聊天记录
共 6 条，显示第 1-6 条
Same issue with https://polymarket.com/event/wti-up-or-down-on-july-6-2026 oil. the previous trading session of July 3rd and closing price was 68.77$. You display previous close as July 2nd. Though according to rules clearly holidays and shortened sessions should count. Please, fix. <@941405798096076880>
Same issue with https://polymarket.com/event/wti-up-or-down-on-july-6-2026 oil. the previous trading session of July 3rd and closing price was 68.77$. You display previous close as July 2nd. Though according to rules clearly holidays and shortened sessions should count. Please, fix. <@941405798096076880>
Please remove this account 0x3e8379fa4e49648d88dc6c885abd776adbdc2132 from proposers whitelist. Tried to quietly propose a market without a reason to manipulate other more active markets.
Please remove this account 0x3e8379fa4e49648d88dc6c885abd776adbdc2132 from proposers whitelist. Tried to quietly propose a market without a reason to manipulate other more active markets.
does anyone know, if rewards are included in PnL chart for user profiles?
does anyone know, if rewards are included in PnL chart for user profiles?
Staff, there needs to be issued a clarification for all markets that involve FrontierMath Benchmark. There are plenty of them. This benchmark was changed and scores are completely different in the new version. It is impossible to judge based on the written rules how to resolve the markets. please, evaluate the situation yourself and issue a clarification.
Staff, there needs to be issued a clarification for all markets that involve FrontierMath Benchmark. There are plenty of them. This benchmark was changed and scores are completely different in the new version. It is impossible to judge based on the written rules how to resolve the markets. please, evaluate the situation yourself and issue a clarification.
Also there is a need for P5 option - "cancel market" and return everyone their invested stake. In some circumstances it is really impossible to fairly choose YES, No based on written rules, and 50/50 is also unfair.
Also there is a need for P5 option - "cancel market" and return everyone their invested stake. In some circumstances it is really impossible to fairly choose YES, No based on written rules, and 50/50 is also unfair.
hey there. After 5 months of using this platform I want to suggest this: transition to fully AI based resolution of markets from UMA voting, which is corrupt and often leads to unfair outcomes. Collaborate with one of top AI companies to write and customize an LLM agent for that. People though can provide their arguments and links for its context, but it should check all links and news (and their credibility) before making a decision. I think these models reached a state when it is already better than UMA's voting.
hey there. After 5 months of using this platform I want to suggest this: transition to fully AI based resolution of markets from UMA voting, which is corrupt and often leads to unfair outcomes. Collaborate with one of top AI companies to write and customize an LLM agent for that. People though can provide their arguments and links for its context, but it should check all links and news (and their credibility) before making a decision. I think these models reached a state when it is already better than UMA's voting.
Polymarket