Hyperliquidgm, looking for blunt feedback from HL vault managers / infra people VaultVision is thinking about a Manager OS layer. The idea: managers could run one vault that trades multiple market types: - HL crypto perps - HIP-3 markets: stocks / gold / oil / other perp markets - eventually outcomes / prediction markets Users would get the normal vault-like UX: deposit into one vault, manager trades, users get proportional PnL, withdrawals follow clear liquidity/unwind rules. VaultVision would handle: - accounting / shares / NAV - risk limits and policy checks - public proof page with TVL / drawdown / risk / deposit state - manager strategy context + reporting - eventually a simple manager console Not trying to launch a managed vault ourselves. Trying to understand if managers actually want this infra. Questions: 1. would you want to run a multi-market vault like this? 2. what is the hardest part: accounting, execution, trust, liquidity, regulation, or UX? 3. is this useful, or is current HL vault infra enough?
gm, looking for blunt feedback from HL vault managers / infra people VaultVision is thinking about a Manager OS layer. The idea: managers could run one vault that trades multiple market types: - HL crypto perps - HIP-3 markets: stocks / gold / oil / other perp markets - eventually outcomes / prediction markets Users would get the normal vault-like UX: deposit into one vault, manager trades, users get proportional PnL, withdrawals follow clear liquidity/unwind rules. VaultVision would handle: - accounting / shares / NAV - risk limits and policy checks - public proof page with TVL / drawdown / risk / deposit state - manager strategy context + reporting - eventually a simple manager console Not trying to launch a managed vault ourselves. Trying to understand if managers actually want this infra. Questions: 1. would you want to run a multi-market vault like this? 2. what is the hardest part: accounting, execution, trust, liquidity, regulation, or UX? 3. is this useful, or is current HL vault infra enough?