https://klipy.com/gifs/michael-scott-95
https://klipy.com/gifs/michael-scott-95
2026-07-20 · Kalshi · 328 条相关讨论
https://klipy.com/gifs/michael-scott-95
https://klipy.com/gifs/michael-scott-95
we need more letting the market run overnight, late night hours have been nothing recently
we need more letting the market run overnight, late night hours have been nothing recently
Is this real
Is this real
Minnesota probably winning
Minnesota probably winning
8% of port 🥀
8% of port 🥀
The classic "I lost money so I'm charging back" response
The classic "I lost money so I'm charging back" response
Never fails
Never fails
<@252554263841079296> you are free now
<@252554263841079296> you are free now
Thanks
Thanks
It only ever happens with them
It only ever happens with them
I was going to point to the brad thread
I was going to point to the brad thread
Because I think I stunlocked him
Because I think I stunlocked him
Willy have you guys considered just flipping a coin to decide how to resolve? Since price closed at 50/50
Willy have you guys considered just flipping a coin to decide how to resolve? Since price closed at 50/50
Scalar res
Scalar res
Brad Pitt's left half was at the game
Brad Pitt's left half was at the game
I don't get this at all mane
I don't get this at all mane
My sleep is fcked
My sleep is fcked
How does Leo go N but Brad stays open 😭
How does Leo go N but Brad stays open 😭
Did any of the lists put Leo on?
Did any of the lists put Leo on?
Leo had just as good of an argument to stay open for additional reporting, if that is the purpose of the TBD
Leo had just as good of an argument to stay open for additional reporting, if that is the purpose of the TBD
Ohtani selling
Ohtani selling
There was a source that said he was likely there, and my understanding is a photo that had what was probably him in it, but didn't have face
There was a source that said he was likely there, and my understanding is a photo that had what was probably him in it, but didn't have face
Seemed like a great spot to leave it open for evidence
Seemed like a great spot to leave it open for evidence
I thought that was him too but probably was her daddy
I thought that was him too but probably was her daddy
If that's what the idea of this market was
If that's what the idea of this market was
I just don't get it
I just don't get it
aw mane
aw mane
Guy who was probably actually there -> N Guy who was def not there -> Y
Guy who was probably actually there -> N Guy who was def not there -> Y
Brad Pitt was probably there
Brad Pitt was probably there
makes sense to me, source agency says Pitt was there but since he probably wasn't actually there it is left open in case alibi is found
makes sense to me, source agency says Pitt was there but since he probably wasn't actually there it is left open in case alibi is found
I firmly believe that
I firmly believe that
dawg
dawg
it payed out
it payed out
?
?
I'm talking about brad
I'm talking about brad
no way u act think he was there
no way u act think he was there
r u fr?
r u fr?
Yes
Yes
More likely than not imo
More likely than not imo
There are multiple different sources saying he was there
There are multiple different sources saying he was there
That drew from different underlying reporting
That drew from different underlying reporting
?
?
He would be the only A list celeb to not be photographed/ videoed at a game before?
He would be the only A list celeb to not be photographed/ videoed at a game before?
