Kalshiguess that's how i was thinking of it
guess that's how i was thinking of it
betaclone参与话题 48消息总数 493
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 493 条，显示第 401-450 条but if i have 20 orders it would have to take longer for me to submit each of them with their own http call than to batch them and send them with one
but if i have 20 orders it would have to take longer for me to submit each of them with their own http call than to batch them and send them with one
granted i don't know exactly how batched orders are unpacked on the server side, but i am a little confused how it could possibly be more efficient to send individual HTTP calls on the client side. it would seem to necessarily add latency to the process
granted i don't know exactly how batched orders are unpacked on the server side, but i am a little confused how it could possibly be more efficient to send individual HTTP calls on the client side. it would seem to necessarily add latency to the process
Let's see if it actually works first. I'm a little credulous
Let's see if it actually works first. I'm a little credulous
I'm assuming they'll evolve
I'm assuming they'll evolve
There's still no functionality in the mobile app for them. Transfers default to 0 no matter what sub you're in on the UI
There's still no functionality in the mobile app for them. Transfers default to 0 no matter what sub you're in on the UI
Already complaining?
Already complaining?
Dude we waited like a year for subs. They've been live for 3 weeks
Dude we waited like a year for subs. They've been live for 3 weeks
If you want to move them between subs then yes
If you want to move them between subs then yes
Nah not now. That sh*t is still super basic
Nah not now. That sh*t is still super basic
It's on the UI so it must be stored
It's on the UI so it must be stored
Speaking of which <@1294044400065839177> any chance we might be able to get determination price in the market ticker feeds along with result side?
Speaking of which <@1294044400065839177> any chance we might be able to get determination price in the market ticker feeds along with result side?
The actual market movement is more important and that's consistent across most indeces but if they're giving us a free CFB feed then I'm here for it
The actual market movement is more important and that's consistent across most indeces but if they're giving us a free CFB feed then I'm here for it
I cache the Coinbase feeds and run a 1m avg locally along with my internal metrics. Ive run tests against Kalshi reported floor strikes and UI reported determinations and it's always within a couple thounsdanths of a percent. More than enough margin of error for my strats currently but of COURSE I'd rather be using the official CFB feeds
I cache the Coinbase feeds and run a 1m avg locally along with my internal metrics. Ive run tests against Kalshi reported floor strikes and UI reported determinations and it's always within a couple thounsdanths of a percent. More than enough margin of error for my strats currently but of COURSE I'd rather be using the official CFB feeds
Well that's the law
Well that's the law
User_id is persistent across subaccounts
User_id is persistent across subaccounts
No idea haven't tried but we've been told it's protected against
No idea haven't tried but we've been told it's protected against
No
No
I've always used Coinbase because the CFB license is insanely expensive. Not sure how they'd even be allowed to pass it on but it would be HUGE if it works
I've always used Coinbase because the CFB license is insanely expensive. Not sure how they'd even be allowed to pass it on but it would be HUGE if it works
Know what I'm doing tomorrow
Know what I'm doing tomorrow
Wowowowowowowowow
Wowowowowowowowow
We need a Claude whisperer
We need a Claude whisperer
What are you asking exactly?
What are you asking exactly?
So in that sense if your strat requires resting orders that capital is practically speaking "tied up"
So in that sense if your strat requires resting orders that capital is practically speaking "tied up"
Not in the sense that you can still use the capital (or withdraw it) but don't you have to have the available balance to cover all resting orders?
Not in the sense that you can still use the capital (or withdraw it) but don't you have to have the available balance to cover all resting orders?
