KalshiI mean if that's your priority I don't know why you'd think they would consolidate it
I mean if that's your priority I don't know why you'd think they would consolidate it
betaclone参与话题 48消息总数 493
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 493 条，显示第 1-50 条Oh yeah, the SDK is bunk
Oh yeah, the SDK is bunk
The problem with testing fills and therefore positions is that there needs to be actual volume in the demo env and that's a crap shoot. Now of you know you can get a fill in demo then fetching fills, positions etc should be straightforward Can you pull account balance? That's the easiest way to know if your payloads are formatted correctly since it doesn't rely on anything except a valid acct/key
The problem with testing fills and therefore positions is that there needs to be actual volume in the demo env and that's a crap shoot. Now of you know you can get a fill in demo then fetching fills, positions etc should be straightforward Can you pull account balance? That's the easiest way to know if your payloads are formatted correctly since it doesn't rely on anything except a valid acct/key
Same
Same
It was a TON of work
It was a TON of work
I spent months building my own paper trading system based on prod
I spent months building my own paper trading system based on prod
Also perps are BRAND new so there's not a lof of experience anywhere in what differences there might be in the API's
Also perps are BRAND new so there's not a lof of experience anywhere in what differences there might be in the API's
We'd all love there to be a fully functional demo.env in principle. But there isn't so we soldier on Now something like fetching positions should be straightforward enough. That's like a problem on your end and it's hard to diagnose that without seeing your payloads
We'd all love there to be a fully functional demo.env in principle. But there isn't so we soldier on Now something like fetching positions should be straightforward enough. That's like a problem on your end and it's hard to diagnose that without seeing your payloads
And yes I'd imagine most people here who have been doing it long enough ha e donated at least in the 3-4 figures to testing
And yes I'd imagine most people here who have been doing it long enough ha e donated at least in the 3-4 figures to testing
It is what it is. No one can tell you what to do with your capital but in my experience the time wasted in demo far exceeds a small investment you're willing to lose in testing. You can literally trade fractional shares. We're talking at most pennies per test trade
It is what it is. No one can tell you what to do with your capital but in my experience the time wasted in demo far exceeds a small investment you're willing to lose in testing. You can literally trade fractional shares. We're talking at most pennies per test trade
most people here just bite the bullet and test in prod with very small position sizes
most people here just bite the bullet and test in prod with very small position sizes
demo is notoriously buggy and even when it's not it doesn't always accurately reflect how the prod servers work. it's fine to test some simple call and response architecture but you can end up wasting a lot of time getting somethign to work in demo just to find it doesn't work the same in prod
demo is notoriously buggy and even when it's not it doesn't always accurately reflect how the prod servers work. it's fine to test some simple call and response architecture but you can end up wasting a lot of time getting somethign to work in demo just to find it doesn't work the same in prod
You got Tarek's personal email? I'm not trying to rain on your parade but you aren't going to be able to do what you're thinking about doing
You got Tarek's personal email? I'm not trying to rain on your parade but you aren't going to be able to do what you're thinking about doing
Didn't even have to tweak anything. Just free money
Didn't even have to tweak anything. Just free money
https://klipy.com/gifs/dave-chappelle-give-me
https://klipy.com/gifs/dave-chappelle-give-me
I don't know about you guys but this WC traffic on the crypto markets is...
I don't know about you guys but this WC traffic on the crypto markets is...
RFQ's. Go read the docs
RFQ's. Go read the docs
But I'd imagine you'd run into other problems with client side caching that would be a bigger problem before you found some hypothetical API limit
But I'd imagine you'd run into other problems with client side caching that would be a bigger problem before you found some hypothetical API limit
I'm sure there's some practical limit but you'd have to probe to find what it is. Could probably do it pretty simply
I'm sure there's some practical limit but you'd have to probe to find what it is. Could probably do it pretty simply
People come here all the time with the same idea. It's a non starter
People come here all the time with the same idea. It's a non starter
Yeah Valence has some kind of special relationship with Kalshi. You would absolutely be violating TOS and likely federal law doing something like that without the proper credentials and Kalshi agreements which you're probably not going to get
Yeah Valence has some kind of special relationship with Kalshi. You would absolutely be violating TOS and likely federal law doing something like that without the proper credentials and Kalshi agreements which you're probably not going to get
<@1294044400065839177> with the introducrion of sticky crypto wallet addresses for transfers are there any plans for API initiated external deposits and withdrawals?
