2026-07-08 · Kalshi · 243 条相关讨论
Holy r word moment in the carney market lol
Holy r word moment in the carney market lol
Literal video exists of his media availability
Literal video exists of his media availability
if it wasn't livestreamed it wouldn't matter
if it wasn't livestreamed it wouldn't matter
but it apparently was
but it apparently was
bro just called novarex a re*ard
bro just called novarex a re*ard
https://klipy.com/gifs/caitvitwt-zaunvi-6
https://klipy.com/gifs/caitvitwt-zaunvi-6
why leak alpha instead of capitalizing on the inefficiency
why leak alpha instead of capitalizing on the inefficiency
Were you dropping 2k blocks at 53, out of curiosity?
Were you dropping 2k blocks at 53, out of curiosity?
It was not live streamed as far as I was waiting for the livestream...
It was not live streamed as far as I was waiting for the livestream...
apparently it was on cpac website
apparently it was on cpac website
but there's no evidence of that
but there's no evidence of that
also CPAC not a source agency
also CPAC not a source agency
All my $ is tied up.
All my $ is tied up.
Got what I could
Got what I could
damn what a nice guy
damn what a nice guy
(All my money isn’t in this market, to be clear)
(All my money isn’t in this market, to be clear)
I mean, I follow Carney pretty closely.
I mean, I follow Carney pretty closely.
I proposed this market.
I proposed this market.
eh
eh
it's not a lock
it's not a lock
if we followed rules closely this would be a DNQ + all N
if we followed rules closely this would be a DNQ + all N
I wouldn't be betting the house on Y here
I wouldn't be betting the house on Y here
precedent for non live streams counting = china tea thingy
precedent for non live streams counting = china tea thingy
holy ptsd
holy ptsd
That was streamed live, but with delay, I think.
That was streamed live, but with delay, I think.
p sure thats the same thing as not live streamed
p sure thats the same thing as not live streamed
do not get me going
do not get me going
This was streamed live, without a delay, I believe
This was streamed live, without a delay, I believe
you can premeire a youtube video pre-recorded and its the same thing etc
you can premeire a youtube video pre-recorded and its the same thing etc
Cspan straight up uploaded Caney's video.
Cspan straight up uploaded Caney's video.
that was different
that was different
it was streamed
it was streamed
but it was a stream of the recording a few mins later
but it was a stream of the recording a few mins later
the question here is whether you count a livestream from a non-SA
the question here is whether you count a livestream from a non-SA
because CPAC is "legit"
because CPAC is "legit"
if it was a random facebook stream it'd be clear DNQ
if it was a random facebook stream it'd be clear DNQ
China tea wasn't a source agency either. unless u mean the recording uploaded to Fox that happened later
China tea wasn't a source agency either. unless u mean the recording uploaded to Fox that happened later
it was
it was
because fox was a source agency
because fox was a source agency
and fox livestreamed it, albeit delayed
and fox livestreamed it, albeit delayed
.....
.....
there is no practical difference between a livestream that is delayed 10 seconds from realtime vs 5 minutes
there is no practical difference between a livestream that is delayed 10 seconds from realtime vs 5 minutes
where.
where.
it was livestreamed by fox
it was livestreamed by fox
It wasn't tho
It wasn't tho
It was recorded on a film camera
It was recorded on a film camera
I mean, for Carney, it literally wasn't livestreamed.
I mean, for Carney, it literally wasn't livestreamed.
8% no...
8% no...
china tea bilat
china tea bilat
no X post, no YT live stream. They post all Live streams from cpac on the x account.
no X post, no YT live stream. They post all Live streams from cpac on the x account.
and then livestreamed
and then livestreamed
Like, no livestrem before the event, no mess up because of reception etc.... it just wasn't. It was just uploaded post event.
Like, no livestrem before the event, no mess up because of reception etc.... it just wasn't. It was just uploaded post event.
a livestream is "recording on a film camera" that is encoded and streamed
a livestream is "recording on a film camera" that is encoded and streamed
there is always delay
there is always delay
30s vs 10 minutes shouldn't matter
30s vs 10 minutes shouldn't matter
This will count
This will count
it was conveyed as soon as practical as a stream
it was conveyed as soon as practical as a stream
which one is the real mitchieboi?
which one is the real mitchieboi?