There's no way this is true
There's no way this is true
And selection bias
And selection bias
I mean for Kalshi markets
I mean for Kalshi markets
No
No
dude no way he went imo lol
dude no way he went imo lol
Tracy morgan
Tracy morgan
other than Tracy of course lol
other than Tracy of course lol
Yeah it wouldn’t have hurt to have left Leo and maybe some others open still
Yeah it wouldn’t have hurt to have left Leo and maybe some others open still
and Spike Lee
and Spike Lee
This is way stronger than Tracy Morgan was
This is way stronger than Tracy Morgan was
correct
correct
Which relied solely on one proven-to-be shoddy list
Which relied solely on one proven-to-be shoddy list
This has multiple independent sources getting there on their own
This has multiple independent sources getting there on their own
Though them leaving Brad Pitt open doesn’t seem to be for more evidence to come out based off the green box
Though them leaving Brad Pitt open doesn’t seem to be for more evidence to come out based off the green box
But who knows maybe
But who knows maybe
+ he was listed on pregame guest list
+ he was listed on pregame guest list
Tom Holland made it all the way to the exit gate before someone caught 2s of his back. If that can happen why not Brad Pitt
Tom Holland made it all the way to the exit gate before someone caught 2s of his back. If that can happen why not Brad Pitt
🥀 I thought this was Leo at first but I am torso-blind autist
🥀 I thought this was Leo at first but I am torso-blind autist
The whole argument of him not being photographed means he wasn't there is stupid
The whole argument of him not being photographed means he wasn't there is stupid
"when has a celebrity ever not been photographed"
"when has a celebrity ever not been photographed"
You don't find out about the ones who don't get photographed
You don't find out about the ones who don't get photographed
That's how it works
That's how it works
Seriously
Seriously
well yea but thats not the argument tho
well yea but thats not the argument tho
we just saying realistally he prob wasnt there
we just saying realistally he prob wasnt there
like if the market resolved on reality
like if the market resolved on reality
it wouldve closed way below 50c
it wouldve closed way below 50c
because it was literally at 50
because it was literally at 50
with a source agency saying he was there
with a source agency saying he was there
yeah it's easy for me to say with no shares, he almost certainly wasn't there (less than 10%) but will resolve Y (more than 90%)
yeah it's easy for me to say with no shares, he almost certainly wasn't there (less than 10%) but will resolve Y (more than 90%)
if the market resolved on reality it would resolve yes because a source news agency reported it occurred
if the market resolved on reality it would resolve yes because a source news agency reported it occurred
I disagree
I disagree
ez pz wipe your hands of it
ez pz wipe your hands of it
yes the market will resolve that way due to the contract but it's also likely to understand source agencies make mistakes
yes the market will resolve that way due to the contract but it's also likely to understand source agencies make mistakes
If the market was a default to N unless there is affirmative proof, that'd be different
If the market was a default to N unless there is affirmative proof, that'd be different
But also not based on reality
But also not based on reality
dude what
dude what
I mean it's the blackpill
I mean it's the blackpill
Reality is source agency reporting as far as we're able to perceive it
Reality is source agency reporting as far as we're able to perceive it
yea but we not talking abt market
yea but we not talking abt market
what u think odds are he was actually there
what u think odds are he was actually there
upon my further review he was definitely there in reality case closed
upon my further review he was definitely there in reality case closed
like if god was settling this market lmfao
like if god was settling this market lmfao
low, would need a Holland but even more extreme out of the public eye because Holland was eventually just barely captured on camera
low, would need a Holland but even more extreme out of the public eye because Holland was eventually just barely captured on camera
>50
>50
Like
Like
Pregame list had Pitt
Pregame list had Pitt
Reported by source agencies
Reported by source agencies
Sources listed Pitt in attendance
Sources listed Pitt in attendance
What else is there
What else is there
this is more likely evidence of bad source agencies than that he was there
this is more likely evidence of bad source agencies than that he was there
How so
How so
dude I mean it was literally closing at 50c
dude I mean it was literally closing at 50c
It was a farm
It was a farm
because source agencies could and have in the past obviously publish a list based on the pregame list
because source agencies could and have in the past obviously publish a list based on the pregame list
Yeah that's why the reporter said "we saw... Brad Pitt" lmao
