Polymarket10 mins later: "We never said something like this"
10 mins later: "We never said something like this"
JustBetter参与话题 1消息总数 104
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 104 条，显示第 1-50 条🙁
🙁
what did you win gum
what did you win gum
No they won't
No they won't
you are just denying the truth which is silly
you are just denying the truth which is silly
They can have the right to enrich and still freeze the enrichment during the negotiations
They can have the right to enrich and still freeze the enrichment during the negotiations
btw, the right to enrich and freezing do not contradict each other
btw, the right to enrich and freezing do not contradict each other
Most of them argue that Iran has the right to enrich, which in the meantime the Trump market on 7c
Most of them argue that Iran has the right to enrich, which in the meantime the Trump market on 7c
it is
it is
Sure pal
Sure pal
I have a feeling you will monitor this chat in your dreams as well
I have a feeling you will monitor this chat in your dreams as well
You said you're going to sleep
You said you're going to sleep
he has limits both sides
he has limits both sides
Why not? There are a lot of credible sources explaining exactly what it means. You guys just want to ignore this by saying "it's just an opinion" "we still don't know" or "the IEAE can't check"
Why not? There are a lot of credible sources explaining exactly what it means. You guys just want to ignore this by saying "it's just an opinion" "we still don't know" or "the IEAE can't check"
The status is known by many sources, you just say they are taken out of context or misquoted
The status is known by many sources, you just say they are taken out of context or misquoted
seems like you came mad
seems like you came mad
vinitard
vinitard
can you understand it?
can you understand it?
it either yes or no, it cannot be in the middle
it either yes or no, it cannot be in the middle
So again, according to this you basically say that they are enriching
So again, according to this you basically say that they are enriching
yeah maybe i will read it this time
yeah maybe i will read it this time
Nope, I see that p4 claims that maintaining the status quo means they agreed to enrich for non-military purposes which suppose to resolve trump market
Nope, I see that p4 claims that maintaining the status quo means they agreed to enrich for non-military purposes which suppose to resolve trump market
when you have nothing to say you just paste it, which is very lame
when you have nothing to say you just paste it, which is very lame
here we go again
here we go again
<@1428890877744644240> He just disappeared bro lmao
<@1428890877744644240> He just disappeared bro lmao
How is it that not 0 or 1?!?!?! If they agreed to maintain the status quo, it would either keep enriching or not enriching!!
How is it that not 0 or 1?!?!?! If they agreed to maintain the status quo, it would either keep enriching or not enriching!!
You say it does not matter, and then you say the only thing that matters is that it is not ending enrichment If it is not ending enrichment, then you are basically arguing that at this point they have agreed to continue enrichment, which is supposed to resolve the Trump market
You say it does not matter, and then you say the only thing that matters is that it is not ending enrichment If it is not ending enrichment, then you are basically arguing that at this point they have agreed to continue enrichment, which is supposed to resolve the Trump market
hahahah
hahahah
What is the status quo according to your low iq brain?
What is the status quo according to your low iq brain?
Please tell me what they agreed on in the status quo
Please tell me what they agreed on in the status quo
ieae has nothing with this market
ieae has nothing with this market
So it agrees on enrichment?
So it agrees on enrichment?
so what did they say according to you?
so what did they say according to you?
Is the team monitoring the dispute?
Is the team monitoring the dispute?
They have nothing bro, it is pointless to argue with them They are not going to change their opinion anyway
They have nothing bro, it is pointless to argue with them They are not going to change their opinion anyway
seems like they want to resolve both to no..
seems like they want to resolve both to no..
https://tenor.com/view/minions-blah-blah-blah-roll-eyes-eyeroll-whatever-gif-16216173
https://tenor.com/view/minions-blah-blah-blah-roll-eyes-eyeroll-whatever-gif-16216173
Of course it means something, and Jaroslav posts exactly what it means they just want to ignore it Btw the primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Of course it means something, and Jaroslav posts exactly what it means they just want to ignore it Btw the primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
because he knows it's a Y
because he knows it's a Y
propose
propose
You getting draineddddd
You getting draineddddd
Soon the “ace” will come out
Soon the “ace” will come out
Be awake, we need you
Be awake, we need you
Dispooted
Dispooted
and price is 45c
and price is 45c
Kuwait airspace is not closed
Kuwait airspace is not closed
I don't see any part in the rules that says that time matters. If it's a new notam (which it is), it should be resolved to Y
I don't see any part in the rules that says that time matters. If it's a new notam (which it is), it should be resolved to Y
<@941405798096076880> please
<@941405798096076880> please
but the portion still needs to be verified
but the portion still needs to be verified
wtf
wtf
第 1 / 3 页
下一页 →