Fv 95
Fv 95
I wouldn't say all.
I wouldn't say all.
But Carney? 100%.
But Carney? 100%.
Well, no, because they didn't this time.
Well, no, because they didn't this time.
Exactly.
Exactly.
i havent seen them miss carney tho.
i havent seen them miss carney tho.
I never miss Carney. I proposed this market. I know where to look for clips.
I never miss Carney. I proposed this market. I know where to look for clips.
then there's the question
then there's the question
if there is no hard evidence that it WAS streamed live
if there is no hard evidence that it WAS streamed live
was it even streamed lmao
was it even streamed lmao
i cant
i cant
<@445032403493322762> if there was no stream
<@445032403493322762> if there was no stream
do you think it should count
do you think it should count
I looked at CPAC, Global Mail, CBC, CTV, and all the usual suspects.
I looked at CPAC, Global Mail, CBC, CTV, and all the usual suspects.
for livestream? or what
for livestream? or what
I was up at 6am.
I was up at 6am.
local time.
local time.
I even looked at Anadolu, NATO media center, etc.
I even looked at Anadolu, NATO media center, etc.
Hmmm...
Hmmm...
did you check cpac for a livestream?
did you check cpac for a livestream?
Everything. I had screens lock and loaded.
Everything. I had screens lock and loaded.
They livestreamed it on cpac.ca and then reuploaded the cut version where there was no waiting before Carney's arrival (and actually included the portion before Carney says umbrella, which wasn't in the live stream and which would have been a separate fun cuck but is irrelevant for this time).
They livestreamed it on cpac.ca and then reuploaded the cut version where there was no waiting before Carney's arrival (and actually included the portion before Carney says umbrella, which wasn't in the live stream and which would have been a separate fun cuck but is irrelevant for this time).
When Carney goes abroad, he would at least have CBC, and CPAC with him.
When Carney goes abroad, he would at least have CBC, and CPAC with him.
so now the question
so now the question
Which interview do you think counts? What is your view on this? If you proposed it, what was your intention?
Which interview do you think counts? What is your view on this? If you proposed it, what was your intention?
can kalshi resolve off a video if there was no evidence that it was streamed
can kalshi resolve off a video if there was no evidence that it was streamed
every carney livestream is announced on the X. EVERY.
every carney livestream is announced on the X. EVERY.
go look,
go look,
wut was your intention?
wut was your intention?
pretty clear to me that the 2 mins doesn't count and the second one does
pretty clear to me that the 2 mins doesn't count and the second one does
I propose Carney market, because he does these pressers early in the twilight hours, and it is often very reliable.
I propose Carney market, because he does these pressers early in the twilight hours, and it is often very reliable.
two separate events on calendar
two separate events on calendar
it'd be like counting trump greeting at car for a bilat
it'd be like counting trump greeting at car for a bilat
so if he never did the 19 minute interview it would be EDNQ?
so if he never did the 19 minute interview it would be EDNQ?
it was a separate welcome, then a media availability
it was a separate welcome, then a media availability
I would argue it should be, but maybe it would vibe off it lol
I would argue it should be, but maybe it would vibe off it lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCkVj3gGZPc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCkVj3gGZPc
Carney media availability is always for the Canadian pool.
Carney media availability is always for the Canadian pool.
Market was completely wrong then, the 3 strikes fully bonded just based on the 2 minutes and with some serious volume too
Market was completely wrong then, the 3 strikes fully bonded just based on the 2 minutes and with some serious volume too
scemer said it wasnt streamed on cpac. Lawrence said it was streamed on cpac. How
scemer said it wasnt streamed on cpac. Lawrence said it was streamed on cpac. How
Richer guy wins.
Richer guy wins.
1. price resolve is the key
1. price resolve is the key
hmm
hmm
not on cpac schedule either
not on cpac schedule either
Yah when you have a lot of people on something like this. And then one person is like, "Actually XYZABC123/pie and the answer is this other stream that wasn't announced, and it counts but the first one doen't and I have a 7 figure port and I"m going to push price into the 90s so f*ck you" then I think it's time for the whale to lose.
