2026-07-08 · Kalshi · 20 条相关讨论
Now that create order is on the yes-side, creating an ask yes at (1-price) is the same as bid no at price. https://docs.kalshi.com/api-reference/orders/create-order-v2
Now that create order is on the yes-side, creating an ask yes at (1-price) is the same as bid no at price. https://docs.kalshi.com/api-reference/orders/create-order-v2
An ask at 1- price is selling a yes at 1-price, a bid at price is buying yes at price. I wish to buy nos. Is there an additional parameter?
An ask at 1- price is selling a yes at 1-price, a bid at price is buying yes at price. I wish to buy nos. Is there an additional parameter?
No. A 90c ask for "yes" and a 10c bid for "no" are exactly the same order. https://docs.kalshi.com/getting_started/order_direction
No. A 90c ask for "yes" and a 10c bid for "no" are exactly the same order. https://docs.kalshi.com/getting_started/order_direction
changing "outcome_side" does not change only being able to by/sell yes order. For events with more than two markets, a no is fundamentally different than a yes
changing "outcome_side" does not change only being able to by/sell yes order. For events with more than two markets, a no is fundamentally different than a yes
There has never been any such thing as a no contract to buy. It's always been strictly a construct of the UI. You have a positive or negative position on the single order book. Buying increases your position by placing bids, selling reduces your position by placing asks
There has never been any such thing as a no contract to buy. It's always been strictly a construct of the UI. You have a positive or negative position on the single order book. Buying increases your position by placing bids, selling reduces your position by placing asks
So a position of -100 is the same as "owning 100 no contracts" in the UI
So a position of -100 is the same as "owning 100 no contracts" in the UI
so there is no way to buy no's through the api?
so there is no way to buy no's through the api?
there's no such thing as no's
there's no such thing as no's
You place an an order on the ask side. This sells a position on the yes order book. That's the same as a no
You place an an order on the ask side. This sells a position on the yes order book. That's the same as a no
It's exactly what the UI is doing when you "buy no" it just isn't dressing it up for you
It's exactly what the UI is doing when you "buy no" it just isn't dressing it up for you
hmmm ill have to test your theory, ball knower
hmmm ill have to test your theory, ball knower
Lol. It's not a theory
Lol. It's not a theory
It's how the exchange works
It's how the exchange works
They're the same thing under the hood.
They're the same thing under the hood.
The UI will display sell yes 87 c , but the order book will show buy no. Which is is good , as I wanted to buy nos
The UI will display sell yes 87 c , but the order book will show buy no. Which is is good , as I wanted to buy nos
The order book will absolutely never show buy no. The UI is a mirage. It is skinned for casual users
The order book will absolutely never show buy no. The UI is a mirage. It is skinned for casual users
Buy no = sell yes
Buy no = sell yes
Everything on the api is based on a single "yes" order book. A positive outcome on given strike
Everything on the api is based on a single "yes" order book. A positive outcome on given strike
You are either long or short that position
You are either long or short that position
The point is to combine liquidity into a single pool per ticker
The point is to combine liquidity into a single pool per ticker