Kalshiwe have lots of precedent for these types of situations counting
we have lots of precedent for these types of situations counting
Mitchieboi参与话题 45消息总数 4379
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 4379 条，显示第 301-350 条I will be bidding Y
I will be bidding Y
I think he will
I think he will
93% of the way through world cup lol
93% of the way through world cup lol
consider how many people in ideas have apparently sworn off mentions
consider how many people in ideas have apparently sworn off mentions
better for long term health of mentions
better for long term health of mentions
i like it
i like it
to add rules analysts and sideline?
to add rules analysts and sideline?
buy N
buy N
but it'll go Y
but it'll go Y
still have to ignore SAs
still have to ignore SAs
because cpac feels good
because cpac feels good
literally just vibing at that point
literally just vibing at that point
if you argue the <source> = mark carney point to justify overruling that, then why wouldn't a random facebook stream work
if you argue the <source> = mark carney point to justify overruling that, then why wouldn't a random facebook stream work
but not an SA in the rules
but not an SA in the rules
the only difference with CPAC is it's "official"
the only difference with CPAC is it's "official"
like if you don't count a facebook stream
like if you don't count a facebook stream
I wish we had a strike that hit in first part and not second but oh well
I wish we had a strike that hit in first part and not second but oh well
for me it's just the SA thing
for me it's just the SA thing
lol
lol
I'm sure it's just a mixup
I'm sure it's just a mixup
and to scemer i apply hanlon's razor
and to scemer i apply hanlon's razor
Lawrence wouldn't lie
Lawrence wouldn't lie
even if recording came up after?
even if recording came up after?
if it was a random facebook stream, we all agree it would not count
if it was a random facebook stream, we all agree it would not count
so now the question again is do SAs matter
so now the question again is do SAs matter
so I can corroborate
so I can corroborate
I saw you on the OB too
I saw you on the OB too
but it's impossible for you to have done that without it being livestreamed
but it's impossible for you to have done that without it being livestreamed
I never didn't believe you for the record
I never didn't believe you for the record
I believe you
I believe you
yeah
yeah
off the livestream?
off the livestream?
1:34 AM EST - Does 2 minutes <walks to other room> <possible dead time> <19 minutes of talking> <possible dead time> 2:16 AM EST - Video uploaded
1:34 AM EST - Does 2 minutes <walks to other room> <possible dead time> <19 minutes of talking> <possible dead time> 2:16 AM EST - Video uploaded
can't speak to cpac
can't speak to cpac
on youtube
on youtube
2:16 AM ET
2:16 AM ET
not on cpac schedule either
not on cpac schedule either
hmm
hmm
I would argue it should be, but maybe it would vibe off it lol
I would argue it should be, but maybe it would vibe off it lol
it was a separate welcome, then a media availability
it was a separate welcome, then a media availability
it'd be like counting trump greeting at car for a bilat
it'd be like counting trump greeting at car for a bilat
two separate events on calendar
two separate events on calendar
pretty clear to me that the 2 mins doesn't count and the second one does
pretty clear to me that the 2 mins doesn't count and the second one does
can kalshi resolve off a video if there was no evidence that it was streamed
can kalshi resolve off a video if there was no evidence that it was streamed
so now the question
so now the question
did you check cpac for a livestream?
did you check cpac for a livestream?
for livestream? or what
for livestream? or what
do you think it should count
do you think it should count
<@445032403493322762> if there was no stream
<@445032403493322762> if there was no stream