Yeah that's why the reporter said "we saw... Brad Pitt" lmao
Why is the graffiti where I live just dicks and gang tags and not stuff like this
Why is the graffiti where I live just dicks and gang tags and not stuff like this
This is evidence that it's more likely, because he was expected to be in attendance
This is evidence that it's more likely, because he was expected to be in attendance
But I see your argument
But I see your argument
Occam's razor is either he rarely escaped all photo and video unlike 99% of strikes across all attendance markets I've ever seen, or one guy lied (possibly based on the pregame list). It has to go Y because there's no alibi but I highly doubt he was actually there
Occam's razor is either he rarely escaped all photo and video unlike 99% of strikes across all attendance markets I've ever seen, or one guy lied (possibly based on the pregame list). It has to go Y because there's no alibi but I highly doubt he was actually there
I disagree
I disagree
80k person stadium
80k person stadium
Brad Pitt kinda a nobody he could slip under the radar
Brad Pitt kinda a nobody he could slip under the radar
Unreasonable to expect everybody to be captured
Unreasonable to expect everybody to be captured
Especially because Pitt is generally pretty low-key in appearance
Especially because Pitt is generally pretty low-key in appearance
I do wonder though
I do wonder though
Like I said - when a celebrity goes to a game and does not get photographed, you never find out about it
Like I said - when a celebrity goes to a game and does not get photographed, you never find out about it
What % of celebrity game-attendances are photographed? You have no idea
What % of celebrity game-attendances are photographed? You have no idea
You think it's more likely that one guy correctly saw him from his seats from far away compared to literally every other camera in the building failing to capture him, including him being transported too and from game
You think it's more likely that one guy correctly saw him from his seats from far away compared to literally every other camera in the building failing to capture him, including him being transported too and from game
Because survivorship bias
Because survivorship bias
If information comes out tomorrow that places him elsewhere and it goes N then every other N that didn't have that confirmation is a misresolve
If information comes out tomorrow that places him elsewhere and it goes N then every other N that didn't have that confirmation is a misresolve
No, I think it's more likely he saw him walking around the stadium
No, I think it's more likely he saw him walking around the stadium
in the Kalshi markets you would
in the Kalshi markets you would
Not with binoculars from across the stadium
Not with binoculars from across the stadium
Would they resolve N off of info tomorrow
Would they resolve N off of info tomorrow
yeah that's what the greenbox is about
yeah that's what the greenbox is about
How could they possibly resolve all those others N then too
How could they possibly resolve all those others N then too
In modern society everyone has their phone cameras someone would almost certainly post a picture or something on twitter
In modern society everyone has their phone cameras someone would almost certainly post a picture or something on twitter
because there's no pictures/videos + no source agencies claimed they were there so there is no debate
because there's no pictures/videos + no source agencies claimed they were there so there is no debate
True
True
Like that time we got a pic of Tracy Morgan at the NBA finals
Like that time we got a pic of Tracy Morgan at the NBA finals
What if they just didn't get around to it yet?
What if they just didn't get around to it yet?
It's insane to early res some N off lack of reporting
It's insane to early res some N off lack of reporting
But then hold one up that has consensus reporting
But then hold one up that has consensus reporting
consensus reporting?
consensus reporting?
One way or the other
One way or the other
I feel like that’s why they’re holding it up
I feel like that’s why they’re holding it up
I also think the market should be TBD for at least a day, what if Leo/Pitt come out tomorrow and talks about how great it was being at the world cup final?
I also think the market should be TBD for at least a day, what if Leo/Pitt come out tomorrow and talks about how great it was being at the world cup final?
A few sources in consensus, no contradiction
A few sources in consensus, no contradiction
That satisfies the payout criterion
That satisfies the payout criterion
barring no change, it resolves yes
barring no change, it resolves yes
Underlying: The Underlying for this Contract is reporting from the Source Agency. Revisions to the Underlying made after Expiration will not be accounted for in determining the Expiration Value.
Underlying: The Underlying for this Contract is reporting from the Source Agency. Revisions to the Underlying made after Expiration will not be accounted for in determining the Expiration Value.
