该用户的聊天记录定位。
It suddenly seems like all comments (in the comments section on markets) are abbreviated without a way to expand them to full length Clicking on a comment used to expand it, no longer (Chrome on android)
It suddenly seems like all comments (in the comments section on markets) are abbreviated without a way to expand them to full length Clicking on a comment used to expand it, no longer (Chrome on android)
Please resolve YES: https://polymarket.com/event/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-may-31/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-june-30 "NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN [...] that a vacancy exists in the office of Combined Authority Mayor for the Greater Manchester Combined Authority area. The vacancy occurred on Friday 19 June 2026" https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/news/vacancy-in-the-office-of-the-greater-manchester-combined-authority-mayor/ "He had seven days - from the moment of his election - to resign from the post which he has held for almost a decade. He handed in his resignation on 19 June - triggering the process of the by-election." https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2026-06-19/what-happens-next-with-greater-manchester-mayoralty-after-burnhams-win "Andy Burnham relinquished his role as Mayor of Greater Manchester with immediate effect" "Paul Dennett, the current deputy mayor, has become interim Mayor of Greater Manchester" https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/andy-burnham-mayor-greater-manchester-prime-minister-5Hjdbpb_2/
Please resolve YES: https://polymarket.com/event/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-may-31/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-june-30 "NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN [...] that a vacancy exists in the office of Combined Authority Mayor for the Greater Manchester Combined Authority area. The vacancy occurred on Friday 19 June 2026" https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/news/vacancy-in-the-office-of-the-greater-manchester-combined-authority-mayor/ "He had seven days - from the moment of his election - to resign from the post which he has held for almost a decade. He handed in his resignation on 19 June - triggering the process of the by-election." https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2026-06-19/what-happens-next-with-greater-manchester-mayoralty-after-burnhams-win "Andy Burnham relinquished his role as Mayor of Greater Manchester with immediate effect" "Paul Dennett, the current deputy mayor, has become interim Mayor of Greater Manchester" https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/andy-burnham-mayor-greater-manchester-prime-minister-5Hjdbpb_2/
https://polymarket.com/event/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-may-31/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-june-30 Please propose YES. Andy Burnham is officially no longer mayor. Paul Bennett is now acting mayor. https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/news/vacancy-in-the-office-of-the-greater-manchester-combined-authority-mayor/ https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/andy-burnham-mayor-greater-manchester-prime-minister-5Hjdbpb_2/
https://polymarket.com/event/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-may-31/andy-burnham-out-as-mayor-of-greater-manchester-by-june-30 Please propose YES. Andy Burnham is officially no longer mayor. Paul Bennett is now acting mayor. https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/news/vacancy-in-the-office-of-the-greater-manchester-combined-authority-mayor/ https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/andy-burnham-mayor-greater-manchester-prime-minister-5Hjdbpb_2/
Thank you.
Thank you.
Proposal needs disputing: https://polymarket.com/event/will-spencer-pratt-concede-by-20260608151036178 It's proposed NO, but mainstream media overwhelmingly reported he conceded on the 12th: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pratt-concedes-la-mayor-race-scathing-video-teasing-next-move-bombshell-info-holds-commie-animals https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/jun/12/spencer-pratt-concedes-la-mayor-race-claims-damaging-video-candidate/ https://www.ms.now/news/spencer-pratt-concedes-la-mayoral-race-with-combative-message https://variety.com/2026/politics/news/spencer-pratt-concedes-mayor-race-1236780020/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/12/spencer-pratt-concedes-la-mayor-race https://ew.com/spencer-pratt-declares-war-on-commie-animals-after-conceding-la-election-11997517 https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398266927112 Edit: the odds were around 40 percent a couple of hours ago. Panic selling due to the proposal, i suppose. And i dont have 750 to dispute myself, but i think the dispute is valid and it should be proposed YES
Proposal needs disputing: https://polymarket.com/event/will-spencer-pratt-concede-by-20260608151036178 It's proposed NO, but mainstream media overwhelmingly reported he conceded on the 12th: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pratt-concedes-la-mayor-race-scathing-video-teasing-next-move-bombshell-info-holds-commie-animals https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/jun/12/spencer-pratt-concedes-la-mayor-race-claims-damaging-video-candidate/ https://www.ms.now/news/spencer-pratt-concedes-la-mayoral-race-with-combative-message https://variety.com/2026/politics/news/spencer-pratt-concedes-mayor-race-1236780020/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/12/spencer-pratt-concedes-la-mayor-race https://ew.com/spencer-pratt-declares-war-on-commie-animals-after-conceding-la-election-11997517 https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398266927112 Edit: the odds were around 40 percent a couple of hours ago. Panic selling due to the proposal, i suppose. And i dont have 750 to dispute myself, but i think the dispute is valid and it should be proposed YES
(And if I misunderstand the resolution rules, please explain why; but the winner market used the same phrasing about official results or consensus of reporting, so since that could resolve I fail to see why this one can't.)
