artifactcollector参与话题 0消息总数 8

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:27:47 ↗ Kalshi

actually I think it is possible to sell to open in web, just very uncommon imo

actually I think it is possible to sell to open in web, just very uncommon imo

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:25:26 ↗ Kalshi

right, in API selling yes could well be open which is not possible in UI, so the feed could mean either

right, in API selling yes could well be open which is not possible in UI, so the feed could mean either

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:24:18 ↗ Kalshi

I meant opening yes vs closing no, and vice versa

I meant opening yes vs closing no, and vice versa

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:22:02 ↗ Kalshi

I see. Explains why it always looked inconsistent if I assumed it showed the taker action

I see. Explains why it always looked inconsistent if I assumed it showed the taker action

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:19:52 ↗ Kalshi

does this not show that?

does this not show that?

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:17:56 ↗ Kalshi

The UI feed seems to be another way though it's presented in a confusing way, like it's unclear whether it shows the taker or maker action

The UI feed seems to be another way though it's presented in a confusing way, like it's unclear whether it shows the taker or maker action

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:15:12 ↗ Kalshi

but there's no way to distinguish between a buy no and sell yes?

but there's no way to distinguish between a buy no and sell yes?

artifactcollector 2026-07-09 05:06:50 ↗ Kalshi

is it the case that get_trades no longer exposes whether taker is buying or selling?

is it the case that get_trades no longer exposes whether taker is buying or selling?