秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

∞://XRP参与话题 0消息总数 15

该用户的聊天记录定位。

Reset

聊天记录

共 15 条,显示第 1-15 条
∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:38:02 Polymarket

https://arkm.com/explorer/tx/423619faa841d17ec0bf813b21b9650a7a35b0ea4d36407b077df0e264b18040

https://arkm.com/explorer/tx/423619faa841d17ec0bf813b21b9650a7a35b0ea4d36407b077df0e264b18040

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:28:52 Polymarket

typical Uma mafia tards buying million on 99.9 c to scam everyone thats how they roll all the time

typical Uma mafia tards buying million on 99.9 c to scam everyone thats how they roll all the time

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:23:12 Polymarket

but no onchain data by Poly🤣

but no onchain data by Poly🤣

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:15:49 Polymarket

no it wasnt cause its now in clarif

no it wasnt cause its now in clarif

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:15:33 Polymarket

you are really dumb, btc can be sold even on last minute of 31 of May and poly mafia clarif scam was made after fillings so

you are really dumb, btc can be sold even on last minute of 31 of May and poly mafia clarif scam was made after fillings so

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:14:55 Polymarket

clarif about dedline was later than fillings you bot)

clarif about dedline was later than fillings you bot)

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:11:34 Polymarket

can uma bots answer why clarif was made after SEX filling proof? to scam for mafia haha as always

can uma bots answer why clarif was made after SEX filling proof? to scam for mafia haha as always

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:10:51 Polymarket

MAFIA)

MAFIA)

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:10:26 Polymarket

May 5th: Polymarket opens a "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31st 11:59pm" market that closes on June 1st at 11:59pm May 31st: MicroStrategy sells Bitcoin at 4pm June 1st: At 8am, Microstrategy publishes their 8-K, officially confirming they sold Bitcoin. The market on Polymarket is still open, and shoots up to ~90% YES. June 1st: Around noon, a Polymarket employee retroactively changes the rules to include "Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify" while $UMA whales start buying lots of "NO" shares. UMA is the protocol responsible for resolving this market. The market nukes to pretty much 0.

May 5th: Polymarket opens a "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31st 11:59pm" market that closes on June 1st at 11:59pm May 31st: MicroStrategy sells Bitcoin at 4pm June 1st: At 8am, Microstrategy publishes their 8-K, officially confirming they sold Bitcoin. The market on Polymarket is still open, and shoots up to ~90% YES. June 1st: Around noon, a Polymarket employee retroactively changes the rules to include "Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify" while $UMA whales start buying lots of "NO" shares. UMA is the protocol responsible for resolving this market. The market nukes to pretty much 0.

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:01:11 Polymarket

sooner or later they will be sued oh yeah

sooner or later they will be sued oh yeah

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:00:58 Polymarket

lagging scamming trash

lagging scamming trash

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 03:00:51 Polymarket

pm website is a trash like their rules and UMA)

pm website is a trash like their rules and UMA)

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 02:56:40 Polymarket

mafia scammers prepare for it

mafia scammers prepare for it

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 02:56:15 Polymarket

docs . polymarket. com / concepts/ resolution → "Clarifications": an "Additional context" update "cannot change the fundamental intent of the question." That's THEIR rule, not mine. The question asked if MSTR SOLD Bitcoin by May 31 — an event. Their last-minute "additional context" quietly rewrote it into whether the sale was ANNOUNCED by May 31. That's not a clarification, that's moving the goalposts after the ball's in the net — and their own 8-K already confirms the sale landed May 26–31, inside the window. So they took a market their own primary source says is YES, and stapled on a brand-new disclosure condition after the deadline to drag it to No. Textbook breach of their own clarification rule. Sale happened in the window. Resolve it YES — or admit the rulebook is just decoration.

docs . polymarket. com / concepts/ resolution → "Clarifications": an "Additional context" update "cannot change the fundamental intent of the question." That's THEIR rule, not mine. The question asked if MSTR SOLD Bitcoin by May 31 — an event. Their last-minute "additional context" quietly rewrote it into whether the sale was ANNOUNCED by May 31. That's not a clarification, that's moving the goalposts after the ball's in the net — and their own 8-K already confirms the sale landed May 26–31, inside the window. So they took a market their own primary source says is YES, and stapled on a brand-new disclosure condition after the deadline to drag it to No. Textbook breach of their own clarification rule. Sale happened in the window. Resolve it YES — or admit the rulebook is just decoration.

∞://XRP 2026-06-04 02:28:29 Polymarket

what a trash

what a trash