聊天记录
共 7 条,显示第 1-7 条
That would be reasonable, but there could also be a short matching window where bid amount would play the primary role (i.e. price-time priority). It’s odd this doesn’t seem to be documented anywhere.
That would be reasonable, but there could also be a short matching window where bid amount would play the primary role (i.e. price-time priority). It’s odd this doesn’t seem to be documented anywhere.
Is anything documented about PM’s matching priority logic? I’m wondering how competing taker orders arriving within a short time period are prioritized when matching a maker.
Is anything documented about PM’s matching priority logic? I’m wondering how competing taker orders arriving within a short time period are prioritized when matching a maker.
For colocation in eu-west-2, is there a direct CLOB endpoint available that bypasses cloudflare?
For colocation in eu-west-2, is there a direct CLOB endpoint available that bypasses cloudflare?
Any early indications of market shifts since the taker bypass was closed? Any of the big winners suddenly vanish?
Any early indications of market shifts since the taker bypass was closed? Any of the big winners suddenly vanish?
How does taker bypass going away benefit other takers who weren’t using it? Just less competition now?
How does taker bypass going away benefit other takers who weren’t using it? Just less competition now?
Unclear how often that was being exploited but should be a big improvement for makers
Unclear how often that was being exploited but should be a big improvement for makers
I’m trying to understand what is so significant about the taker cancellation fix going out today. Before this was there a way to send a taker order and pull it back within 250ms?
I’m trying to understand what is so significant about the taker cancellation fix going out today. Before this was there a way to send a taker order and pull it back within 250ms?