<@1402074242211643422> <@1503846101860487170>
<@1402074242211643422> <@1503846101860487170>
该用户的聊天记录定位。
<@1402074242211643422> <@1503846101860487170>
<@1402074242211643422> <@1503846101860487170>
Apparently they mix in the "unlocked" episodes, which are part of the series, even though they also have their own dedicated page on IMDb.
Apparently they mix in the "unlocked" episodes, which are part of the series, even though they also have their own dedicated page on IMDb.
So yeah, market title/rules are wrong and should have said S28 **Episode 3** instead of Episode 2. The date is correct.
So yeah, market title/rules are wrong and should have said S28 **Episode 3** instead of Episode 2. The date is correct.
Yet the "unlocked" one is shown as S28 E2 of BB on IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0251497/episodes/?season=28
Yet the "unlocked" one is shown as S28 E2 of BB on IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0251497/episodes/?season=28
That is a different show, isn't it?
That is a different show, isn't it?
Oh I see it's marked closed press on the initial WH Pool report. Damn.
Oh I see it's marked closed press on the initial WH Pool report. Damn.
Wut. Changed your mind? :')
Wut. Changed your mind? :')
What will trump say during Swearing-In Ceremony? Million / Billion / Trillion 10+ Land 3+ Farm / Farmer 3+ Family Save America Death Tax No Tax MAGA Border Criminal 11,888 Joe / Biden First Term
What will trump say during Swearing-In Ceremony? Million / Billion / Trillion 10+ Land 3+ Farm / Farmer 3+ Family Save America Death Tax No Tax MAGA Border Criminal 11,888 Joe / Biden First Term
<@1402074242211643422> <@1503846101860487170>
<@1402074242211643422> <@1503846101860487170>
Tesla is juicy
Tesla is juicy
<@1503846101860487170> <@1402074242211643422> suggestion for Mentions Rules PDF: add a version and last modification date at the top of the PDF so it's easier to track if/when things change. It's hard to understand if one has to read everything from scratch again or not.
<@1503846101860487170> <@1402074242211643422> suggestion for Mentions Rules PDF: add a version and last modification date at the top of the PDF so it's easier to track if/when things change. It's hard to understand if one has to read everything from scratch again or not.
well we had an esports mention market where the crowd shouted "U S A!, U S A!" and it resolved yes
well we had an esports mention market where the crowd shouted "U S A!, U S A!" and it resolved yes
the classic "said by anyone" would make sense tbh
the classic "said by anyone" would make sense tbh
yea it is clear as day in the new rules
yea it is clear as day in the new rules
grand finals market might be cool
grand finals market might be cool
Besides, if he is present, currently PM, and the speaker says "we now come to prime minister's questions, let the front benches change over" before giving him the word... that is absolutely undisputable.
Besides, if he is present, currently PM, and the speaker says "we now come to prime minister's questions, let the front benches change over" before giving him the word... that is absolutely undisputable.
He is entertaining to watch during PMQs and makes for good markets. We can have at least another 2 before he is replaced.
He is entertaining to watch during PMQs and makes for good markets. We can have at least another 2 before he is replaced.
We already had one PMQ market after resignation that went just fine, if you are saying this because he resigned. It's pretty clear and widely accepted that he is still PM and will continue to be at least until July 17.
We already had one PMQ market after resignation that went just fine, if you are saying this because he resigned. It's pretty clear and widely accepted that he is still PM and will continue to be at least until July 17.
Just noticed we don't have a PMQs market today <:pepecry:1480174599093096560>
Just noticed we don't have a PMQs market today <:pepecry:1480174599093096560>
<@1434925821667180728> <@1402074242211643422> hmm guys this market is done, better remove this banner lol
<@1434925821667180728> <@1402074242211643422> hmm guys this market is done, better remove this banner lol
Won't do much. Anyone can literally create accounts and fake the numbers pushing an infinite amount of commits whenever they want. You can give them 1 day, 1 week or 1 month to "adjust" and the problem would still be present. Also, when and how do you define the final number if you allow changes past deadline? This market simply shouldn't exist.
Won't do much. Anyone can literally create accounts and fake the numbers pushing an infinite amount of commits whenever they want. You can give them 1 day, 1 week or 1 month to "adjust" and the problem would still be present. Also, when and how do you define the final number if you allow changes past deadline? This market simply shouldn't exist.