Yah when you have a lot of people on something like this. And then one person is like, "Actually XYZABC123/pie and the answer is this other stream that wasn't announced, and it counts but the first one doen't and I have a 7 figure port and I"m going to push price into the 90s so f*ck you" then I think it's time for the whale to lose.
<@1334632742792466544> why did lawrence say it was streamed
<@1334632742792466544> why did lawrence say it was streamed
you think he's lying?
you think he's lying?
I have no idea.
I have no idea.
But I was looking at all the channels.
But I was looking at all the channels.
one of you went to a pirated site
one of you went to a pirated site
Do you know the exact time the video was uploaded?
Do you know the exact time the video was uploaded?
2:16 AM ET
2:16 AM ET
on youtube
on youtube
can't speak to cpac
can't speak to cpac
I concur. I checkd this as well.
I concur. I checkd this as well.
Okay. I began farming AI at 1:51 AM ET
Okay. I began farming AI at 1:51 AM ET
1:34 AM EST - Does 2 minutes <walks to other room> <possible dead time> <19 minutes of talking> <possible dead time> 2:16 AM EST - Video uploaded
1:34 AM EST - Does 2 minutes <walks to other room> <possible dead time> <19 minutes of talking> <possible dead time> 2:16 AM EST - Video uploaded
Lemme check...
Lemme check...
off the livestream?
off the livestream?
Right.
Right.
yeah
yeah
I believe you
I believe you
I never didn't believe you for the record
I never didn't believe you for the record
but it's impossible for you to have done that without it being livestreamed
but it's impossible for you to have done that without it being livestreamed
scemer went to the pirated site
scemer went to the pirated site
I saw you on the OB too
I saw you on the OB too
so I can corroborate
so I can corroborate
so now the question again is do SAs matter
so now the question again is do SAs matter
if it was a random facebook stream, we all agree it would not count
if it was a random facebook stream, we all agree it would not count
even if recording came up after?
even if recording came up after?
Unlike Mitchie, I did NOT believe you. But it was indeed impossible for you to do this if it wasn't livestreamed so now I believe you.
Unlike Mitchie, I did NOT believe you. But it was indeed impossible for you to do this if it wasn't livestreamed so now I believe you.
Lawrence wouldn't lie
Lawrence wouldn't lie
Unlike Mitchie, I did NOT believe you. But it was indeed impossible for you to do this if it wasn't livestreamed so now I believe you.
Unlike Mitchie, I did NOT believe you. But it was indeed impossible for you to do this if it wasn't livestreamed so now I believe you.
Unlike Mitchie, I did NOT believe you. But it was indeed impossible for you to do this if it wasn't livestreamed so now I believe you.
Unlike Mitchie, I did NOT believe you. But it was indeed impossible for you to do this if it wasn't livestreamed so now I believe you.
and to scemer i apply hanlon's razor
and to scemer i apply hanlon's razor
I'm sure it's just a mixup
I'm sure it's just a mixup
someone let me know when it's safe to bond, still a ton of shares out there on the orderbook
someone let me know when it's safe to bond, still a ton of shares out there on the orderbook
lol
lol
for me it's just the SA thing
for me it's just the SA thing
I wish we had a strike that hit in first part and not second but oh well
I wish we had a strike that hit in first part and not second but oh well
like if you don't count a facebook stream
like if you don't count a facebook stream
the only difference with CPAC is it's "official"
the only difference with CPAC is it's "official"
but not an SA in the rules
but not an SA in the rules
It's just that if I had livestream, I would have straight up farmed like Lawrence did... you were in CPAC?
It's just that if I had livestream, I would have straight up farmed like Lawrence did... you were in CPAC?
if you argue the <source> = mark carney point to justify overruling that, then why wouldn't a random facebook stream work
if you argue the <source> = mark carney point to justify overruling that, then why wouldn't a random facebook stream work
vibes man
vibes man
literally just vibing at that point
literally just vibing at that point
because cpac feels good
because cpac feels good
strippers still dont count
strippers still dont count
that's kinda unfair
that's kinda unfair
So you agree it is proof Lawrence is right
So you agree it is proof Lawrence is right
If Lawrence was able to farm, he must have found the livestream somewhere I wasn't looking or couldn't find...