(And if I misunderstand the resolution rules, please explain why; but the winner market used the same phrasing about official results or consensus of reporting, so since that could resolve I fail to see why this one can't.)
https://polymarket.com/event/georgia-governor-republican-primary-runoff-margin-of-victory-20260611155243082 The four brackets for candidate "Jones" are all proposable NO, because Jones lost the election, and the market on that question has settled to that effect: https://polymarket.com/event/georgia-governor-republican-primary-winner
https://polymarket.com/event/georgia-governor-republican-primary-runoff-margin-of-victory-20260611155243082 The four brackets for candidate "Jones" are all proposable NO, because Jones lost the election, and the market on that question has settled to that effect: https://polymarket.com/event/georgia-governor-republican-primary-winner
https://polymarket.com/event/georgia-governor-republican-primary-runoff-margin-of-victory-20260611155243082/will-rick-jackson-win-the-georgia-republican-governor-primary-runoff-by-1015-20260611155244280 The main market for this primary already resolved to "Jackson wins", so all the brackets here for Jones to win can safely be resolved NO
https://polymarket.com/event/georgia-governor-republican-primary-runoff-margin-of-victory-20260611155243082/will-rick-jackson-win-the-georgia-republican-governor-primary-runoff-by-1015-20260611155244280 The main market for this primary already resolved to "Jackson wins", so all the brackets here for Jones to win can safely be resolved NO
Cant you just wait for the june 15 dispute to resolve and clear up the question?
Cant you just wait for the june 15 dispute to resolve and clear up the question?
Are you sure it was not actually a legitimate YES strictly by the market rules? Even an agreement that they will discuss nuclear stuff later is still an agreement involving nuclear stuff
Are you sure it was not actually a legitimate YES strictly by the market rules? Even an agreement that they will discuss nuclear stuff later is still an agreement involving nuclear stuff
(dont know if that has been proposed/considered before; am new here.)
(dont know if that has been proposed/considered before; am new here.)
Feature request: a way for date-based markets ("will X happen by date Y") to be linked, sort of similarly to negrisk markets, but rather, linked resolution-wise so that resolving one YES automagically resolves all later YES, and resolving one NO all earlier ones NO. And while a proposal/dispute is ongoing on one, lock the ability to propose separately on those that would co-resolve. Then you dont get 10 uma threads on the same argument, and more importantly, noone needs to dispute 10 proposals simultaneously to stop a bogus resolution.
Feature request: a way for date-based markets ("will X happen by date Y") to be linked, sort of similarly to negrisk markets, but rather, linked resolution-wise so that resolving one YES automagically resolves all later YES, and resolving one NO all earlier ones NO. And while a proposal/dispute is ongoing on one, lock the ability to propose separately on those that would co-resolve. Then you dont get 10 uma threads on the same argument, and more importantly, noone needs to dispute 10 proposals simultaneously to stop a bogus resolution.
Polymarket