KalshiGranted I haven't tracked it necessarily but on the 15m markets they come in pretty quickly
Granted I haven't tracked it necessarily but on the 15m markets they come in pretty quickly
betaclone参与话题 48消息总数 493
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 493 条，显示第 301-350 条I've never seen a floor strike on a crypto/financial market changed after the initial report
I've never seen a floor strike on a crypto/financial market changed after the initial report
I have asked multiple times for a point of contact to clarify just these questions in the dev tos and even institutional support doesn't have anyone to point me to
I have asked multiple times for a point of contact to clarify just these questions in the dev tos and even institutional support doesn't have anyone to point me to
The thing with TOS in general is they are written by lawyers to be as vague as possible so they can be enforced however they want to enforce them whenever they feel like it. There's no such thing as being 100% certain of anything in any TOS agreement
The thing with TOS in general is they are written by lawyers to be as vague as possible so they can be enforced however they want to enforce them whenever they feel like it. There's no such thing as being 100% certain of anything in any TOS agreement
I don't want to see people get their accts blocked. Less liquidity in the e x change 🤣
I don't want to see people get their accts blocked. Less liquidity in the e x change 🤣
I'm not anyone's babysitter
I'm not anyone's babysitter
To Bruno's point, individual risk tolerance is up to the individual. I just wouldn't be "100% certain" you aren't violating the tos because in my read you definitely are. But go with god
To Bruno's point, individual risk tolerance is up to the individual. I just wouldn't be "100% certain" you aren't violating the tos because in my read you definitely are. But go with god
And I assume you have master admin access to the server?
And I assume you have master admin access to the server?
So how do the api keys get on your server?
So how do the api keys get on your server?
They don't want people building multi user platforms where users store their private credentials on a single 3rd party server. That is very explicit
They don't want people building multi user platforms where users store their private credentials on a single 3rd party server. That is very explicit
"My read" doesn't sound like 100% certain. My read, which has been backed up by mods in here, is the exact opposite
"My read" doesn't sound like 100% certain. My read, which has been backed up by mods in here, is the exact opposite
Kalshi specifically does not want people doing EXACTLY what you and the OP are describing. How diligently do they police it currently? Maybe not at all but the letter of the dev tos prohibits it
Kalshi specifically does not want people doing EXACTLY what you and the OP are describing. How diligently do they police it currently? Maybe not at all but the letter of the dev tos prohibits it
Are you 100% certain or have you just never received any kind of notice? Just because you haven't been dinged for it doesn't mean it doesn't violate the tos. Again, having different acct keys on the same VPS necessarily means one party has access to all of them which is a violation
Are you 100% certain or have you just never received any kind of notice? Just because you haven't been dinged for it doesn't mean it doesn't violate the tos. Again, having different acct keys on the same VPS necessarily means one party has access to all of them which is a violation
I think most people realize it's more hassle than it's worth when they dig into it
I think most people realize it's more hassle than it's worth when they dig into it
There are ways to do it above board but generally not really what people have in mind
There are ways to do it above board but generally not really what people have in mind
You can share global signals or logic or market streams, etc. But if you really want to do something like this it's best to have the individual credentials/execution layers live on separate servers owned by the acct holders
You can share global signals or logic or market streams, etc. But if you really want to do something like this it's best to have the individual credentials/execution layers live on separate servers owned by the acct holders
Oh yes forget tos, that is very much illegal
Oh yes forget tos, that is very much illegal
A lot of people come here wanting to build something like this. The general advice is if you don't have special permission from Kalshi you're probably going to end up violating terms somewhere and risk having your acct blocked
A lot of people come here wanting to build something like this. The general advice is if you don't have special permission from Kalshi you're probably going to end up violating terms somewhere and risk having your acct blocked
It'd be pretty tricky to pass the dev tos with that setup. Even with encryption a master admin would have access to everyone's credentials if they all live on the same server
It'd be pretty tricky to pass the dev tos with that setup. Even with encryption a master admin would have access to everyone's credentials if they all live on the same server
I had assumed that was why he was brought on clearly
I had assumed that was why he was brought on clearly
I mean not AUTOMATICALLY but it shouldn't be hard to find the correlaries
I mean not AUTOMATICALLY but it shouldn't be hard to find the correlaries
If the question ever starts with "how does PM..." The answer almost certainly includes the word "illegally"
