Polymarketat least someone is eating good
at least someone is eating good
ImVidde参与话题 1消息总数 52
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 52 条，显示第 1-50 条being correct is irrelevant
being correct is irrelevant
and set up a 750 dollar bond
and set up a 750 dollar bond
I guess if u are not verified
I guess if u are not verified
when it didnt
when it didnt
that the match ended 2-1
that the match ended 2-1
The resolver "additonal context" is based on assumptions
The resolver "additonal context" is based on assumptions
that is the whole problem.
that is the whole problem.
abndoned*
abndoned*
the match
the match
FIFA.com itnerrupted
FIFA.com itnerrupted
from their website
from their website
removed the match
removed the match
The "resoulution source" literally
The "resoulution source" literally
There is no official record
There is no official record
XD
XD
is wrong
is wrong
isthat the additonal context
isthat the additonal context
the whole problem
the whole problem
ye
ye
what
what
but it didnt
but it didnt
should resolve 50-50
should resolve 50-50
read the rules
read the rules
but someone just resolved it as 2-1
but someone just resolved it as 2-1
as it says in the rules
as it says in the rules
interrupted
interrupted
Since the match was abandoned
Since the match was abandoned
I mean the correct result would be 0-0
I mean the correct result would be 0-0
3,5 what
3,5 what
interesting system, didnt know
interesting system, didnt know
Does the resolver win?
Does the resolver win?
is it over+
is it over+
and no one disputed it
and no one disputed it
from the resolver
from the resolver
if the denmark market got resolved wrongfully
if the denmark market got resolved wrongfully
Just imagine how funny it would be if fifa themselves gave denmark the win when leading 2-1 at the 65th minute, when the match got stopped.
Just imagine how funny it would be if fifa themselves gave denmark the win when leading 2-1 at the 65th minute, when the match got stopped.
Im on your side here bro. The "Resolution source" doesnt say denmark won either. Its basically just the resolver that decided that a 2-1 lead when the match was interrupted is a win for denmark. It says pretty clearly in the rules "This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time." And somehow they resolved it as denmark win.
Im on your side here bro. The "Resolution source" doesnt say denmark won either. Its basically just the resolver that decided that a 2-1 lead when the match was interrupted is a win for denmark. It says pretty clearly in the rules "This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time." And somehow they resolved it as denmark win.
Hmm, lesson learned I guess. Didn’t know mistakes like this could happen
Hmm, lesson learned I guess. Didn’t know mistakes like this could happen
<@148887013645352960> so to dispute a mistake from a ”consensus of credible reporting” resolver. I would have to put up 750$?
<@148887013645352960> so to dispute a mistake from a ”consensus of credible reporting” resolver. I would have to put up 750$?
why "dont dispute it" I was looking into it and the resolver resolve and clarification violates its own rules.
why "dont dispute it" I was looking into it and the resolver resolve and clarification violates its own rules.
but if a market is "clarified" is it final? Because that is exactly what I want answers about. The clarification violates the rules.
but if a market is "clarified" is it final? Because that is exactly what I want answers about. The clarification violates the rules.
Looks like he just saw "oh, denmark 2-1, let me resolve them as winners"
Looks like he just saw "oh, denmark 2-1, let me resolve them as winners"
<@1356604771208790198> Do I just have to accept or is it possible to make the resolver look into it like, what happens now
<@1356604771208790198> Do I just have to accept or is it possible to make the resolver look into it like, what happens now
when the rules state "If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time."
when the rules state "If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time."
It says "However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead." That is what I want to ask about. The so called Consensus of credible reporter resolved it based on assumptions.
It says "However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead." That is what I want to ask about. The so called Consensus of credible reporter resolved it based on assumptions.
The resolvers basically said, match was 2-1 denmark when it got stopped and interrupted. Therefore denmark won. When the resoultion source themselves, doesnt claim denmark as the winner.
The resolvers basically said, match was 2-1 denmark when it got stopped and interrupted. Therefore denmark won. When the resoultion source themselves, doesnt claim denmark as the winner.
Under IFAB Law 7, abandoned matches are replayed unless organizers determine otherwise the DBU called it cancelled, not a Denmark win. FIFA's Match Centre shows no FT badge. The match was stopped at 65 minutes with 25+ minutes remaining Ukraine could still have equalized or won. No governing body has officially declared Denmark the winner. You're resolving on an assumption, not official statistics as your rules require.
Under IFAB Law 7, abandoned matches are replayed unless organizers determine otherwise the DBU called it cancelled, not a Denmark win. FIFA's Match Centre shows no FT badge. The match was stopped at 65 minutes with 25+ minutes remaining Ukraine could still have equalized or won. No governing body has officially declared Denmark the winner. You're resolving on an assumption, not official statistics as your rules require.
ye, that is what I want help about. The resolving is based on assumptions.
ye, that is what I want help about. The resolving is based on assumptions.
Denmark vs Ukraine football
Denmark vs Ukraine football
第 1 / 2 页
下一页 →