under the hood, selling no is just going long, or creating a bid order
under the hood, selling no is just going long, or creating a bid order
该用户的聊天记录定位。
under the hood, selling no is just going long, or creating a bid order
under the hood, selling no is just going long, or creating a bid order
oh nice, thx
oh nice, thx
Has anyone encountered frequent expired orders with reason ORD_REJECT_REASON_EXCHANGE_OPTION on poly US?
Has anyone encountered frequent expired orders with reason ORD_REJECT_REASON_EXCHANGE_OPTION on poly US?
anyone know current taker delays on US sports (on poly us)?
anyone know current taker delays on US sports (on poly us)?
excellent
excellent
thank you im happy to join 😂
thank you im happy to join 😂
have you found the orderbook websockets reliable? and do the updates come thru in sync for both tokens on the same orderbook?
have you found the orderbook websockets reliable? and do the updates come thru in sync for both tokens on the same orderbook?
oof
oof
thank you. it was surprisingly difficult to find this clarification in the docs
thank you. it was surprisingly difficult to find this clarification in the docs
I had the same assumption, but the clob api tells me they are essentially just mirrors of each other 🫤
I had the same assumption, but the clob api tells me they are essentially just mirrors of each other 🫤
Sorry -- maybe my vocabulary was wrong. There is one *market* for the winner with two outcomes -- Team A and Team B
Sorry -- maybe my vocabulary was wrong. There is one *market* for the winner with two outcomes -- Team A and Team B
Thanks. Yes, YES and NO are separate markets -- so I'm wondering why they have the exact same (inversed) liquidity in the response I showed above (where the first bid/ask is team A and the second bid/ask is team B). I'm essentially wondering if I need to sum team A asks with team B bids to get the total liquidity available for team A to win. That would seem suspect given the liquidity is exactly the same across the two (679926.76)
Thanks. Yes, YES and NO are separate markets -- so I'm wondering why they have the exact same (inversed) liquidity in the response I showed above (where the first bid/ask is team A and the second bid/ask is team B). I'm essentially wondering if I need to sum team A asks with team B bids to get the total liquidity available for team A to win. That would seem suspect given the liquidity is exactly the same across the two (679926.76)
Dumb question from a dev coming from kalshi. For a market that has two mutually exclusive outcomes (e.g. Knicks / Spurs moneyline), will the orderbooks come back merged from the clob api? For example, would the best bid for knicks ever not have the same amount of liquidity as the best ask for the Spurs? ``` ➜ ~ curl -sS -X POST 'https://clob.polymarket.com/books' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '[ {"token_id": "46476571633828462836475465912978735855757483955249703286193576900705262818709"}, {"token_id": "21824609976117105848555444850550421549651562100464735804855968490014825878128"} ]' | jq '.[] | {asset_id, neg_risk, best_bid: .bids[-1], best_ask: .asks[-1]}' { "asset_id": "46476571633828462836475465912978735855757483955249703286193576900705262818709", "neg_risk": false, "best_bid": { "price": "0.36", "size": "1365482.25" }, "best_ask": { "price": "0.37", "size": "679926.76" } } { "asset_id": "21824609976117105848555444850550421549651562100464735804855968490014825878128", "neg_risk": false, "best_bid": { "price": "0.63", "size": "679926.76" }, "best_ask": { "price": "0.64", "size": "1365482.25" } } ```
Dumb question from a dev coming from kalshi. For a market that has two mutually exclusive outcomes (e.g. Knicks / Spurs moneyline), will the orderbooks come back merged from the clob api? For example, would the best bid for knicks ever not have the same amount of liquidity as the best ask for the Spurs? ``` ➜ ~ curl -sS -X POST 'https://clob.polymarket.com/books' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '[ {"token_id": "46476571633828462836475465912978735855757483955249703286193576900705262818709"}, {"token_id": "21824609976117105848555444850550421549651562100464735804855968490014825878128"} ]' | jq '.[] | {asset_id, neg_risk, best_bid: .bids[-1], best_ask: .asks[-1]}' { "asset_id": "46476571633828462836475465912978735855757483955249703286193576900705262818709", "neg_risk": false, "best_bid": { "price": "0.36", "size": "1365482.25" }, "best_ask": { "price": "0.37", "size": "679926.76" } } { "asset_id": "21824609976117105848555444850550421549651562100464735804855968490014825878128", "neg_risk": false, "best_bid": { "price": "0.63", "size": "679926.76" }, "best_ask": { "price": "0.64", "size": "1365482.25" } } ```