If the question ever starts with "how does PM..." The answer almost certainly includes the word "illegally"
It may not make a difference for certain strategies but it is bananas to say latency just doesn't matter across the board. It's pretty easy to conceive strats that live and die by 20-50ms latency differences
It may not make a difference for certain strategies but it is bananas to say latency just doesn't matter across the board. It's pretty easy to conceive strats that live and die by 20-50ms latency differences
Are you talking about the v1 credit history endpoint or the UI? I haven't checked that
Are you talking about the v1 credit history endpoint or the UI? I haven't checked that
I'm seeing the same thing. Everything just landing in 0. But that's honestly what I'd expect
I'm seeing the same thing. Everything just landing in 0. But that's honestly what I'd expect
US East
US East
You might have a caching issue since seq gaps are also pretty rare
You might have a caching issue since seq gaps are also pretty rare
That's almost certainly on your end if you're seeing it repeatedly across many markets
That's almost certainly on your end if you're seeing it repeatedly across many markets
Make sure you're monitoring seq values and pulling a new snapshot if there's ever a gap
Make sure you're monitoring seq values and pulling a new snapshot if there's ever a gap
not as a packaged value but all of the data is there to calculate it from orders, fills, and settlements
not as a packaged value but all of the data is there to calculate it from orders, fills, and settlements
I am SOOOOO bored of rate limit talk. If your strats are profitable then build a bankroll and up your volume. If not then keep refining with what you're given
I am SOOOOO bored of rate limit talk. If your strats are profitable then build a bankroll and up your volume. If not then keep refining with what you're given
I don't know how I'd trust it
I don't know how I'd trust it
Unrealized pnl is notoriously unreliable. Best to track it yourself with actual liquidation prices
Unrealized pnl is notoriously unreliable. Best to track it yourself with actual liquidation prices
Might just be regulatory reasons. When in doubt, blame the feds
Might just be regulatory reasons. When in doubt, blame the feds
Well I suspect that's why it doesn't exist in the api to date
Well I suspect that's why it doesn't exist in the api to date
Again this is all sort of mitigated by subaccounts as you can silo funds into a "cash" subaccount and then just initiate the transfers at your leisure. But the external transfers are the only thing I absolutely have to use the web UI for anymore
Again this is all sort of mitigated by subaccounts as you can silo funds into a "cash" subaccount and then just initiate the transfers at your leisure. But the external transfers are the only thing I absolutely have to use the web UI for anymore
If you wanted to rake profits to an external account on a schedule. But even if you didn't want to automate it it would be nice to be able to initiate external transfers from a client side system
If you wanted to rake profits to an external account on a schedule. But even if you didn't want to automate it it would be nice to be able to initiate external transfers from a client side system
V1?
V1?
Love it when I get to block someone new
Love it when I get to block someone new
No
No
Remarkable how similar this all was to what I said
Remarkable how similar this all was to what I said
Don't really like the attitude. Good luck
Don't really like the attitude. Good luck
The broadest possible advice is order_id is your key. Depending on what EXACTLY you're trying to do it will likely require cross referencing feeds based on that
The broadest possible advice is order_id is your key. Depending on what EXACTLY you're trying to do it will likely require cross referencing feeds based on that
Well I don't know what you're asking then. Everyone's usecases are a little specific. You asked about architecture 🤷♂️
Well I don't know what you're asking then. Everyone's usecases are a little specific. You asked about architecture 🤷♂️
But I also cache them all live for high frequency stuff
But I also cache them all live for high frequency stuff
I write all of the portfolio data to PG and use rest to reconcile it regularly
I write all of the portfolio data to PG and use rest to reconcile it regularly
Again I'd just subscribe to all the portfolio feeds, cache/write them as needed and then figure out exactly what you need to track
Again I'd just subscribe to all the portfolio feeds, cache/write them as needed and then figure out exactly what you need to track
You're at the mercy of the race conditions between the portfolio WS feeds. I wouldn't lean on REST for anything but reconciliation
You're at the mercy of the race conditions between the portfolio WS feeds. I wouldn't lean on REST for anything but reconciliation
Subaccounts work well for me in this regard. I have a dedicated cash subaccount that I move funds into to silo them from trading until I get around to making a withdrawal. Same for deposits
Subaccounts work well for me in this regard. I have a dedicated cash subaccount that I move funds into to silo them from trading until I get around to making a withdrawal. Same for deposits
Yeah I've toyed with the same idea but I just don't trust any web automation with that kind of functionality
Yeah I've toyed with the same idea but I just don't trust any web automation with that kind of functionality