I understand why given their capitalization requirements but it would make certain strategies awfully expensive as far as tying up funds. But I guess that's what the interest is for
I understand why given their capitalization requirements but it would make certain strategies awfully expensive as far as tying up funds. But I guess that's what the interest is for
Seems odd that you'd have to tie up your balance in unopened positions
Seems odd that you'd have to tie up your balance in unopened positions
They're supposed to track it and cancel resting orders if your balance drops below the fill levels but I don't know how strict it is
They're supposed to track it and cancel resting orders if your balance drops below the fill levels but I don't know how strict it is
I don't have experience with it personally as I do t tend to have a lot of long term resting orders but it sounds like that's the complication
I don't have experience with it personally as I do t tend to have a lot of long term resting orders but it sounds like that's the complication
If the ask is for a single source of available balance less all resting orders that's a legitimate ask but the answer could simply be you have to do it yourself
If the ask is for a single source of available balance less all resting orders that's a legitimate ask but the answer could simply be you have to do it yourself
Of course and there are ways to do that but there needs to be a blunt "This is how much cash you have" report
Of course and there are ways to do that but there needs to be a blunt "This is how much cash you have" report
No you have $100 available for trading, it will just cancel your resting orders. Your actual cash balance has to be reported somewhere
No you have $100 available for trading, it will just cancel your resting orders. Your actual cash balance has to be reported somewhere
Why would you want your balance to report less your resting orders? I get it might be a bit of a hassle to track the total value of resting orders across different types of markets but your balance is your balance. You can still use it to open positions
Why would you want your balance to report less your resting orders? I get it might be a bit of a hassle to track the total value of resting orders across different types of markets but your balance is your balance. You can still use it to open positions
This is the way it has always actually been on the backend. Yes/no semantics are a skin for casual app users. It took complications to twist the API into those same semantics so they are simplifying the API to match the actual engine. Once you get your head around the shape of it it's actually much more intuitive
This is the way it has always actually been on the backend. Yes/no semantics are a skin for casual app users. It took complications to twist the API into those same semantics so they are simplifying the API to match the actual engine. Once you get your head around the shape of it it's actually much more intuitive
I don't get the hesitancy to switch urls. The v2 migration takes a little work, the URL migration should be as simple as it gets
I don't get the hesitancy to switch urls. The v2 migration takes a little work, the URL migration should be as simple as it gets
But that just forced me to get out of the habit of thinking in yes/no
But that just forced me to get out of the habit of thinking in yes/no
I made a couple slip ups inverting the no prices the first day
I made a couple slip ups inverting the no prices the first day
When I look at my orders tables now I just see bid as yes and ask as no. Just as they intended
When I look at my orders tables now I just see bid as yes and ask as no. Just as they intended
Was greatful they added outcome_side and orderbook_side Action was always moot for me because I was always a buy
Was greatful they added outcome_side and orderbook_side Action was always moot for me because I was always a buy
I stopped tracking them weeks ago
I stopped tracking them weeks ago
I've never touched RFQs. I was just commenting on how often they came up in the channel
I've never touched RFQs. I was just commenting on how often they came up in the channel
Simple find/replace
Simple find/replace
They'll probably start throttling them soon
They'll probably start throttling them soon
I think the elections urls are still fine for v2 but there's no reason not to switch those over too
I think the elections urls are still fine for v2 but there's no reason not to switch those over too
Thing is 1 contract testing is just as misleading as paper trading. No clue how larger orders would behave
Thing is 1 contract testing is just as misleading as paper trading. No clue how larger orders would behave
Subaccounts have been great for that
Subaccounts have been great for that
But I also do plenty of 1 contract live testing
But I also do plenty of 1 contract live testing
There's no such thing as a 100% accurate paper system but I spent the time so I could try to sim out the behavior as accurately as possible
There's no such thing as a 100% accurate paper system but I spent the time so I could try to sim out the behavior as accurately as possible
I have a couple strats that back in March were getting a few hundred entries a day. The past 6 weeks some of them barely get 4 or 5. The market catches up
I have a couple strats that back in March were getting a few hundred entries a day. The past 6 weeks some of them barely get 4 or 5. The market catches up
I'm always throwing new strats at the wall. I spent months building a proper paper trading system
I'm always throwing new strats at the wall. I spent months building a proper paper trading system