near or maybe a little above 10 cents at least imo
near or maybe a little above 10 cents at least imo
该用户的聊天记录定位。
near or maybe a little above 10 cents at least imo
near or maybe a little above 10 cents at least imo
If it was open I think this would push it a decent bit
If it was open I think this would push it a decent bit
this has more fv for sure
this has more fv for sure
good question
good question
"would the people who bonded 80k on no be pissed if it went yes"
"would the people who bonded 80k on no be pissed if it went yes"
spirit should be Y off the other X hit anyway though
spirit should be Y off the other X hit anyway though
good point
good point
hard to say
hard to say
but it's short
but it's short
context makes it clearly ex-
context makes it clearly ex-
🤷♂️ we've had other cases like this count, but this being a shorter word makes it harder
🤷♂️ we've had other cases like this count, but this being a shorter word makes it harder
thank ideas
thank ideas
it's definitely an eks sound
it's definitely an eks sound
if you slow it down the hard k sound at the start of the x is even clearer
if you slow it down the hard k sound at the start of the x is even clearer
there's no c, no l, etc
there's no c, no l, etc
but it is clearly e followed by x and nothing else
but it is clearly e followed by x and nothing else
not saying it 100% counts
not saying it 100% counts
ngmi on audio cucks
ngmi on audio cucks
if you hear anything but e x there
if you hear anything but e x there
you're on drugs
you're on drugs
it's definitely an x
it's definitely an x
I think you'd do fine willy
I think you'd do fine willy
just a clear Y!
just a clear Y!
so it wraps back to jake res
so it wraps back to jake res
although the new audio clip means it's not an unclear market anymore
although the new audio clip means it's not an unclear market anymore
and kalshi employees legally can't lie
and kalshi employees legally can't lie
jake (a kalshi employee) posted this earlier
jake (a kalshi employee) posted this earlier
was I lied to?
was I lied to?
...?
...?
so lucky!!
so lucky!!
and now you can just res it Y off that with no drama!
and now you can just res it Y off that with no drama!
I know you guys all had your hearts moved by my awesome argument for ex Y
I know you guys all had your hearts moved by my awesome argument for ex Y
willy
willy
No Good / Missed was an evil NFL strike btw
No Good / Missed was an evil NFL strike btw
in ankle he was just saying nonsense that had nothing to do with ankles
in ankle he was just saying nonsense that had nothing to do with ankles
shortening*
shortening*
this one is clearly him going to say exclusive and shorterning
this one is clearly him going to say exclusive and shorterning
ankle didn't have context tho, this does
ankle didn't have context tho, this does
but the actual utterance is clearly ex-
but the actual utterance is clearly ex-
he goes to say exclusive and then cuts it off and rewords it
he goes to say exclusive and then cuts it off and rewords it
it's pretty clearly ex
it's pretty clearly ex
but it's kind of a stutter?
but it's kind of a stutter?
pretty clear ex utterance
pretty clear ex utterance
https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/1408942496045863042/1526093001699627058
https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/1408942496045863042/1526093001699627058
it's a little bit above if you're curious
it's a little bit above if you're curious
some guy in ideas found it
some guy in ideas found it
new clip came out of them saying ex elsewhere lmao
new clip came out of them saying ex elsewhere lmao
My headcanon is that I moved jake with my awesome ex Y argument and he's happy that he now has a "clean" Y res!
My headcanon is that I moved jake with my awesome ex Y argument and he's happy that he now has a "clean" Y res!
whether it counts is another story
whether it counts is another story
yeah I think we all agree the actual utterance is clearly ex
yeah I think we all agree the actual utterance is clearly ex