Again, this and Tracey Morgan would be the first Y attendence strikes in history with no photo/ video evidence, which is fine, but fair to leave it open
Again, this and Tracey Morgan would be the first Y attendence strikes in history with no photo/ video evidence, which is fine, but fair to leave it open
Cause it has enough to go Y already but they either need more time to decide or want better confirmation to come out to make resolving it Y more justifiable
Cause it has enough to go Y already but they either need more time to decide or want better confirmation to come out to make resolving it Y more justifiable
Leo can easily post a pic of him at the game tomorrow on his instagram story
Leo can easily post a pic of him at the game tomorrow on his instagram story
I.e. photo or video
I.e. photo or video
This is what I'm saying
This is what I'm saying
which is why its dumb they already settled Leo at N
which is why its dumb they already settled Leo at N
Are we operating off hypotheticals or not
Are we operating off hypotheticals or not
Because if we are, leave Leo open and this open
Because if we are, leave Leo open and this open
If we're not, resolve both
If we're not, resolve both
But no source agencies said he was there
But no source agencies said he was there
Decide whether SA is sufficient
Decide whether SA is sufficient
were waved mitchie
were waved mitchie
One said he was likely there
One said he was likely there
if they said "he was there" then it would probably be left open
if they said "he was there" then it would probably be left open
Lack of reporting != Confirmation of N
Lack of reporting != Confirmation of N
this also loses all credibility to "appearances" markets. Why would i ever want to risk my money on something that they can resolve without confirmation?
this also loses all credibility to "appearances" markets. Why would i ever want to risk my money on something that they can resolve without confirmation?
yes it is, because you need a source agency to resolve Y
yes it is, because you need a source agency to resolve Y
If a celebrity goes to a game but it is never reported then it's a N obviously
If a celebrity goes to a game but it is never reported then it's a N obviously
So what they're saying by instaresolving N is that "the snapshot of SA reporting at this time, even if attendance is ambiguous/undefined one way or the other, is enough to resolve the market"
So what they're saying by instaresolving N is that "the snapshot of SA reporting at this time, even if attendance is ambiguous/undefined one way or the other, is enough to resolve the market"
no u dont.
no u dont.
source agencies are the confirmation
source agencies are the confirmation
no they arent dude
no they arent dude
But this can't happen cause at least one photo would be taken of them
But this can't happen cause at least one photo would be taken of them
its also "social media posts"
its also "social media posts"
Right?
Right?
if a celebrity goes under the radar then for the market's purposes they didn't go
if a celebrity goes under the radar then for the market's purposes they didn't go
Yea this doesn’t rlly make sense to me
Yea this doesn’t rlly make sense to me
what strike do you think was resolved without a source agency?
what strike do you think was resolved without a source agency?
Agreed
Agreed
Leo
Leo
Tina fey went Y based on broadcast footage and NYT photo only no actual report
Tina fey went Y based on broadcast footage and NYT photo only no actual report
what source agency said he went to game?
what source agency said he went to game?
But by leaving the market open you're saying that the snapshot of source agency reporting isn't sufficient to be sure of the outcome
But by leaving the market open you're saying that the snapshot of source agency reporting isn't sufficient to be sure of the outcome
Why is that the case here but not for leo
Why is that the case here but not for leo
If we're leaving it open for counterevidence to come out for pitt
If we're leaving it open for counterevidence to come out for pitt
video/ photo is a source agency + NY Times
video/ photo is a source agency + NY Times
Cuz if they waiting for more info to resolve pitt how could they ever settle any of the Ns
Cuz if they waiting for more info to resolve pitt how could they ever settle any of the Ns
Why aren't we leaving it open to allow for supporting evidence for others
Why aren't we leaving it open to allow for supporting evidence for others
Unless there’s proof they not there somehow
Unless there’s proof they not there somehow
For the ones that are ambiguous*
For the ones that are ambiguous*
US Weekly stated that "Leo reportedly attended"
US Weekly stated that "Leo reportedly attended"
It's different if we have concrete evidence they were elsewhere
It's different if we have concrete evidence they were elsewhere
that's not attendence being confirmed ?
that's not attendence being confirmed ?