If Lawrence was able to farm, he must have found the livestream somewhere I wasn't looking or couldn't find...
im crine sj!
im crine sj!
So do we all agree that the thing that happened did indeed happen
So do we all agree that the thing that happened did indeed happen
its safe
its safe
you can go to sleep now
you can go to sleep now
Man... Carney cuck is honestly not what I was expecting lol.
Man... Carney cuck is honestly not what I was expecting lol.
You need to be as big of a fan of him as I am.
You need to be as big of a fan of him as I am.
this why i dont trade slop
this why i dont trade slop
Mark Carney is NOT slop
Mark Carney is NOT slop
another victory for the slopsharps
another victory for the slopsharps
I did not make a wager on this market...
I did not make a wager on this market...
Actually, a little bit of NQE.
Actually, a little bit of NQE.
Sorry guys for the false alarm. Still a NOOB.
Sorry guys for the false alarm. Still a NOOB.
still have to ignore SAs
still have to ignore SAs
but it'll go Y
but it'll go Y
To echo the words of Mr. Carney in his Davos speech “we take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.”
To echo the words of Mr. Carney in his Davos speech “we take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.”
https://klipy.com/gifs/cat-crying-cat-meme-16
https://klipy.com/gifs/cat-crying-cat-meme-16
I told u it was live streamed in Nunavut <:pepe1:1200159724813963386>
I told u it was live streamed in Nunavut <:pepe1:1200159724813963386>
https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtrumpsay/what-will-trump-say/kxtrumpsay-26jul13?op_market_ticker=KXTRUMPSAY-26JUL13-BIBI&op_order_side=yes&op_side=BUY&op_order_type=limit
https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtrumpsay/what-will-trump-say/kxtrumpsay-26jul13?op_market_ticker=KXTRUMPSAY-26JUL13-BIBI&op_order_side=yes&op_side=BUY&op_order_type=limit
https://klipy.com/gifs/samurai-harakiri-1
https://klipy.com/gifs/samurai-harakiri-1
buy N
buy N
[Carney](https://kalshi.com/markets/kxcarneymention/carney-mention/kxcarneymention-26jul08)
[Carney](https://kalshi.com/markets/kxcarneymention/carney-mention/kxcarneymention-26jul08)
rug?
rug?
whys event dnq not even bonded
whys event dnq not even bonded
wtf is this
wtf is this
first we got a 2 minute interview, then we got a 19 minute interview
first we got a 2 minute interview, then we got a 19 minute interview
thanks
thanks
it's probably safe tbh lmao
it's probably safe tbh lmao
It's beautiful is what it is
It's beautiful is what it is
def safe
def safe
these are all safe enough to bond right
these are all safe enough to bond right
i wont be burnt right
i wont be burnt right
we can discuss further
we can discuss further
why did kalshi have to do me dirty like this
why did kalshi have to do me dirty like this
I believe you are wrong ( <@807477657867649095> ). I believe video 1 counts and video 2 doesn't. Thus AI goes NO. <@1417220501407011020> and Arctic, Russia, and Trump go YES . Why do I believe this? Because the rules say so. The rules say.... "Mark Carney says Arctic as part of NATO media availability originally scheduled for 1:30am ET.... Video of the NATO media availability originally scheduled for 1:30am ET July 8th, 2026 will be primarily used to resolve the market;....transcripts of the NATO media availability originally scheduled for 1:30am ET July 8th, 2026 will be used." Note, the rules do not say "Mark Carney's schedule" or "Mark Carney's media availability." The rules explicitly say "NATO media availability scheduled for 1:30am" for which Mark Carney will be a part of. Carney arrived as schedule for NATO and did his media availability interview at 1:34am, basically right on time. It was livestreamed and easy to find. NATO posted a link on their X, had their own stream, as did AP, and others. A comment from IDEAS (not always reliable, but sometimes astutely brilliant) reflects this interpretation in other words: "the second {interview} is NOT on the NATO schedule because it literally isn't directly part of NATO. The Kalshi market rules say "as part of NATO media availability"; you cannot say that and then say the.....NATO event itself doesn't count but {a later interview which is not a NATO event} does. It is two conflicting rules." To show how dumb ya'lls interpretation is, THE CARNEY SHARP WHO PROPOSED THIS MARKET WITH THE INTENTIONS OF FARMING PEOPLE COULDN'T FIND THE LIVESTREAM of the second video, and half a dozen mentions sharps worked for an hour and couldn't find it either. The rules for this one are the first video. Vibes for this one is the first video. The keyword is NATO. This is a Mark Carney interview at a NATO event, not a private interview later on his schedule. <@252554263841079296> <@660000249774997504> <@1210384389092151359>
