Hyperliquidyou're one of those deluded enough to think that paper is worth 5 years and 500k or whatever it is
you're one of those deluded enough to think that paper is worth 5 years and 500k or whatever it is
shuri参与话题 58消息总数 4625
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 4625 条，显示第 2701-2750 条AI will take over and show up the scams these shits are
AI will take over and show up the scams these shits are
money making institutional scam
money making institutional scam
it's a ripoff
it's a ripoff
it's not cool
it's not cool
200x if he could
200x if he could
there was also James Wynn with 50x on billions of notional?
there was also James Wynn with 50x on billions of notional?
We all know your reason is all me me me rather than looking at the big picture. Can tell.
We all know your reason is all me me me rather than looking at the big picture. Can tell.
you wouldn't get it.
you wouldn't get it.
/USDH pairs need to be settled since USDH shutting down
/USDH pairs need to be settled since USDH shutting down
oh i thought it was a crypto <:skull:1440896093058760787>
oh i thought it was a crypto <:skull:1440896093058760787>
leave your little kelly to others, we can pass
leave your little kelly to others, we can pass
So your insult makes no sense?
So your insult makes no sense?
You also know implementing 200x is probably beneficial in value accrual to HYPE holders? More volume, more fees?
You also know implementing 200x is probably beneficial in value accrual to HYPE holders? More volume, more fees?
stop being so bullish or we're going to have to cut this rally short
stop being so bullish or we're going to have to cut this rally short
<:peepoclown:1268996199185252453>
<:peepoclown:1268996199185252453>
🤡
🤡
You can't give an answer objective or not with regards to what I said about extreme volatility at the very least. 10/10, 200x on BTC would have destroyed users on here even more
You can't give an answer objective or not with regards to what I said about extreme volatility at the very least. 10/10, 200x on BTC would have destroyed users on here even more
You're not reading / responding to the actual issues raised.
You're not reading / responding to the actual issues raised.
protecting the HLP isn't a primary reason
protecting the HLP isn't a primary reason
it has less and less to do with the HLP, the HLP is in the process of deprecation in the long term
it has less and less to do with the HLP, the HLP is in the process of deprecation in the long term
Status : Converted
Status : Converted
yes <https://docs.trade.xyz/consolidated-resources/specification-index-ipops>
yes <https://docs.trade.xyz/consolidated-resources/specification-index-ipops>
> SPCX tracks the value of 1 share of Class A common stock in Space Exploration Technologies Corp. SpaceX designs, manufactures, and launches rockets and spacecraft; operates Starlink, a satellite internet network providing global broadband connectivity; and wholly owns xAI, an artificial intelligence company developing frontier AI models.
> SPCX tracks the value of 1 share of Class A common stock in Space Exploration Technologies Corp. SpaceX designs, manufactures, and launches rockets and spacecraft; operates Starlink, a satellite internet network providing global broadband connectivity; and wholly owns xAI, an artificial intelligence company developing frontier AI models.
https://docs.trade.xyz/consolidated-resources/specification-index oracle looks updated to me according to docs, but idk
https://docs.trade.xyz/consolidated-resources/specification-index oracle looks updated to me according to docs, but idk
You can trade on those other platforms offering higher leverage, but that comes with its own set of risks and costs I hope you're aware of 👍
You can trade on those other platforms offering higher leverage, but that comes with its own set of risks and costs I hope you're aware of 👍
no offense but this entire convo is just self explanatory for why the answer is no to what you want you dismiss what I said about protecting users but clearly haven't thought through these various implications we're talking about here. the topic of higher or lower leverage has been discussed extensively, and in fact HL has opted for lowering leverage on assets and delisting defensively, which is the right move
no offense but this entire convo is just self explanatory for why the answer is no to what you want you dismiss what I said about protecting users but clearly haven't thought through these various implications we're talking about here. the topic of higher or lower leverage has been discussed extensively, and in fact HL has opted for lowering leverage on assets and delisting defensively, which is the right move
hermit crunch
hermit crunch
sounds like
sounds like
probably a market cap index
probably a market cap index
yes thats the one hl fe uses
yes thats the one hl fe uses
what did they do?
what did they do?
so you're long oil
so you're long oil
leverage is a number that attracts retail yes you can easily achieve extreme levels of leverage through short dated and winged options
leverage is a number that attracts retail yes you can easily achieve extreme levels of leverage through short dated and winged options
you can see in the signature what the name of the wallet you're approving is if it is indeed the same as the HL frontend one, report it to the builder as an issue
you can see in the signature what the name of the wallet you're approving is if it is indeed the same as the HL frontend one, report it to the builder as an issue
whoever is implementing the 3rd party frontend is incorrectly doing so
whoever is implementing the 3rd party frontend is incorrectly doing so
if the wallet has the same name, it'll overwrite the old one
if the wallet has the same name, it'll overwrite the old one
such venues probably hugely covered up damages incurred on 10/10
such venues probably hugely covered up damages incurred on 10/10
offering higher and higher leverage without regards for degraded user experience during extreme volatility would be true complacency
offering higher and higher leverage without regards for degraded user experience during extreme volatility would be true complacency
teleporting further than 0.5% means zero equity means ADL
teleporting further than 0.5% means zero equity means ADL
the markets take less capital to move than you think. 200x initial leverage is 400x maintenance leverage is a 0.25% move
the markets take less capital to move than you think. 200x initial leverage is 400x maintenance leverage is a 0.25% move
during illiquid hours
during illiquid hours
we've even seen what was potentially non-insignificant price manipulation on btc targetting hlp before no?
we've even seen what was potentially non-insignificant price manipulation on btc targetting hlp before no?
just trade on a cex if that's what you want
just trade on a cex if that's what you want
and implement kyc?
and implement kyc?
Reality is most people are not qualified to talk about managing the risk of a protocol They are just here to degen trade, not worry about black swan events
Reality is most people are not qualified to talk about managing the risk of a protocol They are just here to degen trade, not worry about black swan events
50x was already bad enough
50x was already bad enough
were you not here?
were you not here?
200x on btc would have resulted in deeper fuckery on 10/10
200x on btc would have resulted in deeper fuckery on 10/10
check announcements on delistings
check announcements on delistings