Polymarketsaid bec u said they should refund only ones b4 clarification
said bec u said they should refund only ones b4 clarification
Paarth参与话题 2消息总数 212
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 212 条，显示第 51-100 条<@886468844460339232> you said that the end date was wrong and for another market under the same thing, that too should have been clarified then right? It never said that the markets timeframe has been changed and that the end date mentioned is wrong, in the clarification "End date is when the market is suitable for resolution" according to polymarket. It resolved early without any credible information from any source
<@886468844460339232> you said that the end date was wrong and for another market under the same thing, that too should have been clarified then right? It never said that the markets timeframe has been changed and that the end date mentioned is wrong, in the clarification "End date is when the market is suitable for resolution" according to polymarket. It resolved early without any credible information from any source
<@755518755202662451> Polys docs clearly state that the end date is the date when the market is fit for resolution Why did it happen early?
<@755518755202662451> Polys docs clearly state that the end date is the date when the market is fit for resolution Why did it happen early?
clarification said announced within the timeframe Timeframe was 5th may to 1st July or Jan... It was announced in the markets timeframe...
clarification said announced within the timeframe Timeframe was 5th may to 1st July or Jan... It was announced in the markets timeframe...
thoughts??
thoughts??
<@1504536206384435333> ?
<@1504536206384435333> ?
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With $400 million in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With $400 million in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
but the clarif did not follow polys own docs/rules and according to poly the market timeframe is till 1st july so why did it resolve so early?
but the clarif did not follow polys own docs/rules and according to poly the market timeframe is till 1st july so why did it resolve so early?
not ppl post clarif who thought poly would do the right thing by resolving it as a yes?
not ppl post clarif who thought poly would do the right thing by resolving it as a yes?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-26/crypto-whales-dominate-polymarket-disputes-worth-5-billion
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-26/crypto-whales-dominate-polymarket-disputes-worth-5-billion
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With **$400 million** in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With **$400 million** in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
but not with some, this one had extremely high volume, maybe poly themselves bet money on it, with their bobe account(?), to get more ppl to buy yes bec their research said micro strategy wont buy...?
but not with some, this one had extremely high volume, maybe poly themselves bet money on it, with their bobe account(?), to get more ppl to buy yes bec their research said micro strategy wont buy...?
doesnt matter, most of them is just whales who use polymarket, or maybe poly themselves...? who resolve markets in their favour sometimes whenever they wanna pay less...? 👀 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-26/crypto-whales-dominate-polymarket-disputes-worth-5-billion
doesnt matter, most of them is just whales who use polymarket, or maybe poly themselves...? who resolve markets in their favour sometimes whenever they wanna pay less...? 👀 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-26/crypto-whales-dominate-polymarket-disputes-worth-5-billion
More scams by poly Not surprising
More scams by poly Not surprising
refund from the scam?
refund from the scam?
wv?
wv?
https://docs.polymarket.com/concepts/resolution#resolution-rules Resolution source — Where the outcome will be determined from (e.g., official announcements, specific websites) End date — When the market is eligible for resolution No source was used. Did not resolve the market based on the written end date... Now if it was an "ERROR" on their side that they mentioned the wrong end date, then why do i have to bear the losses??
https://docs.polymarket.com/concepts/resolution#resolution-rules Resolution source — Where the outcome will be determined from (e.g., official announcements, specific websites) End date — When the market is eligible for resolution No source was used. Did not resolve the market based on the written end date... Now if it was an "ERROR" on their side that they mentioned the wrong end date, then why do i have to bear the losses??
Where does it say that the end date mentioned is an estimate Where does it say that the market will resolve to no by defualt if there is no information of there being a sale or not being any Where does it say that the market will be resolved instantly at 12 am et on 1st june? It never said it will resolve instantly when the event time is supposed to end How tf do u not wait till the time u specified for knowing if it happened or not...?
