2026-06-09 · Polymarket · 13 条相关讨论
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/esea/cs2-xi-clutch-2026-06-08 Clutchain forfeit after Map 1 - Map 2 50/50, Total Over 2.5 100/0, XI +1.5 100/0
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/esea/cs2-xi-clutch-2026-06-08 Clutchain forfeit after Map 1 - Map 2 50/50, Total Over 2.5 100/0, XI +1.5 100/0
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/esea/cs2-xi-clutch-2026-06-08
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/esea/cs2-xi-clutch-2026-06-08
Should resolve to over 2.5
Should resolve to over 2.5
<@639555686208110612> Is this not the same situation as M1X vs dripmen that we have dealt with just a month before. I think this should resolve Over 2.5, XI +1.5. Clutchain had technical issues for one of the players - they forfeited Map 2 first and after that Map 3 as they failed to connect on Map 3 also.
<@639555686208110612> Is this not the same situation as M1X vs dripmen that we have dealt with just a month before. I think this should resolve Over 2.5, XI +1.5. Clutchain had technical issues for one of the players - they forfeited Map 2 first and after that Map 3 as they failed to connect on Map 3 also.
Back then, Map 2 was forfeited by the Map 1 losers, meaning they forfeited the clinching map. In this case, however, they forfeited the entire series because they couldn't keep playing. This means Map 2 wasn't the clinching map, and Map 3 was never even on the table since the series was forfeited beforehand.
Back then, Map 2 was forfeited by the Map 1 losers, meaning they forfeited the clinching map. In this case, however, they forfeited the entire series because they couldn't keep playing. This means Map 2 wasn't the clinching map, and Map 3 was never even on the table since the series was forfeited beforehand.
Therefore Map 3 is clinching map as Map 2 was forfeited individually
Therefore Map 3 is clinching map as Map 2 was forfeited individually
If they really decided to forfeit after Map 1, yes, then it makes sense at 50/50. But in reality, they tried to get as much time as possible to play the rest of the match, especially after winning the 1st map - so they forfeited Map 2 and then still had time to play Map 3.
If they really decided to forfeit after Map 1, yes, then it makes sense at 50/50. But in reality, they tried to get as much time as possible to play the rest of the match, especially after winning the 1st map - so they forfeited Map 2 and then still had time to play Map 3.
clutchain forfeited map 2 individually, had time to connect to map 3, tried but failed to do so = map 3 is the clinching map as the match could have continued on the 3rd map if they readied up as 5 and as per rules, if the clinching map is forfeited, the match counts as completed
clutchain forfeited map 2 individually, had time to connect to map 3, tried but failed to do so = map 3 is the clinching map as the match could have continued on the 3rd map if they readied up as 5 and as per rules, if the clinching map is forfeited, the match counts as completed
"Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the total, provided that the match is completed." this is written in the rules
"Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the total, provided that the match is completed." this is written in the rules
"If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's match forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to 50-50" this is written in the rules too
"If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's match forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to 50-50" this is written in the rules too
depends on how u look at FF i can say that they had tech difficulties and FF map 2 and map 3. So they didnt FF clincing map they FF the match => so 50-50 u can say that they FF map 2 => score = 1-1 and then FF map 3 => map 3 was clincing map so Over.
depends on how u look at FF i can say that they had tech difficulties and FF map 2 and map 3. So they didnt FF clincing map they FF the match => so 50-50 u can say that they FF map 2 => score = 1-1 and then FF map 3 => map 3 was clincing map so Over.
we were supposed toget these rules, that make it clear that this should be 50-50, but for some reason we are still stuck with the ambiguous ones
we were supposed toget these rules, that make it clear that this should be 50-50, but for some reason we are still stuck with the ambiguous ones
bm ob XI Esport vs Clutchain o/u 2.5
bm ob XI Esport vs Clutchain o/u 2.5