该用户的聊天记录定位。
Has anyone benchmarked Hyperliquid taker execution latency? Specifically, I’m interested in engine-side latency: order arrival at the matching engine → match/reject decision → response back to client.
Has anyone benchmarked Hyperliquid taker execution latency? Specifically, I’m interested in engine-side latency: order arrival at the matching engine → match/reject decision → response back to client.
Maybe do you remember what was the order submition latency back then ?
Maybe do you remember what was the order submition latency back then ?
Ohh, thanks. Seems like they’re back to matching orders in Excel.
Ohh, thanks. Seems like they’re back to matching orders in Excel.
What is going on with BTC Markets’ taker latency? I have colocation, and the taker delay is 250 ms, so I would expect orders to be filled within roughly 300 ms. However, during high-traffic periods, I receive responses only after 800–4500 ms. Has it always been like this? What is happening with the matching / CLOB engine? Are they planning to fix this?
What is going on with BTC Markets’ taker latency? I have colocation, and the taker delay is 250 ms, so I would expect orders to be filled within roughly 300 ms. However, during high-traffic periods, I receive responses only after 800–4500 ms. Has it always been like this? What is happening with the matching / CLOB engine? Are they planning to fix this?
Hyperliquid
Polymarket