Where does it say that the end date mentioned is an estimate Where does it say that the market will resolve to no by defualt if there is no information of there being a sale or not being any Where does it say that the market will be resolved instantly at 12 am et on 1st june? It never said it will resolve instantly when the event time is supposed to end How tf do u not wait till the time u specified for knowing if it happened or not...?
the july 1 end date shows up after u specifically click on 31st may and see its rules...
the july 1 end date shows up after u specifically click on 31st may and see its rules...
polys docs say that clarification cannot change the intent of the market It did change from "**when will they sell**" to "**when will they announce the sale if they sell**"
polys docs say that clarification cannot change the intent of the market It did change from "**when will they sell**" to "**when will they announce the sale if they sell**"
post the clarification that doesnt stand according to their own docs?
post the clarification that doesnt stand according to their own docs?
so it is my fault that they showed the wrong end date? Where in the rules is it mentioned that the market would resolve on 31st May?
so it is my fault that they showed the wrong end date? Where in the rules is it mentioned that the market would resolve on 31st May?
end date was 1st july or jan How can the market resolve to no on 1st june without any credible information saying it was not sold...? How dificult is it for u to understand?
end date was 1st july or jan How can the market resolve to no on 1st june without any credible information saying it was not sold...? How dificult is it for u to understand?
1. was 250% when it was 4 am or something so i did not know 2. I believed poly would do the right thing, not follow the wrong consensus which was made before the end date without any credible info 3. I also thought they would follow their docs which state additional clarification cannot change theintent of the market
1. was 250% when it was 4 am or something so i did not know 2. I believed poly would do the right thing, not follow the wrong consensus which was made before the end date without any credible info 3. I also thought they would follow their docs which state additional clarification cannot change theintent of the market
??
??
go to ur profile, might show on desktop only
go to ur profile, might show on desktop only
the clarification that changed the intent of the market...?
the clarification that changed the intent of the market...?
they wont resolve the ppl who believed poly would resolve it right...?
they wont resolve the ppl who believed poly would resolve it right...?
consesnsus passed before market end date without any clarification...?
consesnsus passed before market end date without any clarification...?
Howmuch of a scam is polymarket?
Howmuch of a scam is polymarket?
bm is polymarket a scam
bm is polymarket a scam
bm volume
bm volume
bm level
bm level
bm help
bm help
bm commands
bm commands
<@1361217824776786031>
<@1361217824776786031>
same
same
Refund YES from microstrategy!!
Refund YES from microstrategy!!
no official statement on the scam yet right...?
no official statement on the scam yet right...?
more ways to scam
more ways to scam
Already did
Already did
I did, his DMs r just for ppl with a blue check😭
I did, his DMs r just for ppl with a blue check😭
I dont get how ppl keep ignoring this: https://x.com/i/status/2062865665598329207
I dont get how ppl keep ignoring this: https://x.com/i/status/2062865665598329207
I dont think the airdrop is anytime soon, Bec they wouldn't want to ruin the price at launch, which will happen bec of the bad pr from the scam they did in the microstrategy market, they would've paid out the yes owners something to stay away from the bad pr and to keep all happy Maybe they delayed it bec of the -ve stuff going on around polymarket
I dont think the airdrop is anytime soon, Bec they wouldn't want to ruin the price at launch, which will happen bec of the bad pr from the scam they did in the microstrategy market, they would've paid out the yes owners something to stay away from the bad pr and to keep all happy Maybe they delayed it bec of the -ve stuff going on around polymarket
Whats a maker and taker rebate?
Whats a maker and taker rebate?
Still no official statement on the scam...
Still no official statement on the scam...
he is the mod
he is the mod
30%?
30%?
welcome to the platform which can change rules, resolve anytime for no reason and has visual glitches all along
welcome to the platform which can change rules, resolve anytime for no reason and has visual glitches all along
U sure there were 200 million yes shares?
U sure there were 200 million yes shares?