聊天记录
共 2 条，显示第 1-2 条
**4. Multiple resolution sources create avoidable disputes**
For the match referenced above, both ESPNcricinfo and the governing body/event organizer are listed as resolution sources. Even when the official organizer publishes the final result within minutes, market participants may hesitate to propose a resolution because ESPNcricinfo has not yet updated its page. This can lead to unnecessary disputes and delays despite an official result already being available.
**5. Community funds remain locked unnecessarily**
Delayed resolutions prevent users from accessing their funds promptly. Allowing markets to resolve based on official governing body or event organizer results would improve efficiency, reduce waiting times, and enhance the overall user experience.
### Request
I respectfully request that cricket match markets:
* Use the governing body or event organizer as the primary resolution source.
* Allow a consensus of credible reporting when necessary.
* Remove the mandatory 2-hour waiting period after match completion.
* Remove reliance on ESPNcricinfo as a required resolution source when official results are already available.
This would allow cricket markets to be resolved more quickly, reduce unnecessary disputes, and ensure community funds are released as soon as official match results are finalized.
**4. Multiple resolution sources create avoidable disputes**
For the match referenced above, both ESPNcricinfo and the governing body/event organizer are listed as resolution sources. Even when the official organizer publishes the final result within minutes, market participants may hesitate to propose a resolution because ESPNcricinfo has not yet updated its page. This can lead to unnecessary disputes and delays despite an official result already being available.
**5. Community funds remain locked unnecessarily**
Delayed resolutions prevent users from accessing their funds promptly. Allowing markets to resolve based on official governing body or event organizer results would improve efficiency, reduce waiting times, and enhance the overall user experience.
### Request
I respectfully request that cricket match markets:
* Use the governing body or event organizer as the primary resolution source.
* Allow a consensus of credible reporting when necessary.
* Remove the mandatory 2-hour waiting period after match completion.
* Remove reliance on ESPNcricinfo as a required resolution source when official results are already available.
This would allow cricket markets to be resolved more quickly, reduce unnecessary disputes, and ensure community funds are released as soon as official match results are finalized.
<@1272383282687905939> <@1457826843766947977> <@1212792946341183578>
**Proposal to Update Resolution Sources for Cricket Match Markets**
I would like to propose updating the resolution criteria for cricket match markets to align with the standards already used for Tennis, NBA, NHL, and other sports.
**Suggested Resolution Wording**
> This market refers to the cricket match between Bahrain and Myanmar scheduled for June 3, 2026, in the T20 ACC Premier Cup, Women. This market will resolve according to the finalized match result as published by the governing body or event organizers. If necessary, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
### Reasons for the Change
**1. Official cricket governing bodies already publish results promptly**
Major cricket organizations and event organizers such as ICC, IPL, ECB (T20 Blast), and other tournament operators publish official scores and match results on their own websites shortly after a match concludes. These should be considered the primary resolution source.
**2. ESPNcricinfo does not provide timely coverage for all matches**
Many lower-profile or regional cricket matches, such as the Bahrain vs Myanmar match mentioned above, are not covered live by ESPNcricinfo. In some cases, scores are not updated until several hours after the match has finished, creating unnecessary delays in market resolution.
**3. Cricket results are final once the match concludes**
Unlike some sports where post-match adjustments can affect the final score, cricket match results are generally finalized immediately upon completion of the match. Therefore, a mandatory waiting period before resolution is typically unnecessary.
<@1272383282687905939> <@1457826843766947977> <@1212792946341183578>
**Proposal to Update Resolution Sources for Cricket Match Markets**
I would like to propose updating the resolution criteria for cricket match markets to align with the standards already used for Tennis, NBA, NHL, and other sports.
**Suggested Resolution Wording**
> This market refers to the cricket match between Bahrain and Myanmar scheduled for June 3, 2026, in the T20 ACC Premier Cup, Women. This market will resolve according to the finalized match result as published by the governing body or event organizers. If necessary, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
### Reasons for the Change
**1. Official cricket governing bodies already publish results promptly**
Major cricket organizations and event organizers such as ICC, IPL, ECB (T20 Blast), and other tournament operators publish official scores and match results on their own websites shortly after a match concludes. These should be considered the primary resolution source.
**2. ESPNcricinfo does not provide timely coverage for all matches**
Many lower-profile or regional cricket matches, such as the Bahrain vs Myanmar match mentioned above, are not covered live by ESPNcricinfo. In some cases, scores are not updated until several hours after the match has finished, creating unnecessary delays in market resolution.
**3. Cricket results are final once the match concludes**
Unlike some sports where post-match adjustments can affect the final score, cricket match results are generally finalized immediately upon completion of the match. Therefore, a mandatory waiting period before resolution is typically unnecessary.
Polymarket