I believe you are wrong ( <@807477657867649095> ). I believe video 1 counts and video 2 doesn't. Thus AI goes NO. <@1417220501407011020> and Arctic, Russia, and Trump go YES . Why do I believe this? Because the rules say so. The rules say.... "Mark Carney says Arctic as part of NATO media availability originally scheduled for 1:30am ET.... Video of the NATO media availability originally scheduled for 1:30am ET July 8th, 2026 will be primarily used to resolve the market;....transcripts of the NATO media availability originally scheduled for 1:30am ET July 8th, 2026 will be used." Note, the rules do not say "Mark Carney's schedule" or "Mark Carney's media availability." The rules explicitly say "NATO media availability scheduled for 1:30am" for which Mark Carney will be a part of. Carney arrived as schedule for NATO and did his media availability interview at 1:34am, basically right on time. It was livestreamed and easy to find. NATO posted a link on their X, had their own stream, as did AP, and others. A comment from IDEAS (not always reliable, but sometimes astutely brilliant) reflects this interpretation in other words: "the second {interview} is NOT on the NATO schedule because it literally isn't directly part of NATO. The Kalshi market rules say "as part of NATO media availability"; you cannot say that and then say the.....NATO event itself doesn't count but {a later interview which is not a NATO event} does. It is two conflicting rules." To show how dumb ya'lls interpretation is, THE CARNEY SHARP WHO PROPOSED THIS MARKET WITH THE INTENTIONS OF FARMING PEOPLE COULDN'T FIND THE LIVESTREAM of the second video, and half a dozen mentions sharps worked for an hour and couldn't find it either. The rules for this one are the first video. Vibes for this one is the first video. The keyword is NATO. This is a Mark Carney interview at a NATO event, not a private interview later on his schedule. <@252554263841079296> <@660000249774997504> <@1210384389092151359>
Bruh, I had no intentions of framing people. I literally wrote on plzjake "Mark Carney Media availability" as stated on his pool schedule...
Bruh, I had no intentions of framing people. I literally wrote on plzjake "Mark Carney Media availability" as stated on his pool schedule...
Jake changed the title.
Jake changed the title.
This market is embarrassing for me. Honestly, my original “r word moment” comment that started all this applies to me as much as anyone.
This market is embarrassing for me. Honestly, my original “r word moment” comment that started all this applies to me as much as anyone.
Completely agree
Completely agree
Guys this is settled science, go debate creationism elsewhere.
Guys this is settled science, go debate creationism elsewhere.
https://klipy.com/gifs/marmota-cooking
https://klipy.com/gifs/marmota-cooking
this seems reasonable tbh. idk enough about the event/situation but if this was a second event for canadian media outside of the nato event then i dont see why it would automatically count vs not count
this seems reasonable tbh. idk enough about the event/situation but if this was a second event for canadian media outside of the nato event then i dont see why it would automatically count vs not count
maybe soon enough after that will be grouped with the nato one but idk
maybe soon enough after that will be grouped with the nato one but idk
https://klipy.com/gifs/stinky-loser
https://klipy.com/gifs/stinky-loser
Bro why are you like halfporting this 🙁
Bro why are you like halfporting this 🙁
ive decided kalshi is too much
ive decided kalshi is too much
my research doesnt work
my research doesnt work
so if this doesnt hit its a sign to dip
so if this doesnt hit its a sign to dip
I have no alpha on that market at all but maybe the yolo is a sign to dip before you potentially lose it, idk
I have no alpha on that market at all but maybe the yolo is a sign to dip before you potentially lose it, idk
its 100% a terrible move
its 100% a terrible move
Why is AI gaining traction the other way. Why is no one clicking that 20k at 67c
Why is AI gaining traction the other way. Why is no one clicking that 20k at 67c
hes the sharpest hand in the west
hes the sharpest hand in the west
1/3 of mention sharps gone
1/3 of mention sharps gone
Solstice posts are unironically a work of art. Listen and learn.
