聊天记录
共 493 条，显示第 151-200 条
i almost never use my UI to manually trade except for testing purposes. 99% of it is performance displays that are customizable to sort various monitors and strategies for easy review or live trade monitoring (when I feel like doing that). I have custom settings for all of my strategies and monitors and the UI lets me tweak those without having to interact with the codebase or PG database tables directly. it would be a nightmare to stay on top of all of my various strats without a custom UI
i almost never use my UI to manually trade except for testing purposes. 99% of it is performance displays that are customizable to sort various monitors and strategies for easy review or live trade monitoring (when I feel like doing that). I have custom settings for all of my strategies and monitors and the UI lets me tweak those without having to interact with the codebase or PG database tables directly. it would be a nightmare to stay on top of all of my various strats without a custom UI
well first you need subaccount support on the mobile app which doesn't exist atm
well first you need subaccount support on the mobile app which doesn't exist atm
Frankly that's the fun part
Frankly that's the fun part
It is so ridiculously easy to build a UI with an LLM I don't understand why anyone even remotely serious about this stuff wouldn't do it...
It is so ridiculously easy to build a UI with an LLM I don't understand why anyone even remotely serious about this stuff wouldn't do it...
Lol
Lol
Guess it depends on if what you're looking at is last traded price or best bid/ask. If someone wanted to throw a 10c resting order on every far OTM strike on open knowing there was little chance any would fill it wouldn't be hard to do
Guess it depends on if what you're looking at is last traded price or best bid/ask. If someone wanted to throw a 10c resting order on every far OTM strike on open knowing there was little chance any would fill it wouldn't be hard to do
Maybe someone else has a bug in their code and you get a stray fill here or there. Not that uncommon in the crypto markets
Maybe someone else has a bug in their code and you get a stray fill here or there. Not that uncommon in the crypto markets
Sounds like some new actor placing spam orders. Not like they're going to fill so as long as you can spare the tokens why not
Sounds like some new actor placing spam orders. Not like they're going to fill so as long as you can spare the tokens why not
used to be pretty rare but it's happened at least half a dozen times today
used to be pretty rare but it's happened at least half a dozen times today
anyone noticing an uptick in account/subaccount balance reports errors today? i'm seeing an uptick today in instances of settlement funds being reported deposited into the account but still showing the positions open. it usually fixes itself within a couple seconds and reports the zeroed out positions but it's enough to throw my accounting tables for a loop
anyone noticing an uptick in account/subaccount balance reports errors today? i'm seeing an uptick today in instances of settlement funds being reported deposited into the account but still showing the positions open. it usually fixes itself within a couple seconds and reports the zeroed out positions but it's enough to throw my accounting tables for a loop
My head is thinking about a stop/limit type thing but I don't know how that could work in this scenario or with this api specifically
My head is thinking about a stop/limit type thing but I don't know how that could work in this scenario or with this api specifically
Thought about doing a probatory trade to start but I don't think I can afford the delay on a full position fill
Thought about doing a probatory trade to start but I don't think I can afford the delay on a full position fill
Random execution question, wonder if anyone has any ideas
I have a strat that scopes high implied probability contracts close to expiration and sweeps them. It works well but I'd like to put a floor on the price I'm willing to take to account for anomalous market conditions where, say, my monitor might see a 90c price but by the time the round trip happens it's closer to 50c within ms
Random execution question, wonder if anyone has any ideas
I have a strat that scopes high implied probability contracts close to expiration and sweeps them. It works well but I'd like to put a floor on the price I'm willing to take to account for anomalous market conditions where, say, my monitor might see a 90c price but by the time the round trip happens it's closer to 50c within ms
Working RFQS sounds like a real pain. Is there even any alpha there anymore?
Working RFQS sounds like a real pain. Is there even any alpha there anymore?
So is it confirmed these rfq 400's were part of a dragnet ban on spammers?
So is it confirmed these rfq 400's were part of a dragnet ban on spammers?