so just leave open the damn market until tomorrow, when they can actually confirm
so just leave open the damn market until tomorrow, when they can actually confirm
Why? Kalshi isn't wrong, and faster settlements are better for all
Why? Kalshi isn't wrong, and faster settlements are better for all
and thats not an N also. Which is my whole point. Leave it TBD for now and figure it out in the next day or two
and thats not an N also. Which is my whole point. Leave it TBD for now and figure it out in the next day or two
In practice nothing is going to come out
In practice nothing is going to come out
thats not true when its clearly ambiguous at the time
thats not true when its clearly ambiguous at the time
If Leo later confirmed he was definitively there Kalshi would likely pay out Y, there's nothing to complain about
If Leo later confirmed he was definitively there Kalshi would likely pay out Y, there's nothing to complain about
Yea but we not arguing that it should be left open
Yea but we not arguing that it should be left open
We saying that’s right
We saying that’s right
This should theoretically support fast Y res but not necessarily fast N res
This should theoretically support fast Y res but not necessarily fast N res
But that they should also pay out Pitt
But that they should also pay out Pitt
Like the payout criterion was met
Like the payout criterion was met
Exactly
Exactly
Nothing else should matter
Nothing else should matter
no they wont haha
no they wont haha
they actually have many times
they actually have many times
Either both should've been left open, or both paid out
Either both should've been left open, or both paid out
It would be a massive loss, so they obivously (correctly) view the "risk" being practically zero
It would be a massive loss, so they obivously (correctly) view the "risk" being practically zero
If we're trying to be consistent
If we're trying to be consistent
Yeah they won't
Yeah they won't
Rules cover that
Rules cover that
Slade what r u talking about
Slade what r u talking about
Revisions made to underlying after expiration don't matter
Revisions made to underlying after expiration don't matter
idk what you guys are talking about, Kalshi pays out misresolves all the time
idk what you guys are talking about, Kalshi pays out misresolves all the time
They are under no obligation to pay out Y
They are under no obligation to pay out Y
like?
like?
Any example they misresolved and didn't payout correct side?
Any example they misresolved and didn't payout correct side?
They wouldn't pay this out
They wouldn't pay this out
Because it wouldn't be a misresolve
Because it wouldn't be a misresolve
I've been apart of 5+ usually on side they misresolve for intially
I've been apart of 5+ usually on side they misresolve for intially
It would be a resolution based on the state of the underlying at expiration
It would be a resolution based on the state of the underlying at expiration
And then a revision to the underlying afterwards
And then a revision to the underlying afterwards
Which is explicitly called out as not being relevant
Which is explicitly called out as not being relevant
https://kalshi.com/markets/kxhsi/hangseng/kxhsi-26jun30
https://kalshi.com/markets/kxhsi/hangseng/kxhsi-26jun30
the "errenously" paid out HK24k, and then repaid out N holders from their own pockets
the "errenously" paid out HK24k, and then repaid out N holders from their own pockets
Genuinely fck this guy
Genuinely fck this guy
Just constantly lying
Just constantly lying
A misresolve is different
A misresolve is different
Leo wouldn't be a misres
Leo wouldn't be a misres
what do you mean, if theoretically he came out tomorrow with evidence he was there
what do you mean, if theoretically he came out tomorrow with evidence he was there
Not a misresolve
Not a misresolve
It wasn't resolved in error
It wasn't resolved in error
It was resolved based off a snapshot of SA reporting that was revised post expiration
It was resolved based off a snapshot of SA reporting that was revised post expiration
<:kekw:1197913802931449886>
<:kekw:1197913802931449886>
That's different from a fckup
That's different from a fckup
mitchie is unfortunately right in this situation
mitchie is unfortunately right in this situation
You just disagree with the speed of resolution
You just disagree with the speed of resolution
But if we're taking a snapshot of Leo and saying "ok, no reports so N"
But if we're taking a snapshot of Leo and saying "ok, no reports so N"
Why are we not doing the same for Y here
Why are we not doing the same for Y here
If ANYTHING it should be flipped
If ANYTHING it should be flipped
is there a snapshot clause in universal kalshi ruleset?
is there a snapshot clause in universal kalshi ruleset?