Solstice posts are unironically a work of art. Listen and learn.
Pre registering my prediction: TLDR Solstice: the market can still resolve DNQ, if Mike Pence has the courage
Pre registering my prediction: TLDR Solstice: the market can still resolve DNQ, if Mike Pence has the courage
I do think that AI is definitely not bond on Carney.
I do think that AI is definitely not bond on Carney.
Don’t stare directly at it
Don’t stare directly at it
NATO media availability is AP.
NATO media availability is AP.
https://www.youtube.com/live/1_OcXcE45yw?si=WvzvPSeZS22HjGmH&t=2326
https://www.youtube.com/live/1_OcXcE45yw?si=WvzvPSeZS22HjGmH&t=2326
Jump into the market or let it go. Enough cuckery.
Jump into the market or let it go. Enough cuckery.
At least part 1 it
At least part 1 it
Guys, are we sure this Solstice post is even happening?
Guys, are we sure this Solstice post is even happening?
You thought he was about to send? He basically just started
You thought he was about to send? He basically just started
This is like the White House stream waiting screen
This is like the White House stream waiting screen
glhf on the nato rules tn fellas
glhf on the nato rules tn fellas
solstice must have like 30 wpm typing or something
solstice must have like 30 wpm typing or something
Yes, it seems to be a fair argument. <@807477657867649095> and others are arguing for a non-NATO interview to count even though the contract rules state clearly it's the NATO media availability interview at 1:30am ET. Carney was interviewed at 1:34am ET as scheduled by NATO and NATO posted about it, streamed it, and it was also streamed by AP. This reminds me in many ways of two markets: #1. The recent Hochul market where she had two events in one stream. The first one counted. The second one didn't. Different but very, very similar from the time perspective. #2. One of the first NBA post media markets. A Laker player was interviewed in the locker room and people thought it counted. It didn't because it wasn't part of the "NBA post media availability" interview. Again, different, but similar. The first video was a NATO interview. The second Carney interview was ilke the locker room interview. FWIW, I stand to lose a luaghable $230 on this if it goes against me. I have friends who will lose a lot more.
Yes, it seems to be a fair argument. <@807477657867649095> and others are arguing for a non-NATO interview to count even though the contract rules state clearly it's the NATO media availability interview at 1:30am ET. Carney was interviewed at 1:34am ET as scheduled by NATO and NATO posted about it, streamed it, and it was also streamed by AP. This reminds me in many ways of two markets: #1. The recent Hochul market where she had two events in one stream. The first one counted. The second one didn't. Different but very, very similar from the time perspective. #2. One of the first NBA post media markets. A Laker player was interviewed in the locker room and people thought it counted. It didn't because it wasn't part of the "NBA post media availability" interview. Again, different, but similar. The first video was a NATO interview. The second Carney interview was ilke the locker room interview. FWIW, I stand to lose a luaghable $230 on this if it goes against me. I have friends who will lose a lot more.
I had to type out all the bad arguments first. I deleted those because tehre was no reason to share them.
I had to type out all the bad arguments first. I deleted those because tehre was no reason to share them.
Next time need a duration market
Next time need a duration market
One day they will resolve a 99c the other way. Perhaps toady is the day. We must ask, "Do we want Kalshi to be a scam site like Polymarket where whales can determine outcomes? Or do we want Kalshi to be principled wehre there rules are followed and we accept that whales sometimes have a lot of ego, mess up, and get wrecked?" I vote for the latter, and I think most people would as well.
