聊天记录
共 501 条，显示第 301-350 条
P4
The June 10 statement does not qualify. Per ABC News: "U.S. officials have said that the efforts have not been a revival of Project Freedom, the short-lived U.S. military initiative to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. Rather, this most recent effort was a coordination effort where shippers could contact U.S. Central Command and in turn, receive information about where to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official." An information service is not a program to "escort, protect, or retrieve" ships, and the government's own characterization explicitly denies the equivalence the YES case requires.
https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533
The components that might resemble protection were never announced. The air cover system via the Omani route is known only through "three people with knowledge of the transits" per the Financial Times, and the military security aboard commercial vessels only through anonymous sources per NBC News. No official has publicly confirmed or committed to either. The rules expressly exclude "reported preparations, or other non-definitive statements."
https://www.ft.com/content/31450147-1b85-4ecf-a60d-0c0e3a298ae7
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-commercial-ships-military-security-hormuz-transit-sources-say-rcna343742
Trump's statement itself is a retrospective results report on a secret mission, disclosed in his words "because they just figured it out." It contains no definitive commitment that any program will be restarted. His only forward-looking comments, telling Fox News he was weighing a renewed operation but had made no final decision, are precisely the "expressions of openness" the rules disqualify.
https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533
P4
The June 10 statement does not qualify. Per ABC News: "U.S. officials have said that the efforts have not been a revival of Project Freedom, the short-lived U.S. military initiative to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. Rather, this most recent effort was a coordination effort where shippers could contact U.S. Central Command and in turn, receive information about where to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official." An information service is not a program to "escort, protect, or retrieve" ships, and the government's own characterization explicitly denies the equivalence the YES case requires.
https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533
The components that might resemble protection were never announced. The air cover system via the Omani route is known only through "three people with knowledge of the transits" per the Financial Times, and the military security aboard commercial vessels only through anonymous sources per NBC News. No official has publicly confirmed or committed to either. The rules expressly exclude "reported preparations, or other non-definitive statements."
https://www.ft.com/content/31450147-1b85-4ecf-a60d-0c0e3a298ae7
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-commercial-ships-military-security-hormuz-transit-sources-say-rcna343742
Trump's statement itself is a retrospective results report on a secret mission, disclosed in his words "because they just figured it out." It contains no definitive commitment that any program will be restarted. His only forward-looking comments, telling Fox News he was weighing a renewed operation but had made no final decision, are precisely the "expressions of openness" the rules disqualify.
https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-claims-100-million-barrels-oil-200-ships/story?id=133759533
Where they are providing info to vessel freely transiting the strait, yes. Not escorting it
Where they are providing info to vessel freely transiting the strait, yes. Not escorting it
It's nothing like project freedom, regardless of what autistic hegseth says
It's nothing like project freedom, regardless of what autistic hegseth says
This was never denied, but it's not escorting ships
This was never denied, but it's not escorting ships
this is being said in the news
this is being said in the news
Escorted?
Escorted?
> U.S. forces are not escorting vessels, a defense official told CNBC last week. The military is communicating and coordinating with ships that seek to freely and safely transit Hormuz, the official said.
This didn't qualify last week and still apply, nothing changed since
> U.S. forces are not escorting vessels, a defense official told CNBC last week. The military is communicating and coordinating with ships that seek to freely and safely transit Hormuz, the official said.
This didn't qualify last week and still apply, nothing changed since
How did they protect these vessels explain me
How did they protect these vessels explain me
where is the protection?
where is the protection?
Is nothing like project freedom
Is nothing like project freedom
This is not an escorting program
This is not an escorting program
> U.S. forces are not escorting vessels, a defense official told CNBC last week. The military is communicating and coordinating with ships that seek to freely and safely transit Hormuz, the official said.
> U.S. forces are not escorting vessels, a defense official told CNBC last week. The military is communicating and coordinating with ships that seek to freely and safely transit Hormuz, the official said.
Air supports is neither escorting, protection or retrieve of these ships, is watching them from the above and sharing intel
Air supports is neither escorting, protection or retrieve of these ships, is watching them from the above and sharing intel
Rules are being stretched to fit Trump's truth post
Rules are being stretched to fit Trump's truth post
There are multiple problems with this
There are multiple problems with this
Also
Also
Exactly, so imagine you imagined that the operation was carried in secret and bet on it (against it being announced). It get disclosed at the end of it and magically it becames an announcment of restarting it???