Y should instares off a single SA report with N staying open
Y should instares off a single SA report with N staying open
All resolutions are vibes. Rules are suggestions, we waste our time trying to understand them
All resolutions are vibes. Rules are suggestions, we waste our time trying to understand them
in practice this obviously would be awful
in practice this obviously would be awful
Sure
Sure
But it makes more sense than this
But it makes more sense than this
A positive can he "proven" instantly
A positive can he "proven" instantly
A negative cannot
A negative cannot
Unless there's hard evidence of them being elsewhere at the time*
Unless there's hard evidence of them being elsewhere at the time*
preach
preach
Just like how a mention can become Y in an instant, but N has to decay
Just like how a mention can become Y in an instant, but N has to decay
I really don't see the problem with how Kalshi is handling this. Any photo/video = insta Y, list with no Photo/Video = also Y but give some time just in case
I really don't see the problem with how Kalshi is handling this. Any photo/video = insta Y, list with no Photo/Video = also Y but give some time just in case
u just argued against urself here
u just argued against urself here
ur on our side now
ur on our side now
I was always on the side of Y resolution. That's the contract, but I think they are handling it brilliantly by not paying out quickly
I was always on the side of Y resolution. That's the contract, but I think they are handling it brilliantly by not paying out quickly
This is my special hell
This is my special hell
Being forced to argue a cuck
Being forced to argue a cuck
With randoms
With randoms
This is genuinely the worst
This is genuinely the worst
u just said "but give some time just in case". they arent giving Leo Y any time
u just said "but give some time just in case". they arent giving Leo Y any time
LMAO
LMAO
Please give me the sports cabal
Please give me the sports cabal
because no source agency said he was there
because no source agency said he was there
U cuck
U cuck
bruh
bruh
No source agency said Pitt wasn't there
No source agency said Pitt wasn't there
So we don't need to wait for N evidence yeah?
So we don't need to wait for N evidence yeah?
it's the lack of video/ photo
it's the lack of video/ photo
I'm cool with instaresing anything that has no contradiction
I'm cool with instaresing anything that has no contradiction
For the record
For the record
I saw Leo and my mind went to the pope
I saw Leo and my mind went to the pope
There's a chance a source agency corrects a text list, but you can't take back a photo
There's a chance a source agency corrects a text list, but you can't take back a photo
What if the source agencies change their article after close
What if the source agencies change their article after close
bruh it’s gonna be Pitt N
bruh it’s gonna be Pitt N
Source: bruh
Source: bruh
Lmfao
Lmfao
Hello, I am likely going to dispute the resolution of the Travis Scott not attending the World Cup market. Travis posted a photo of his kids in an unidentifiable hallway and the market is taking it as a valid resolution but it legally would not resolve that way. Any clarification on this resolution would be great, and a legal contact at Kalshi to email would also be great
Hello, I am likely going to dispute the resolution of the Travis Scott not attending the World Cup market. Travis posted a photo of his kids in an unidentifiable hallway and the market is taking it as a valid resolution but it legally would not resolve that way. Any clarification on this resolution would be great, and a legal contact at Kalshi to email would also be great
https://klipy.com/gifs/mrbeast-ytpmv-1
https://klipy.com/gifs/mrbeast-ytpmv-1
thats prob AI travis tbh
thats prob AI travis tbh
which is source is this lol
which is source is this lol
[NBC](https://www.nbcsports.com/soccer/live/spain-vs-argentina-live-updates-score-goals-highlights-stats-2026-fifa-world-cup-july-19)
[NBC](https://www.nbcsports.com/soccer/live/spain-vs-argentina-live-updates-score-goals-highlights-stats-2026-fifa-world-cup-july-19)
when i was a lot younger i did the floss emote in front of my sister when we were arguing and she threw the tv remote straight at my face
when i was a lot younger i did the floss emote in front of my sister when we were arguing and she threw the tv remote straight at my face
not good, Argentina lost 🥀
not good, Argentina lost 🥀
> "forced"
> "forced"
bro they’ve been arguing in the thread for almost 3 hours straight
bro they’ve been arguing in the thread for almost 3 hours straight
What is your reasoning for believing so strongly he was not there
What is your reasoning for believing so strongly he was not there
NBC and AP came to the conclusion separately
NBC and AP came to the conclusion separately
He was listed on pregame guest list
He was listed on pregame guest list