To be clear we saw issues last year. Not this specific issue
To be clear we saw issues last year. Not this specific issue
We saw it last year when the NFL season started up during a huge growth spurt
We saw it last year when the NFL season started up during a huge growth spurt
It's no coincidence this started when the WC kicked off
It's no coincidence this started when the WC kicked off
That's worth the trouble as far as I'm concerned
That's worth the trouble as far as I'm concerned
Just speaking for myself I got a personal POC right away
Just speaking for myself I got a personal POC right away
If you're running a legit operation I would suggest incorporating and getting an institutional account so you have a dedicated support point if contact
If you're running a legit operation I would suggest incorporating and getting an institutional account so you have a dedicated support point if contact
If I had to guess there was some automated traffic algo introduced that caught some legit MMs up in a dragnet for spambots
If I had to guess there was some automated traffic algo introduced that caught some legit MMs up in a dragnet for spambots
Welp
Welp
So they asked us to switch over to bid ask semantics for order placement but then only had yes no semantics in orders
So they asked us to switch over to bid ask semantics for order placement but then only had yes no semantics in orders
I remember now. They added book_side. Outcome_side was the default but that way there was no record in orders of your bid/ask setting on placement
I remember now. They added book_side. Outcome_side was the default but that way there was no record in orders of your bid/ask setting on placement
Ah those heady days of...8 weeks ago
Ah those heady days of...8 weeks ago
Yeah it's still useful but if it never existed I don't think I'd be clamoring for it right now
Yeah it's still useful but if it never existed I don't think I'd be clamoring for it right now
It's funny I feel like a conversation I had with James led to the whole outcome_side/book_side thing and for the life of me I don't remember why I requested it. I've gotten so used to the bid/ask semantics now
It's funny I feel like a conversation I had with James led to the whole outcome_side/book_side thing and for the life of me I don't remember why I requested it. I've gotten so used to the bid/ask semantics now
I don't deal with RFQs so I don't know all the mechanics. I know there are spamming concerns. I'm not sure how that could manifest on the response side but I'm sure it's possible. And given the volume it might even be something unintended in someone's code that Kalshi flags as malignant
I don't deal with RFQs so I don't know all the mechanics. I know there are spamming concerns. I'm not sure how that could manifest on the response side but I'm sure it's possible. And given the volume it might even be something unintended in someone's code that Kalshi flags as malignant
Especially if they view it as bot spamming. I'm not accusing you of that but if that were the kind of thing they were dealing with
Especially if they view it as bot spamming. I'm not accusing you of that but if that were the kind of thing they were dealing with
If it was a crackdown on some sort of behavior I wouldn't be shocked for them to simply sweep it under the rug
If it was a crackdown on some sort of behavior I wouldn't be shocked for them to simply sweep it under the rug
Rightfully or not it seems isolated to specific users. The entire RFQ system has not been down for a week
Rightfully or not it seems isolated to specific users. The entire RFQ system has not been down for a week
I don't know it sure sounds like some of you got blocked for spamming RFQs
I don't know it sure sounds like some of you got blocked for spamming RFQs
Subaccounts in general are still pretty new but I've never had an issue transferring between valid subs on the prediction api
Subaccounts in general are still pretty new but I've never had an issue transferring between valid subs on the prediction api
Oh this is perps? No clue haven't touched it yet. Brand new so there might be bugs
Oh this is perps? No clue haven't touched it yet. Brand new so there might be bugs
I'm assuming your signing the posts correctly. Are you able to get subaccount balances, etc?
I'm assuming your signing the posts correctly. Are you able to get subaccount balances, etc?
As in you're trying to deposit external funds directly into a specific subaccount? Because all external funds go in and out of 0. Transfers between subaccounts are pretty straightforward so it is something on your end if you can't move available funds between them
As in you're trying to deposit external funds directly into a specific subaccount? Because all external funds go in and out of 0. Transfers between subaccounts are pretty straightforward so it is something on your end if you can't move available funds between them
Weird energy in here today
Weird energy in here today
No, but you do to use FIX for anything
No, but you do to use FIX for anything
FIX requires premier tier
FIX requires premier tier
And that means blood in the water
And that means blood in the water
But NOT understanding the api is definitely a DISADVANTAGE
But NOT understanding the api is definitely a DISADVANTAGE
I haven't really started playing with it yet. I suppose it's easy enough to tie close orders to the underlying price feed and replicate the functionality. Just curious how particularly the SL functions were working in the UI
I haven't really started playing with it yet. I suppose it's easy enough to tie close orders to the underlying price feed and replicate the functionality. Just curious how particularly the SL functions were working in the UI
It was part of the fixed point migration a few months back. They were returning parallel values in different formats to make the transition easier. Still some artifacts remaining
It was part of the fixed point migration a few months back. They were returning parallel values in different formats to make the transition easier. Still some artifacts remaining
Realized pnl is just simple arithmetic. Not sure what you're asking
Realized pnl is just simple arithmetic. Not sure what you're asking
Scalp scalp scalp scalp scalp
Scalp scalp scalp scalp scalp
If we can get the profit taking and stop loss functions into the perps api...
If we can get the profit taking and stop loss functions into the perps api...
<@1294044400065839177> <@1318254066752552991> Am I missing something with the perps api or is there no way to set PT/SL levels like you can in the UI?
<@1294044400065839177> <@1318254066752552991> Am I missing something with the perps api or is there no way to set PT/SL levels like you can in the UI?
Doesn't seem to be any way to set profit taking/stop loss levels through the API but there is in the UI
Doesn't seem to be any way to set profit taking/stop loss levels through the API but there is in the UI
So perps are live huh? Anyone playing with them yet?
So perps are live huh? Anyone playing with them yet?
Kalshi