One day they will resolve a 99c the other way. Perhaps toady is the day. We must ask, "Do we want Kalshi to be a scam site like Polymarket where whales can determine outcomes? Or do we want Kalshi to be principled wehre there rules are followed and we accept that whales sometimes have a lot of ego, mess up, and get wrecked?" I vote for the latter, and I think most people would as well.
How can u say whales determine outcomes on Polymarket 🤣
How can u say whales determine outcomes on Polymarket 🤣
I would argue it's way easier to manipulate Kalshi resolution than Poly
I would argue it's way easier to manipulate Kalshi resolution than Poly
Thank you, messiah 🙏🏽
Thank you, messiah 🙏🏽
bros gonna say does not qualify
bros gonna say does not qualify
I think Solstice is 100% right, but I'm just not sure if will resolve that way.
I think Solstice is 100% right, but I'm just not sure if will resolve that way.
what was the last 1/99c resolve in favor of the 1c
what was the last 1/99c resolve in favor of the 1c
this is for sure resolving Y
this is for sure resolving Y
get Mitchie on it
get Mitchie on it
AI steaming lol
AI steaming lol
stfu jerry
stfu jerry
Good luck on Trump. I am going to sleep. Here is my write up on the Carney market. Didn't know anyone was waiting. <@1417220501407011020>, <@1460986477742657662> , <@1413713829883543613> https://x.com/alch3my101/status/2074817057754169349?s=20 FWIW, when these thigns happen, even though I may sometimes be aggressive to my side, I'm always content with a FV resolution or people just getting refunds. I hate the rule cucks, and I don't play them intentionally.
Good luck on Trump. I am going to sleep. Here is my write up on the Carney market. Didn't know anyone was waiting. <@1417220501407011020>, <@1460986477742657662> , <@1413713829883543613> https://x.com/alch3my101/status/2074817057754169349?s=20 FWIW, when these thigns happen, even though I may sometimes be aggressive to my side, I'm always content with a FV resolution or people just getting refunds. I hate the rule cucks, and I don't play them intentionally.
<@1448568704580456529> russia Y the same is it not
<@1448568704580456529> russia Y the same is it not
Yeah. I’m with you on this. NATO media availability means AP feed which was also available to NATO media on NATO feed.
Yeah. I’m with you on this. NATO media availability means AP feed which was also available to NATO media on NATO feed.
wheres the link to the 2nd video
wheres the link to the 2nd video
That feed is the most aligned with the rule.
That feed is the most aligned with the rule.
He says Russia, Trump and Arctic in both videos so those are clear Y. He says AI only in the second one. For a while we wondered if the 2nd video was even livestreamed which could in theory have led to everything going NO and ENDQ going Y, if you believe the first video didn't count (I think it does). That caused prices for those 3 strikes to come down for a bit even though they was no doubt they were said in both. Once Lawrence confirmed it livestremed then we knew that one would count so those 3 strikes bonded. Nothing else hit (I didn't awtch the 2nd video, I only checked the transcript).
He says Russia, Trump and Arctic in both videos so those are clear Y. He says AI only in the second one. For a while we wondered if the 2nd video was even livestreamed which could in theory have led to everything going NO and ENDQ going Y, if you believe the first video didn't count (I think it does). That caused prices for those 3 strikes to come down for a bit even though they was no doubt they were said in both. Once Lawrence confirmed it livestremed then we knew that one would count so those 3 strikes bonded. Nothing else hit (I didn't awtch the 2nd video, I only checked the transcript).
I see, nice writeup
I see, nice writeup
GL, you are correct in my heart
GL, you are correct in my heart
He is right that if there is a case for 99c Y going N, it’s this one.
He is right that if there is a case for 99c Y going N, it’s this one.
NATO avail part seems like the strongest argument to me
NATO avail part seems like the strongest argument to me
Been hitting consistently lately 🐐bankroll going up heavy add me and I’ll send what I got for today 💯✅
Been hitting consistently lately 🐐bankroll going up heavy add me and I’ll send what I got for today 💯✅
Yeah, it was available to nato media on nato feed as well.
Yeah, it was available to nato media on nato feed as well.
got a free roll on it
got a free roll on it
<@867068302517076009> wyt?
<@867068302517076009> wyt?