该用户的聊天记录定位。
Al Jazeera correspondent: “What happened today is a roadmap paving the way for the implementation of a ceasefire later... And this roadmap faces a challenging path ahead.”
Al Jazeera correspondent: “What happened today is a roadmap paving the way for the implementation of a ceasefire later... And this roadmap faces a challenging path ahead.”
extension, meaning beyond june 30
extension, meaning beyond june 30
A newly agreed-upon broader peace deal will qualify if it includes Israel's agreement to a ceasefire extension.
A newly agreed-upon broader peace deal will qualify if it includes Israel's agreement to a ceasefire extension.
# "evacuation of all Hizbollah operatives from the South Litani Sector." is a deescalation measure. Since ceasefire doesn't explicitly go beyond June 30, this statement alone doesn't qualify
# "evacuation of all Hizbollah operatives from the South Litani Sector." is a deescalation measure. Since ceasefire doesn't explicitly go beyond June 30, this statement alone doesn't qualify
its an indefinite deescalation measure, nowhere does israel cease to fire
its an indefinite deescalation measure, nowhere does israel cease to fire
rules are pretty strict, it has to be explicitly beyond june 30
rules are pretty strict, it has to be explicitly beyond june 30
Either way, he is arguing that the review is not required to concern the public release, but even supposing that the 2nd clause is poorly written, it also contradicts the 1st clause
Either way, he is arguing that the review is not required to concern the public release, but even supposing that the 2nd clause is poorly written, it also contradicts the 1st clause
The review must concern the public release, rather than the mechanics of the model
The review must concern the public release, rather than the mechanics of the model
It contradicts the first clause in any case
It contradicts the first clause in any case
Did you argue for 3 hours to sell everything at 50c?
Did you argue for 3 hours to sell everything at 50c?
Idk why analista is selling all his shares
Idk why analista is selling all his shares
I know ngga
I know ngga
I asked fuck he meant
I asked fuck he meant
he was joking i guess
he was joking i guess
In this chat
In this chat
It was with the MSTR market
It was with the MSTR market
He once told me "fuck you" because I asked him what he meant
He once told me "fuck you" because I asked him what he meant
Review or approve the release to the public. I'm not sure what you mean here
Review or approve the release to the public. I'm not sure what you mean here
But pre-release doesn't imply that review concerns its release. It's a confusion of causation and correlation
But pre-release doesn't imply that review concerns its release. It's a confusion of causation and correlation
As per the 2nd clause, it is strictly required that the review process must concern the public release of the model
As per the 2nd clause, it is strictly required that the review process must concern the public release of the model
There is a review of public release of the model? Can you cite it?
There is a review of public release of the model? Can you cite it?
approval
approval
responsibility is the functional missing point here
responsibility is the functional missing point here
for public release, functionally implies an approval of sorts
for public release, functionally implies an approval of sorts
analista is right
analista is right
I guess overseeing and early access are different. You're probablyright
I guess overseeing and early access are different. You're probablyright
it's a federal process, and it's a review. no?
it's a federal process, and it's a review. no?
it can be 2 things at once, but I think it meets the definition of a review
it can be 2 things at once, but I think it meets the definition of a review
isn't that a review?
isn't that a review?
assessment of advanced cyber capabilities, determination of which models qualify as “covered frontier models,” and engagement with the government on models under development before release
assessment of advanced cyber capabilities, determination of which models qualify as “covered frontier models,” and engagement with the government on models under development before release
I mean that I don't think that's the requirement according to the rules. obviously what the white house released doesn't constitute an approval mechanism, but it's more or less a review process
I mean that I don't think that's the requirement according to the rules. obviously what the white house released doesn't constitute an approval mechanism, but it's more or less a review process
from the rules, I tend to think it means an approval requirement of sorts, but strictly speaking, I don't think that's the case
from the rules, I tend to think it means an approval requirement of sorts, but strictly speaking, I don't think that's the case
someone in the comments mentioned that it constitutes a federal review/designation process
someone in the comments mentioned that it constitutes a federal review/designation process
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-orders-federal-review-for-ai-model-releases-by-may-31/trump-orders-federal-review-of-ai-model-releases-by-june-30
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-orders-federal-review-for-ai-model-releases-by-may-31/trump-orders-federal-review-of-ai-model-releases-by-june-30
lisuride, metergoline, phenibut
lisuride, metergoline, phenibut
caffeine anhydrous pills
caffeine anhydrous pills
ask the normies fallacy
ask the normies fallacy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFgcqB8-AxE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFgcqB8-AxE
domercrat
domercrat
he's also arguing that it should be unwritten
he's also arguing that it should be unwritten
https://polymarket.com/event/another-iranian-diplomat-expelled-by-june-30
https://polymarket.com/event/another-iranian-diplomat-expelled-by-june-30
trump confirming his own insult isn't a credible source of confirmation
trump confirming his own insult isn't a credible source of confirmation
weren't you arguing N ngga
weren't you arguing N ngga
its a descriptive term, not an insult
its a descriptive term, not an insult
It is not an insult, it is a question. Like how you ask people “are you crazy” etc
It is not an insult, it is a question. Like how you ask people “are you crazy” etc
"did you say that he was a piece of shit? did you speak to him on these terms?" "I did."
"did you say that he was a piece of shit? did you speak to him on these terms?" "I did."
rhetorical question = definitive
rhetorical question = definitive
yes?
yes?
"are you a piece of shit?"
"are you a piece of shit?"
it's an equivalent
it's an equivalent
Polymarket