PolymarketKill me
Kill me
satatardy参与话题 7消息总数 69
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 69 条，显示第 1-50 条These new sports fees man
These new sports fees man
Check the rules, was it regular time (90 min plus stoppage) only?
Check the rules, was it regular time (90 min plus stoppage) only?
Update the status as well
Update the status as well
I'm seeing fake prices too, from REST not websockets though
I'm seeing fake prices too, from REST not websockets though
Thx
Thx
Nvm
Nvm
Ah I see status updated
Ah I see status updated
Is maintenance done? <@707597210845446214>
Is maintenance done? <@707597210845446214>
Hm I see stuff moving
Hm I see stuff moving
Specifically
Specifically
What is frozen?
What is frozen?
If the taker paid fees in tokens like you're saying, then there would be a discrepancy between the amount of tokens they receive and the amount the 2 makers received, but in fact they match up. Got it brah?
If the taker paid fees in tokens like you're saying, then there would be a discrepancy between the amount of tokens they receive and the amount the 2 makers received, but in fact they match up. Got it brah?
Also the token amounts for the taker and 2 makers match up, wouldn't there be a discrepancy if it was taken as fees
Also the token amounts for the taker and 2 makers match up, wouldn't there be a discrepancy if it was taken as fees
I send lots of taker orders on markets with fees and I haven't gotten weird amounts like this
I send lots of taker orders on markets with fees and I haven't gotten weird amounts like this
Oh I thought all fees were in pusd now
Oh I thought all fees were in pusd now
I'm just surprised coz I've never seen any share amount that's not a multiple of 0.01
I'm just surprised coz I've never seen any share amount that's not a multiple of 0.01
Ok but since when can you send an order for 50.157891 shs?
Ok but since when can you send an order for 50.157891 shs?
Anyway if you just look at wallet 0x39AaEd185b92e99a78249610cc14A589B764583C, they receive 11.157891 shs
Anyway if you just look at wallet 0x39AaEd185b92e99a78249610cc14A589B764583C, they receive 11.157891 shs
Where are you getting 305 from
Where are you getting 305 from
Here's the transaction, you can see weird numbers of shs were transferred
Here's the transaction, you can see weird numbers of shs were transferred
https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x09c9a98e36f7722905b4869bff36ecd7db7522791d0105cb04bc19ce1d9176b9
https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x09c9a98e36f7722905b4869bff36ecd7db7522791d0105cb04bc19ce1d9176b9
And even so, trading a number of shs that's not a multiple of 0.01 shouldn't be possible right
And even so, trading a number of shs that's not a multiple of 0.01 shouldn't be possible right
It's not an average, it shows that as a single maker order
It's not an average, it shows that as a single maker order
Does anyone know what happened with this trade (trade id 'dcde0dfc-7a13-4b45-bd9c-8a0e8d0e070a')? The taker order is for 50.157891 shares which I thought was impossible (usually it's a multiple of 0.01), and it traded with a maker order at a price of 0.2400000143396274, which should also be impossible
Does anyone know what happened with this trade (trade id 'dcde0dfc-7a13-4b45-bd9c-8a0e8d0e070a')? The taker order is for 50.157891 shares which I thought was impossible (usually it's a multiple of 0.01), and it traded with a maker order at a price of 0.2400000143396274, which should also be impossible
I'll take that as a no
I'll take that as a no
<@886456112201728000> <@1356604771208790198> yeah but if we've already reached a tier, we won't be backpaid the bonus? so we're just getting scammed for no reason
<@886456112201728000> <@1356604771208790198> yeah but if we've already reached a tier, we won't be backpaid the bonus? so we're just getting scammed for no reason
<@886456112201728000> so are we just getting scammed out of any level up bonuses that we already reached?
<@886456112201728000> so are we just getting scammed out of any level up bonuses that we already reached?
aight
aight
<@886456112201728000> why no taker rebates today?
<@886456112201728000> why no taker rebates today?
