none of which falls under the categories specified under the 2nd clause
none of which falls under the categories specified under the 2nd clause
该用户的聊天记录定位。
none of which falls under the categories specified under the 2nd clause
none of which falls under the categories specified under the 2nd clause
I don't think you understand what discretion means
I don't think you understand what discretion means
this is irrelevant. the review process doesn't concern model's public release. just because it correlates chronologically doesn't mean anything
this is irrelevant. the review process doesn't concern model's public release. just because it correlates chronologically doesn't mean anything
A qualifying review process may apply to a) artificial intelligence models generally, b) only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or c) to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. Where does it say models that elect to join this process? All 3 criteria require US gvt discretion
A qualifying review process may apply to a) artificial intelligence models generally, b) only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or c) to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. Where does it say models that elect to join this process? All 3 criteria require US gvt discretion
the review process doesn't concern the public release.
the review process doesn't concern the public release.
first clause: review process for the public release - not been met. second clause: A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. - not been met. the rest is self-explanatory
first clause: review process for the public release - not been met. second clause: A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. - not been met. the rest is self-explanatory
can we just vacuum clean this market?
can we just vacuum clean this market?
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-orders-federal-review-for-ai-model-releases-by-may-31/trump-orders-federal-review-of-ai-model-releases-by-june-30
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-orders-federal-review-for-ai-model-releases-by-may-31/trump-orders-federal-review-of-ai-model-releases-by-june-30
No one is proposing
No one is proposing
Top shareholders have a serious chat in the market comments lmao
Top shareholders have a serious chat in the market comments lmao
@bosurm
@bosurm
ESLest man alive
ESLest man alive
it's retroactive, not active
it's retroactive, not active
he will keep buying
he will keep buying
buy like 10 shares and spam comments
buy like 10 shares and spam comments
tell it to honest-owl
tell it to honest-owl
# Are You Effing Crazy?!
# Are You Effing Crazy?!
pump pump
pump pump
lmao
lmao
couldn't have said it better
couldn't have said it better
first clause: review process for the public release - not been met. second clause: A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. - not been met. the rest is self-explanatory
first clause: review process for the public release - not been met. second clause: A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government. - not been met. the rest is self-explanatory
literally none of the clauses have been met
literally none of the clauses have been met
this doesn't even look proposable
this doesn't even look proposable
its not impossible but I doubt it
its not impossible but I doubt it
at a sweet price of 61c... it was trading at 25c yesterday
at a sweet price of 61c... it was trading at 25c yesterday
rules look very firm to me
rules look very firm to me
pretty sure he market bought as well
pretty sure he market bought as well
not really, with an entry price of 61c, looks like a regular new user
not really, with an entry price of 61c, looks like a regular new user
comically evil lmao
comically evil lmao
victormax77 sounds like a 50 year old eastern european fat retard
victormax77 sounds like a 50 year old eastern european fat retard
it looks pretty dark for the yestards
it looks pretty dark for the yestards
It's formally active
It's formally active
Exactly
Exactly
It doesn't mean its qualifying
It doesn't mean its qualifying
Announcement can be "if an asteroid falls, there will be a ceasefire"
Announcement can be "if an asteroid falls, there will be a ceasefire"
And the announcement is not qualifying. Read the other clauses too
And the announcement is not qualifying. Read the other clauses too
It will not go into place if hezbollah disagrees
It will not go into place if hezbollah disagrees
No, it means that the announcement is conditional rather than definitive
No, it means that the announcement is conditional rather than definitive
Read the article
Read the article
So its conditional
So its conditional
this market sitting at 50 50 doesn't feel right
this market sitting at 50 50 doesn't feel right
@bosurm
@bosurm
it is obviously a deescalation measure as I said earlier
it is obviously a deescalation measure as I said earlier
no, as it is currently in effect
no, as it is currently in effect
if you think this counts you're fucking crazy
if you think this counts you're fucking crazy
it didn't explicitly agree to anything at all! talks continue on the week of June 22! read the fucking statement
it didn't explicitly agree to anything at all! talks continue on the week of June 22! read the fucking statement
possibly, but it doesnt extend the ceasefire beyond june 30
possibly, but it doesnt extend the ceasefire beyond june 30
?
?
where was a definitive, explicit extension beyond june 30 announced? please cite it
where was a definitive, explicit extension beyond june 30 announced? please cite it
exactly
exactly