<@1294044400065839177> with the introducrion of sticky crypto wallet addresses for transfers are there any plans for API initiated external deposits and withdrawals?
Not sure what you mean. If you have an account you can create an API key. That's all you need
Not sure what you mean. If you have an account you can create an API key. That's all you need
No one here has ever heard of anyone actually getting any funding. Don't even know why the web page is still up. Might have been something in the very very early days of the exchange
No one here has ever heard of anyone actually getting any funding. Don't even know why the web page is still up. Might have been something in the very very early days of the exchange
They already have permission tiers for keys
They already have permission tiers for keys
Seems like it wouldn't be that complicated server side
Seems like it wouldn't be that complicated server side
You could do it client side. I'd have to think about the exact mechanism but I know it could be done. I would actually expect them to add this functionality eventually as the main point of subs was for institutional accts with multiple traders
You could do it client side. I'd have to think about the exact mechanism but I know it could be done. I would actually expect them to add this functionality eventually as the main point of subs was for institutional accts with multiple traders
Not at the moment. What's the use case? Restrict write access for a key to a specific sub?
Not at the moment. What's the use case? Restrict write access for a key to a specific sub?
It is a myth
It is a myth
I believe this is the api freezing out accounts that are not executing enough orders based on accepted quotes. I don't deal with RFQS but this conversation was going around a few weeks ago
I believe this is the api freezing out accounts that are not executing enough orders based on accepted quotes. I don't deal with RFQS but this conversation was going around a few weeks ago
The point is to combine liquidity into a single pool per ticker
The point is to combine liquidity into a single pool per ticker
You are either long or short that position
You are either long or short that position
Everything on the api is based on a single "yes" order book. A positive outcome on given strike
Everything on the api is based on a single "yes" order book. A positive outcome on given strike
Buy no = sell yes
Buy no = sell yes
The order book will absolutely never show buy no. The UI is a mirage. It is skinned for casual users
The order book will absolutely never show buy no. The UI is a mirage. It is skinned for casual users
It's how the exchange works
It's how the exchange works
Lol. It's not a theory
Lol. It's not a theory
It's exactly what the UI is doing when you "buy no" it just isn't dressing it up for you
It's exactly what the UI is doing when you "buy no" it just isn't dressing it up for you
You place an an order on the ask side. This sells a position on the yes order book. That's the same as a no
You place an an order on the ask side. This sells a position on the yes order book. That's the same as a no
So a position of -100 is the same as "owning 100 no contracts" in the UI
So a position of -100 is the same as "owning 100 no contracts" in the UI
There has never been any such thing as a no contract to buy. It's always been strictly a construct of the UI. You have a positive or negative position on the single order book. Buying increases your position by placing bids, selling reduces your position by placing asks
There has never been any such thing as a no contract to buy. It's always been strictly a construct of the UI. You have a positive or negative position on the single order book. Buying increases your position by placing bids, selling reduces your position by placing asks
"Coffee flavored coffee!"
"Coffee flavored coffee!"
I'll figure the rest out on my own
I'll figure the rest out on my own
1 contract for a whole cent, please
1 contract for a whole cent, please
until the bucket refills
until the bucket refills
Account & Security. i don't think you can actually create them through the UI, just transfer between them and rename them
Account & Security. i don't think you can actually create them through the UI, just transfer between them and rename them
well i'm not trying to make any money on single contracts either
well i'm not trying to make any money on single contracts either
can you actually buy 0.01 contracts? i guess it makes sense but it never occurred to me. still just doing single contracts for testing
can you actually buy 0.01 contracts? i guess it makes sense but it never occurred to me. still just doing single contracts for testing
A bug??? In demo??? Couldn't be
A bug??? In demo??? Couldn't be
Doesn't affect me but would think that would be a higher priority/easier
Doesn't affect me but would think that would be a higher priority/easier
第 1 / 10 页
下一页 →