Polymarket<@886004822669664286> didn't you lost like 100k?
<@886004822669664286> didn't you lost like 100k?
Analista.参与话题 9消息总数 501
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 501 条，显示第 251-300 条I said it was not an announcement
I said it was not an announcement
yeah sure so it's not a one way announcement
yeah sure so it's not a one way announcement
nor with announcement
nor with announcement
Perm peace can resolve on signing or "formally adopting"
Perm peace can resolve on signing or "formally adopting"
wrong
wrong
DEI policy
DEI policy
dispute
dispute
delete
delete
Great times
Great times
Remember the somali strike scam?
Remember the somali strike scam?
could be somali
could be somali
He didn't said what timezone
He didn't said what timezone
dispute
dispute
Needs to be disputed
Needs to be disputed
I do share some contreversial view sometimes but I never lie
I do share some contreversial view sometimes but I never lie
Yall so hard with me
Yall so hard with me
It's not gonna stop the shitpost
It's not gonna stop the shitpost
5 sec slowmode is a joke
5 sec slowmode is a joke
agree
agree
bro
bro
after dispute
after dispute
More date strikes for new Iran agreement/ceasefire market
More date strikes for new Iran agreement/ceasefire market
but nothing from team yet afaik
but nothing from team yet afaik
So is now possible to do parlays?
So is now possible to do parlays?
Since a couple of week
Since a couple of week
Internet will resolve 50/50
Internet will resolve 50/50
Rn is tiny
Rn is tiny
They could just add that and that's it
They could just add that and that's it
no?
no?
Ok so if no blackout market would just resolve to "other"
Ok so if no blackout market would just resolve to "other"
Shouldn't there be an hidden option? like "other" shares?
Shouldn't there be an hidden option? like "other" shares?
If no blackout ofc
If no blackout ofc
Both market should resolve no
Both market should resolve no
No?
No?
So he'll just lose one?
So he'll just lose one?
This guy holds 10k on each side
This guy holds 10k on each side
They can't misresolve this
They can't misresolve this
How can they be so retarted
How can they be so retarted
Market?
Market?
It's just the less effort thing they could do, which seems to be the standard
It's just the less effort thing they could do, which seems to be the standard
P4 The June 10 statement does not qualify. Per ABC News: "U.S. officials have said that the efforts have not been a revival of Project Freedom, the short-lived U.S. military initiative to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. Rather, this most recent effort was a coordination effort where shippers could contact U.S. Central Command and in turn, receive information about where to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official." An information service is not a program to "escort, protect, or retrieve" ships, and the government's own characterization explicitly denies the equivalence the YES case requires. https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533 The components that might resemble protection were never announced. The air cover system via the Omani route is known only through "three people with knowledge of the transits" per the Financial Times, and the military security aboard commercial vessels only through anonymous sources per NBC News. No official has publicly confirmed or committed to either. The rules expressly exclude "reported preparations, or other non-definitive statements." https://www.ft.com/content/31450147-1b85-4ecf-a60d-0c0e3a298ae7 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-commercial-ships-military-security-hormuz-transit-sources-say-rcna343742 Trump's statement itself is a retrospective results report on a secret mission, disclosed in his words "because they just figured it out." It contains no definitive commitment that any program will be restarted. His only forward-looking comments, telling Fox News he was weighing a renewed operation but had made no final decision, are precisely the "expressions of openness" the rules disqualify. https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533
P4 The June 10 statement does not qualify. Per ABC News: "U.S. officials have said that the efforts have not been a revival of Project Freedom, the short-lived U.S. military initiative to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. Rather, this most recent effort was a coordination effort where shippers could contact U.S. Central Command and in turn, receive information about where to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official." An information service is not a program to "escort, protect, or retrieve" ships, and the government's own characterization explicitly denies the equivalence the YES case requires. https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533 The components that might resemble protection were never announced. The air cover system via the Omani route is known only through "three people with knowledge of the transits" per the Financial Times, and the military security aboard commercial vessels only through anonymous sources per NBC News. No official has publicly confirmed or committed to either. The rules expressly exclude "reported preparations, or other non-definitive statements." https://www.ft.com/content/31450147-1b85-4ecf-a60d-0c0e3a298ae7 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-commercial-ships-military-security-hormuz-transit-sources-say-rcna343742 Trump's statement itself is a retrospective results report on a secret mission, disclosed in his words "because they just figured it out." It contains no definitive commitment that any program will be restarted. His only forward-looking comments, telling Fox News he was weighing a renewed operation but had made no final decision, are precisely the "expressions of openness" the rules disqualify. https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533
P4
P4
But yeah
But yeah
It looks more like an MQ 9 reaper
It looks more like an MQ 9 reaper
This is has nothing to do with what project freedom was nor anything with escorting ships
This is has nothing to do with what project freedom was nor anything with escorting ships
That's all about it
That's all about it
Clearly
Clearly
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
Share on UMA i cannot
Share on UMA i cannot