PolymarketI’m not sure about being matchfixed but the volume is impressive compared to prizepool
I’m not sure about being matchfixed but the volume is impressive compared to prizepool
Tsunami参与话题 4消息总数 74
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 74 条，显示第 51-74 条Everything changed, my bad, you are right
Everything changed, my bad, you are right
oh true it was not just legacy
oh true it was not just legacy
Legacy out cuz visa
Legacy out cuz visa
Provider does have cod games for this week?
Provider does have cod games for this week?
50-50 would have suited me, but the past clarification made it clear about "intention to play" for maps. I've never seen anything equivalent in the Rounds market rules.
50-50 would have suited me, but the past clarification made it clear about "intention to play" for maps. I've never seen anything equivalent in the Rounds market rules.
These are two completely different rule sets and you're conflating them. The Over/Under rules explicitly state that forfeited maps count towards the total if the match is completed — that's a specific rule about maps, not rounds. My argument about "rounds played" vs "rounds attempted" has nothing to do with that. There is no equivalent clause in the Odd/Even Rounds rules that says forfeited rounds count. The rules say "rounds played" — full stop. You're using a clarification about map forfeits to attack an argument about round counts. They operate under completely different logic. I appreciate the pushback but this is the second time you've brought up an argument that ends up supporting my point. Happy to keep going if you'd like.
These are two completely different rule sets and you're conflating them. The Over/Under rules explicitly state that forfeited maps count towards the total if the match is completed — that's a specific rule about maps, not rounds. My argument about "rounds played" vs "rounds attempted" has nothing to do with that. There is no equivalent clause in the Odd/Even Rounds rules that says forfeited rounds count. The rules say "rounds played" — full stop. You're using a clarification about map forfeits to attack an argument about round counts. They operate under completely different logic. I appreciate the pushback but this is the second time you've brought up an argument that ends up supporting my point. Happy to keep going if you'd like.
Who said map 2 and map 3 was played?
Who said map 2 and map 3 was played?
That was before I saw the intention to play map 3
That was before I saw the intention to play map 3
You have experience trying it?
You have experience trying it?
Yes they could I do not have sources that they didn't, I just asked the french guy(VECTIZZ) that streams clutchain games and on live he said that, but that is not enough proof, btw, I just want consensus not to fuck your money.
Yes they could I do not have sources that they didn't, I just asked the french guy(VECTIZZ) that streams clutchain games and on live he said that, but that is not enough proof, btw, I just want consensus not to fuck your money.
Back then, Map 2 was forfeited by the Map 1 losers, meaning they forfeited the clinching map. In this case, however, they forfeited the entire series because they couldn't keep playing. This means Map 2 wasn't the clinching map, and Map 3 was never even on the table since the series was forfeited beforehand.
Back then, Map 2 was forfeited by the Map 1 losers, meaning they forfeited the clinching map. In this case, however, they forfeited the entire series because they couldn't keep playing. This means Map 2 wasn't the clinching map, and Map 3 was never even on the table since the series was forfeited beforehand.
I think in Cricket they have
I think in Cricket they have
Is it impossible to do Placeholders for these call of duty events? they're pretty big but there is no time window for pregame betting.
Is it impossible to do Placeholders for these call of duty events? they're pretty big but there is no time window for pregame betting.
<@238266984297529345> Hello I sent u a DM
<@238266984297529345> Hello I sent u a DM
Please https://polymarket.com/esports/call-of-duty/call-of-duty-league Games for tomorrow
Please https://polymarket.com/esports/call-of-duty/call-of-duty-league Games for tomorrow
what is going on here? https://polymarket.com/esports/rainbow-six-siege/cn-league/r6siege-allgam-myquee-2026-06-05 why is is this not closed?
what is going on here? https://polymarket.com/esports/rainbow-six-siege/cn-league/r6siege-allgam-myquee-2026-06-05 why is is this not closed?
There is no way to see Postions Closed with negative PNL anymore?
There is no way to see Postions Closed with negative PNL anymore?
Thanks
Thanks
True, didn't see you already talked about it in that channel.
True, didn't see you already talked about it in that channel.
that is resolved but it is stucked i think <@886468844460339232> please could you take a look
that is resolved but it is stucked i think <@886468844460339232> please could you take a look
It is ok I didn't lose money in it but I was interested in betting on it. Maybe next time, thanks tho for insisting in superiors.
It is ok I didn't lose money in it but I was interested in betting on it. Maybe next time, thanks tho for insisting in superiors.
There were like 5 people asking for this to be updated for months before it reach the date
There were like 5 people asking for this to be updated for months before it reach the date
what happened with this? https://polymarket.com/es/event/lol-lrs-2026-split-1-winner you updated it out of time? everything got resolved no even with the rules updated :/
what happened with this? https://polymarket.com/es/event/lol-lrs-2026-split-1-winner you updated it out of time? everything got resolved no even with the rules updated :/
← 上一页
第 2 / 2 页