But yeah aside from polymarket's incompetence I posted here because you can actually save on taker fees by sending your orders differently, even when they result in the exact same trades, so I suggest anyone here who pays significant taker fees should read it
But yeah aside from polymarket's incompetence I posted here because you can actually save on taker fees by sending your orders differently, even when they result in the exact same trades, so I suggest anyone here who pays significant taker fees should read it
They genuinely just seem lazy and short-sighted idk what else to say
They genuinely just seem lazy and short-sighted idk what else to say
Because the taker fees are calculated on the average price but the maker fees are calculated per level
Because the taker fees are calculated on the average price but the maker fees are calculated per level
That's different, the inconsistency here is caused by them using different formulas for taker fees and maker rebates
That's different, the inconsistency here is caused by them using different formulas for taker fees and maker rebates
It's such an easy fix too but they chose to be lazy and incompetent as usual
It's such an easy fix too but they chose to be lazy and incompetent as usual
Someone from polymarket actually gave a response on Cantina basically acknowledging that this is how it works but tried to claim there's nothing wrong with it. That finding was disputed and then they just ignored it
Someone from polymarket actually gave a response on Cantina basically acknowledging that this is how it works but tried to claim there's nothing wrong with it. That finding was disputed and then they just ignored it
It's pretty easy to check, just make a taker order that trades with maker orders at multiple different price levels, preferably quite far apart so the difference is obvious. Then calculate the fees using the average price for the whole trade or by calculating them per level. Then check the USDC amount transferred onchain and you'll see it matches the first method
It's pretty easy to check, just make a taker order that trades with maker orders at multiple different price levels, preferably quite far apart so the difference is obvious. Then calculate the fees using the average price for the whole trade or by calculating them per level. Then check the USDC amount transferred onchain and you'll see it matches the first method
To be clear I don't mean average price over the whole day or something, just over a single taker order that trades with maker orders at multiple different price levels
To be clear I don't mean average price over the whole day or something, just over a single taker order that trades with maker orders at multiple different price levels
They are, you can check
They are, you can check
They do just use average price, that's the problem. The correct way would be to do it per level
They do just use average price, that's the problem. The correct way would be to do it per level
I've checked onchain and the taker fee numbers I see always exactly match what I expect so I'm pretty confident that polymarket is indeed calculating taker fees in this buggy/inconsistent way
I've checked onchain and the taker fee numbers I see always exactly match what I expect so I'm pretty confident that polymarket is indeed calculating taker fees in this buggy/inconsistent way
These kind of bugs always seem to "conveniently" work in polymarket's favour
These kind of bugs always seem to "conveniently" work in polymarket's favour
Ok well let me know if you see something more concrete. I can also help check for you if you give me trade info and links to polygonscan
Ok well let me know if you see something more concrete. I can also help check for you if you give me trade info and links to polygonscan
The higher fees only happen to taker orders that trade with maker orders at multiple different price levels. Do you have an example of getting lower fees than you expected? I've never seen that
The higher fees only happen to taker orders that trade with maker orders at multiple different price levels. Do you have an example of getting lower fees than you expected? I've never seen that
It's handwritten
It's handwritten
Just letting fellow devs know that taker fees are broken and as a result: 1) Taker fees are often higher (and never lower) than what you'd expect from looking at fills and using the formula from the docs 2) Taker fees and maker rebates from the same trades don't always line up as they should 3) You can be charged different fees for the exact same taker trades, depending on what orders were sent to make those trades 4) Buying shares in a winning outcome can actually cause you to lose money Number 4 is the most alarming imo since making winning trades should never cause you to lose money, but number 3 is the most actionable since you can save money on taker fees by sending different orders, even while making the exact same trades. This was reported on Cantina but polymarket decided to be lazy as usual and ignore it. I've attached the full report
Just letting fellow devs know that taker fees are broken and as a result: 1) Taker fees are often higher (and never lower) than what you'd expect from looking at fills and using the formula from the docs 2) Taker fees and maker rebates from the same trades don't always line up as they should 3) You can be charged different fees for the exact same taker trades, depending on what orders were sent to make those trades 4) Buying shares in a winning outcome can actually cause you to lose money Number 4 is the most alarming imo since making winning trades should never cause you to lose money, but number 3 is the most actionable since you can save money on taker fees by sending different orders, even while making the exact same trades. This was reported on Cantina but polymarket decided to be lazy as usual and ignore it. I've attached the full report
So you just aren't paying level up bonuses if we already reached a particular level?
So you just aren't paying level up bonuses if we already reached a particular level?
And I get an orderID
And I get an orderID
And no errorMsg
And no errorMsg
Success is "True"
Success is "True"
第 1 / 2 页
下一页 →