The judging has become complete and utter slop without Len though. Genuinely just the three judges (they added Derek Hough) circle jerking trying to one up each other for how much they glaze the celebs
The judging has become complete and utter slop without Len though. Genuinely just the three judges (they added Derek Hough) circle jerking trying to one up each other for how much they glaze the celebs
no picture/ video (reality), I'm not arguing for the contract to go N
no picture/ video (reality), I'm not arguing for the contract to go N
We're talking about it like it's a foregone conclusion
We're talking about it like it's a foregone conclusion
He absolutely could've been there
He absolutely could've been there
That's unfortunate to hear
That's unfortunate to hear
I think that's silly
I think that's silly
There's plenty of smoke
There's plenty of smoke
Yeah like it was always kind of rough but you at least had Len to keep them straight a little, but now they have no straight man
Yeah like it was always kind of rough but you at least had Len to keep them straight a little, but now they have no straight man
It isn't USA today that just reposted the guest list
It isn't USA today that just reposted the guest list
When I was watching it like 20 years ago it really seemed to be about the dancing
When I was watching it like 20 years ago it really seemed to be about the dancing
It's two different sources both saying he was there, plus the guest list, with one saying "we saw him"
It's two different sources both saying he was there, plus the guest list, with one saying "we saw him"
It's possible but would be first of its kind situation from what I've seen
It's possible but would be first of its kind situation from what I've seen
God it's messed up that I even existed 20 years ago wtf
God it's messed up that I even existed 20 years ago wtf
Not cool
Not cool
And like
And like
What is the article other than the NBC?
What is the article other than the NBC?
It's not like they just anchored on the guest list
It's not like they just anchored on the guest list
Because there's people on the NBC list not on the guest list
Because there's people on the NBC list not on the guest list
So there's something there
So there's something there
I never saw an article other than the NBC?
I never saw an article other than the NBC?
AP
AP
The opening song went hard AF do they still use he same one
The opening song went hard AF do they still use he same one
gng he wont
gng he wont
https://archive.is/x9FLZ
https://archive.is/x9FLZ
holy shi hop off my dih lmao
holy shi hop off my dih lmao
I'm not talking about market res btw
I'm not talking about market res btw
Just reality of chance he was there
Just reality of chance he was there
this guy got bullied into changing his article 🥀
this guy got bullied into changing his article 🥀
Yeah, just completely changed the content
Yeah, just completely changed the content
Not like he just removed pitt
Not like he just removed pitt
Bro I can't
Bro I can't
I can't do it
I can't do it
I'm going to crash out
I'm going to crash out
We put ideas in an rfd thread
We put ideas in an rfd thread
Where
Where
To argue a resolution
To argue a resolution
https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/1528596668771995668
https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/1528596668771995668
I get ragebaited too easily
I get ragebaited too easily
The worst ragebait
The worst ragebait
In this whole server
In this whole server
I fall for it every time
I fall for it every time
"I found a photo of Nick in the stands, no way he could've seen Brad Pitt anywhere!"
"I found a photo of Nick in the stands, no way he could've seen Brad Pitt anywhere!"
"we just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the NBC source reporting can be safely ignored"
"we just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the NBC source reporting can be safely ignored"
Lmfao
Lmfao
maybe he’ll clock into work at 6am tomorrow and edit it if we harass his inbox
maybe he’ll clock into work at 6am tomorrow and edit it if we harass his inbox
bro deleted it
bro deleted it
I like giving back to the community
I like giving back to the community
I certainly don't know but there's money to be made to the person who does know
I certainly don't know but there's money to be made to the person who does know
we need foreign mentions
we need foreign mentions
Donated a double quarter pounder because I like the thrill
Donated a double quarter pounder because I like the thrill
to trade at night
to trade at night
Was Pitt there
Was Pitt there
<@252554263841079296> is gonna wake up and realize he argued for 3 hours and it seems like his counterparty knows less about the market than when it began 😭
<@252554263841079296> is gonna wake up and realize he argued for 3 hours and it seems like his counterparty knows less about the market than when it began 😭