to working with standard numbers, just like the rest of the world! Please bring back standard numbers!
This is a very strange decision! Who does this benefit? Everyone is used to working with standard numbers, just like the rest of the world! Please bring back standard numbers!
<@1361217824776786031> Please bring back the normal 1-cent price increments for football markets. Previously, prices moved in simple steps like 44, 45, 46, etc., which was clear, familiar, and easy to work with. Now the prices move in 0.25 increments, like 44.25, 44.50, 44.75, 45, and so on. In my opinion, this makes football markets much less convenient and much harder to trade. Most people are used to standard 1-cent increments, and I honestly don’t see any real benefit in the new system. Please consider returning football markets to the previous 1-cent tick size.
<@1361217824776786031> Please bring back the normal 1-cent price increments for football markets. Previously, prices moved in simple steps like 44, 45, 46, etc., which was clear, familiar, and easy to work with. Now the prices move in 0.25 increments, like 44.25, 44.50, 44.75, 45, and so on. In my opinion, this makes football markets much less convenient and much harder to trade. Most people are used to standard 1-cent increments, and I honestly don’t see any real benefit in the new system. Please consider returning football markets to the previous 1-cent tick size.
<@1361217824776786031> Following the implementation of the new 0.25 rule, some world cup markets show now 100% after 99.75% (e.g. spread +5,5 Croatia). At least for low probability brackets, such as everything above 98%, I suggest to still use the 0.1 increments as the highest possibility of 99.9 is quite different from 99.75 for very unlikely events.
<@1361217824776786031> Following the implementation of the new 0.25 rule, some world cup markets show now 100% after 99.75% (e.g. spread +5,5 Croatia). At least for low probability brackets, such as everything above 98%, I suggest to still use the 0.1 increments as the highest possibility of 99.9 is quite different from 99.75 for very unlikely events.