PolymarketWe will have some scams in the wc final trust
We will have some scams in the wc final trust
cenas参与话题 5消息总数 199
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 199 条，显示第 1-50 条And it will be even harder to move such things to criminal conduct, something like this is usually a civil matter afaik
And it will be even harder to move such things to criminal conduct, something like this is usually a civil matter afaik
They do sometimes (and should absolutely stop) redefine markets or resolve balantly against rules, but trump-xi wasn't such case
They do sometimes (and should absolutely stop) redefine markets or resolve balantly against rules, but trump-xi wasn't such case
If this is based on the china mentions I think you'll hurt your case
If this is based on the china mentions I think you'll hurt your case
What is your lawsuit accusing pm of specifically?
What is your lawsuit accusing pm of specifically?
He meant spam rule lmao
He meant spam rule lmao
You are an idiot for stating facts obv
You are an idiot for stating facts obv
Need some markets about US seizing ships
Need some markets about US seizing ships
Are you trying to get him banned? What's your problem?
Are you trying to get him banned? What's your problem?
Honestly I'm just sorry for peeps who are raised in those places
Honestly I'm just sorry for peeps who are raised in those places
Technically f all middle eastern power structures, just anti-freedom anti-nature and anti-human bs
Technically f all middle eastern power structures, just anti-freedom anti-nature and anti-human bs
There is more, I take it you are talking about clause 12 but 13 right after has immediate effects for ex. The whole agreement ins underlied by clause 1 tho, you can't bind yourself to a state that you don't recognized legitimacy of
There is more, I take it you are talking about clause 12 but 13 right after has immediate effects for ex. The whole agreement ins underlied by clause 1 tho, you can't bind yourself to a state that you don't recognized legitimacy of
Whether that's overreach or not by their executive branch, they'll have to sort that out later
Whether that's overreach or not by their executive branch, they'll have to sort that out later
It's like everyone is missing the fact that Israel is **explicitly** treated as a legitimate state entity with the right to exist, effectively for the first time by the Lebanese gov, contrary to prev agreements in which they were treated as an illegal occupier
It's like everyone is missing the fact that Israel is **explicitly** treated as a legitimate state entity with the right to exist, effectively for the first time by the Lebanese gov, contrary to prev agreements in which they were treated as an illegal occupier
This is generally true for agreements in which the UN participates like climate agreements but not generally true for ceasefires for example. Read article 12 of the vclt and you'll see that some agreements are effective upon signature. You can have cases in which some clauses are effective upon signing and others aren't. This agreement has a series of clauses effective upon signing
This is generally true for agreements in which the UN participates like climate agreements but not generally true for ceasefires for example. Read article 12 of the vclt and you'll see that some agreements are effective upon signature. You can have cases in which some clauses are effective upon signing and others aren't. This agreement has a series of clauses effective upon signing
So upside down text doesn't count? Aren't we just making up rules now?
So upside down text doesn't count? Aren't we just making up rules now?
Nah this has extraneous characters tho you are prob being ironic
Nah this has extraneous characters tho you are prob being ironic
𝐀𝐒 ˡᗝη𝔾 Ãร Ｙ𝕠𝕦 υ𝔰𝑒 Δ Ƒ𝓸ᑎＴ т𝐡ᗩ𝓣 υ𝕤έＳ 𝐀ˡ卩ℍÃ𝓃𝓾ᗰẸＲⒾ¢𝔸𝕃 ｃ𝐇Ⓐ尺Ⓐ𝕔𝕋ⓔŘ𝐬 𝓅яẸＳ乇ｎт ｉ𝓷 Ｔħᵉ Ⓔ𝓃Ğ𝓁丨𝕊ħ ⓐℓＰＨค𝐛έт
𝐀𝐒 ˡᗝη𝔾 Ãร Ｙ𝕠𝕦 υ𝔰𝑒 Δ Ƒ𝓸ᑎＴ т𝐡ᗩ𝓣 υ𝕤έＳ 𝐀ˡ卩ℍÃ𝓃𝓾ᗰẸＲⒾ¢𝔸𝕃 ｃ𝐇Ⓐ尺Ⓐ𝕔𝕋ⓔŘ𝐬 𝓅яẸＳ乇ｎт ｉ𝓷 Ｔħᵉ Ⓔ𝓃Ğ𝓁丨𝕊ħ ⓐℓＰＨค𝐛έт
In fact I did not remember this logo just a while ago
In fact I did not remember this logo just a while ago
I don't need to have seen the logo before
I don't need to have seen the logo before
But like what extra info do I need?
But like what extra info do I need?
What external info do you need?
What external info do you need?
Bro miga wasn't clear cuz it was very small and blurry
Bro miga wasn't clear cuz it was very small and blurry
Idk why we would care about relative pixel or image positions tho
Idk why we would care about relative pixel or image positions tho
Tho you mean relative positions, ik
Tho you mean relative positions, ik
The extraneous symbol clause also doesn't apply cuz it's just a font change
The extraneous symbol clause also doesn't apply cuz it's just a font change
Yep, just as it would if you slightly moved the letters to the left lol
Yep, just as it would if you slightly moved the letters to the left lol
It's rotated 180 degrees, nothing special
It's rotated 180 degrees, nothing special
And the F in this case it's just how they write F in that logo
And the F in this case it's just how they write F in that logo
Only one that is weird is the F, the others are obv a u and c upside down
Only one that is weird is the F, the others are obv a u and c upside down
How is this one not readable?
How is this one not readable?
Thankfully we are not faulty ocr software
Thankfully we are not faulty ocr software
This is clearly )__L__n
This is clearly )__L__n
Bring back the "New markets" section pls
Bring back the "New markets" section pls
I am not so sure
I am not so sure
Does he mean downblend or enrich less? I'd say downblend but enrich less is some garbage usage of language
Does he mean downblend or enrich less? I'd say downblend but enrich less is some garbage usage of language
Everyone placing their hopes and dreams on Andy just for him to end up not fixing anything lol
Everyone placing their hopes and dreams on Andy just for him to end up not fixing anything lol
People prob missed the possibility
People prob missed the possibility
Ah ok
Ah ok
Because it can't resolve on announcement anymore
Because it can't resolve on announcement anymore
Compared to prv markets like this one
Compared to prv markets like this one
They changed the rules
They changed the rules
Only the left or only the right one?
Only the left or only the right one?
Both Tulsi and Vance say Iran is not enriching, that's the expectation in the mou
Both Tulsi and Vance say Iran is not enriching, that's the expectation in the mou
Vance said they have, very clearly
Vance said they have, very clearly
They have said that they are not
They have said that they are not
The program is halted, that's the official stance on both sides. 100% them restarting enriching breaks the status quo
The program is halted, that's the official stance on both sides. 100% them restarting enriching breaks the status quo
So if they restart their nuclear program they can argue they keep the status quo? That makes 0 sense
So if they restart their nuclear program they can argue they keep the status quo? That makes 0 sense
Do they have the same rules?
Do they have the same rules?
Bro that can never be the oficial status quo, don't overthonk at that level
Bro that can never be the oficial status quo, don't overthonk at that level
第 1 / 4 页
下一页 →