Exactly, so imagine you imagined that the operation was carried in secret and bet on it (against it being announced). It get disclosed at the end of it and magically it becames an announcment of restarting it???
Can someone explaining me how did they "*escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships*"?
Can someone explaining me how did they "*escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships*"?
crazy
crazy
It was my dad birthday couldn't follow
It was my dad birthday couldn't follow
1) The rules are clearly about a forward looking announcement, not a secret operation being disclosed later.
2) rules are about "escort, protect, or retrieve" not giving information about safe routes
1) The rules are clearly about a forward looking announcement, not a secret operation being disclosed later.
2) rules are about "escort, protect, or retrieve" not giving information about safe routes
No
No
Did we lost our fucking mind
Did we lost our fucking mind
> An announcement explicitly stating that “Project Freedom” will be restarted will qualify. Additionally, any announcement of a substantially equivalent United States military program to escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships in or through the Strait of Hormuz will qualify.
> An announcement explicitly stating that “Project Freedom” will be restarted will qualify. Additionally, any announcement of a substantially equivalent United States military program to escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships in or through the Strait of Hormuz will qualify.
Rather, this most recent effort was a coordination effort where shippers could contact U.S. Central Command and in turn, receive information about where to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official.
Rather, this most recent effort was a coordination effort where shippers could contact U.S. Central Command and in turn, receive information about where to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official.
Damn this is the first good dinner you shared
Damn this is the first good dinner you shared
not really
not really
why are you listening drake worse album ever vro
why are you listening drake worse album ever vro
vro
vro
I guess chances of splitting a jackpot are separate from the chances of hitting the numbers
I guess chances of splitting a jackpot are separate from the chances of hitting the numbers
literally says won't improve your chance of winning
literally says won't improve your chance of winning
<@744559907944005634> knew
<@744559907944005634> knew
send me address
send me address
Yeah I'm willing to pay 10k for silver
Yeah I'm willing to pay 10k for silver
what the fuck is this based on
what the fuck is this based on
Also Car is bronze
Also Car is bronze
what the fuck is this
what the fuck is this
Don't worry that if indefinitive we'll know in less than 12h
Don't worry that if indefinitive we'll know in less than 12h
bro doesn't mean anything. Market requires the deadline to be extended, and yall taking for granted it's indefinitive, which is false
bro doesn't mean anything. Market requires the deadline to be extended, and yall taking for granted it's indefinitive, which is false
Doesn't matter, and yall keep forgetting that even if the ceasefire negotiated with lebanon was violated by hezbollah, is still an agreement between ISR and LEB gov
Doesn't matter, and yall keep forgetting that even if the ceasefire negotiated with lebanon was violated by hezbollah, is still an agreement between ISR and LEB gov
It's not that they agreed terms different to before
It's not that they agreed terms different to before
They agreed to implement the ceasefire again
They agreed to implement the ceasefire again
it's not bro
it's not bro
why are we assuming shit i don't understand
why are we assuming shit i don't understand
A newly agreed-upon broader peace deal will qualify **__if it includes Israel's agreement to a ceasefire extension.__**
A newly agreed-upon broader peace deal will qualify **__if it includes Israel's agreement to a ceasefire extension.__**
In the crazy remote chance there is you are right we'll definetly see someone noticing that the previous ceasefire was set to expire at EOM and it will surely be reported.
But since they'll just meet again on the 22 it is clear that is either linked to that date
> The two parties agreed to reconvene the political and security tracks the week of June 22, with a view toward reaching a comprehensive agreement.
Or either to the original 29 june deadline
In the crazy remote chance there is you are right we'll definetly see someone noticing that the previous ceasefire was set to expire at EOM and it will surely be reported.
But since they'll just meet again on the 22 it is clear that is either linked to that date
> The two parties agreed to reconvene the political and security tracks the week of June 22, with a view toward reaching a comprehensive agreement.
Or either to the original 29 june deadline
The two parties agreed to reconvene the political and security tracks the week of June 22
you cut a part here huh
The two parties agreed to reconvene the political and security tracks the week of June 22
you cut a part here huh
I'm not i know what I'm talking about
I'm not i know what I'm talking about
Clearly linked to negotiations
Clearly linked to negotiations
The two parties agreed to reconvene the political and security tracks the week of June 22, with a view toward reaching a comprehensive agreement.
The two parties agreed to reconvene the political and security tracks the week of June 22, with a view toward reaching a comprehensive agreement.
Polymarket