<@1400131860612513894> <@1434925821667180728> <@1402074242211643422> sorry to bother with a ping but this situation may require some attention as there is only 1 day to go for that market
<@1400131860612513894> <@1434925821667180728> <@1402074242211643422> sorry to bother with a ping but this situation may require some attention as there is only 1 day to go for that market
Now 12/12 of the "Live" markets are actually over ☠️
Now 12/12 of the "Live" markets are actually over ☠️
yeah what i was suggesting on the other thread, layout / ux needs improvement
yeah what i was suggesting on the other thread, layout / ux needs improvement
<@1402074242211643422> <@1434925821667180728> 9 out of 13 markets in /mentions marked as "Live" are already over 🥶
<@1402074242211643422> <@1434925821667180728> 9 out of 13 markets in /mentions marked as "Live" are already over 🥶
No better date to put 250 than the actual anniversary lol
No better date to put 250 than the actual anniversary lol
after all why is there a specific clause about it in the rules if we ain't using them
after all why is there a specific clause about it in the rules if we ain't using them
Make Number Strikes Great Again
Make Number Strikes Great Again
bring it on I don't care lol
bring it on I don't care lol
11,888 for example
11,888 for example
We now have the rules, we can start putting back some numbers lol
We now have the rules, we can start putting back some numbers lol
I wanna see a 250 it's been so long
I wanna see a 250 it's been so long
250 5+
250 5+
No lol why would it
No lol why would it
From the rules as soon as it shows up it's good
From the rules as soon as it shows up it's good
> [...] beginning from the moment the game timer first appears on screen [...] > Any commentary made before the game timer appears on screen will not be considered
> [...] beginning from the moment the game timer first appears on screen [...] > Any commentary made before the game timer appears on screen will not be considered
IDK lol
IDK lol
It is a "personal" account if the guy runs a show?
It is a "personal" account if the guy runs a show?
Either have a list or don't.
Either have a list or don't.
Insane having a list and then cucking it with this crap lol. That list was made exactly to avoid random tiktoks or instagram reels... sure the reporters work for whatever agency but those are still random tiktoks and insta reels. There are also probably thousands of reporters that don't even have a decent following and could post stuff like that.
Insane having a list and then cucking it with this crap lol. That list was made exactly to avoid random tiktoks or instagram reels... sure the reporters work for whatever agency but those are still random tiktoks and insta reels. There are also probably thousands of reporters that don't even have a decent following and could post stuff like that.
great
great
npnp
npnp
<@1434925821667180728> <@1402074242211643422> idk if you are aware or this has been noticed by the team, it seems to be an issue most prominent in mentions, but I saw a lot of profiles where mention markets show up with blank/missing icons in history/positions and also ALL as losses of $0 regardless if they were a win or a loss. See: https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/1460719234249130288/1516462109360132176.
<@1434925821667180728> <@1402074242211643422> idk if you are aware or this has been noticed by the team, it seems to be an issue most prominent in mentions, but I saw a lot of profiles where mention markets show up with blank/missing icons in history/positions and also ALL as losses of $0 regardless if they were a win or a loss. See: https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/1460719234249130288/1516462109360132176.
> If the event occurs within the fourteen-day window but with a change of venue, format, or medium (for example, moved to a different location, or changed from in person to virtual, except for being closed to press), remarks made during the event will count. Not too clear what "except for being closed to press" means here 🤔. I suppose it means that if the event becomes closed-press then it should resolve as NQE, but could be worded more clearly.
> If the event occurs within the fourteen-day window but with a change of venue, format, or medium (for example, moved to a different location, or changed from in person to virtual, except for being closed to press), remarks made during the event will count. Not too clear what "except for being closed to press" means here 🤔. I suppose it means that if the event becomes closed-press then it should resolve as NQE, but could be worded more clearly.
> If clips of old interviews or prerecorded videos in which {person} is speaking Seems like this should be {entity}, like in the rest of the document.
> If clips of old interviews or prerecorded videos in which {person} is speaking Seems like this should be {entity}, like in the rest of the document.
It seems like you should either change rule 1 to say *"by the second calendar day after {date}"*, or change rule 2 to say *"within one calendar day"*, for consistency.
It seems like you should either change rule 1 to say *"by the second calendar day after {date}"*, or change rule 2 to say *"within one calendar day"*, for consistency.
So what do you do, resolve all No at Jan 3 12 AM ET, or wait until Jan 4 12 AM ET?
So what do you do, resolve all No at Jan 3 12 AM ET, or wait until Jan 4 12 AM ET?
However, by rule 2 above, we have *2 calendar days* for a rescheduling chance.
However, by rule 2 above, we have *2 calendar days* for a rescheduling chance.
By rule 1 above, an event scheduled Jan 1 that is not aired Jan 1, would become NQE exactly at Jan 3 12:00 AM ET, and every other strike goes "No".
By rule 1 above, an event scheduled Jan 1 that is not aired Jan 1, would become NQE exactly at Jan 3 12:00 AM ET, and every other strike goes "No".
1. If the event is definitively cancelled, or is otherwise not aired **by the calendar day after {date}** at 11:59 PM ET, the “No Qualifying Event” outcome will resolve to “Yes” and all other outcomes will resolve to “No” 2. If the event is postponed or rescheduled, a new date is publicly announced **within two calendar days** of the originally scheduled start time [...]
1. If the event is definitively cancelled, or is otherwise not aired **by the calendar day after {date}** at 11:59 PM ET, the “No Qualifying Event” outcome will resolve to “Yes” and all other outcomes will resolve to “No” 2. If the event is postponed or rescheduled, a new date is publicly announced **within two calendar days** of the originally scheduled start time [...]