Which bridge would that be now that the original arbitrum bridge is almost empty?
Which bridge would that be now that the original arbitrum bridge is almost empty?
该用户的聊天记录定位。
Which bridge would that be now that the original arbitrum bridge is almost empty?
Which bridge would that be now that the original arbitrum bridge is almost empty?
How do I get my money out of hyperliquid once the bridge is empty?
How do I get my money out of hyperliquid once the bridge is empty?
I agree it's Abit vague but I'm sure we recall that there were incidents where it appeared as if binance insiders (allegedly) attempted to do some shady market manipulation to take down the HLP vault. I'm just worried that we might have a case of flying too close to the sun and getting burnt if not careful and in this case you're dealing with the biggest government in the world. E.g. idk court order against Coinbase to allow hyperliquid redemptions to from USDC to USD, but minting not allowed.
I agree it's Abit vague but I'm sure we recall that there were incidents where it appeared as if binance insiders (allegedly) attempted to do some shady market manipulation to take down the HLP vault. I'm just worried that we might have a case of flying too close to the sun and getting burnt if not careful and in this case you're dealing with the biggest government in the world. E.g. idk court order against Coinbase to allow hyperliquid redemptions to from USDC to USD, but minting not allowed.
Philosophical point but is anyone concerned about the institutions not liking hyperliquid taking a share of their revenue and therefore sabotaging hyperliquid? I imagine incumbent exchanges have incentives to destroy competitors
Philosophical point but is anyone concerned about the institutions not liking hyperliquid taking a share of their revenue and therefore sabotaging hyperliquid? I imagine incumbent exchanges have incentives to destroy competitors
Was the reason for patching it simply aesthetics then? And not that making -> IOC abused fee structure or queue priority?
Was the reason for patching it simply aesthetics then? And not that making -> IOC abused fee structure or queue priority?
Can someone explain the significance of not allowing current making limit orders to be modified to IOC? What was the difference between the above versus cancel + IOC?
Can someone explain the significance of not allowing current making limit orders to be modified to IOC? What was the difference between the above versus cancel + IOC?
Hello, can someone explain the significance of not allowing current making limit orders to be modified to IOC? What was the difference between the above versus cancel + IOC?
Hello, can someone explain the significance of not allowing current making limit orders to be modified to IOC? What was the difference between the above versus cancel + IOC?