2026-06-06 · Polymarket · 10 条相关讨论
If i was one of the whales who lost big cuz of a motherfucker who changed the rules last minute i would genuinely hire a hitman on the dark web, quite cheap 5-10k pounds
If i was one of the whales who lost big cuz of a motherfucker who changed the rules last minute i would genuinely hire a hitman on the dark web, quite cheap 5-10k pounds
The timing of the clarification is wrong ffs
The timing of the clarification is wrong ffs
tbf, this shitshow wouldn't happen if ponymarket closed the market 31 may.
tbf, this shitshow wouldn't happen if ponymarket closed the market 31 may.
still, deserved
still, deserved
Refund YES from microstrategy!!
Refund YES from microstrategy!!
1. was 250% when it was 4 am or something so i did not know 2. I believed poly would do the right thing, not follow the wrong consensus which was made before the end date without any credible info 3. I also thought they would follow their docs which state additional clarification cannot change theintent of the market
1. was 250% when it was 4 am or something so i did not know 2. I believed poly would do the right thing, not follow the wrong consensus which was made before the end date without any credible info 3. I also thought they would follow their docs which state additional clarification cannot change theintent of the market
Sane persons (like i like to consider myself) dont want 100k for 400$ ,they just want the right thing TO BE REFUNDED for a lack of clear rules
Sane persons (like i like to consider myself) dont want 100k for 400$ ,they just want the right thing TO BE REFUNDED for a lack of clear rules
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With **$400 million** in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With **$400 million** in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With $400 million in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
What if Polymarket secretly operates the UMA whale wallets controlling their dispute resolutions? Bloomberg data reveals just 9 anonymous wallets hold roughly half the voting power over the last three years. Even with 6,400+ accounts participating, this tiny, opaque cartel has absolute power over billions in contracts. Operating in the dark means zero proof the platform itself isn't a hidden whale, overriding consensus to dodge massive payouts. The MicroStrategy market is the perfect case study. With $400 million in volume, it asked if MSTR would sell Bitcoin by May 31. MSTR did sell 32 BTC, but because the disclosure dropped June 1, it's being pushed to resolve "No" on a technicality. During the trading window, the anonymous "bobe" account dumped $15 million onto "No." This heavy volume artificially inflated "Yes" odds, creating a trap to suck in massive retail liquidity. The math is predatory if insiders control these UMA wallets. They drop $15 million on "No" to pump "Yes" odds, lure retail in, and then force a "No" resolution using their unquestioned voting power. They reclaim their $15M stake and sweep all the retail capital, letting the house operate as a risk-free whale.
that guy who lost 500k on the microstrategy market is coping so hard on X
that guy who lost 500k on the microstrategy market is coping so hard on X