PolymarketIs this the actual vote now? or is it from before? Not familiar with UMA tbh
Is this the actual vote now? or is it from before? Not familiar with UMA tbh
DataRules参与话题 0消息总数 13
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 13 条，显示第 1-13 条Degens if this resolves 50/50 or yes take some profits off the table and don't feed it all back into the trenches
Degens if this resolves 50/50 or yes take some profits off the table and don't feed it all back into the trenches
Fair point, but poly is worth billions, this shit is chicken feed for them lol
Fair point, but poly is worth billions, this shit is chicken feed for them lol
No matter how you look at this, if Polymarket doesn't do something about this it will be a PR disaster. Brand image matters here....Mexc gave both yes and no $1, ez good PR to gain a few thousand new clients. I think that's why degens are piling in on yes, also it could very well be UMA whales with hundreds of accounts buying yes to resolve that way, I mean wouldn't you? lol
No matter how you look at this, if Polymarket doesn't do something about this it will be a PR disaster. Brand image matters here....Mexc gave both yes and no $1, ez good PR to gain a few thousand new clients. I think that's why degens are piling in on yes, also it could very well be UMA whales with hundreds of accounts buying yes to resolve that way, I mean wouldn't you? lol
Boys, Mexc resolved this bet to Yes for both, no cap ''Regarding the prediction event “Will MicroStrategy sell any Bitcoin by ___?”, MEXC acknowledges that users on both the YES and NO sides have different views regarding the final outcome. After carefully reviewing user feedback and conducting further internal assessment, MEXC has decided to apply a user-friendly resolution to this disputed event by treating both YES and NO positions as settled at 1. Specifically, YES positions will be settled directly at 1, while users holding NO positions will receive equivalent compensation as if their NO positions were also settled at 1. At MEXC, we believe fairness matters. We are willing to take additional responsibility to reflect our respect for community feedback, our commitment to handling disputed outcomes fairly, and our long-term goal of building a more transparent and user-friendly Prediction Market platform. MicroStrategy report: https://strategy.com/purchases MEXC Prediction Market: https://prediction.mexc.com/prediction-markets''
Boys, Mexc resolved this bet to Yes for both, no cap ''Regarding the prediction event “Will MicroStrategy sell any Bitcoin by ___?”, MEXC acknowledges that users on both the YES and NO sides have different views regarding the final outcome. After carefully reviewing user feedback and conducting further internal assessment, MEXC has decided to apply a user-friendly resolution to this disputed event by treating both YES and NO positions as settled at 1. Specifically, YES positions will be settled directly at 1, while users holding NO positions will receive equivalent compensation as if their NO positions were also settled at 1. At MEXC, we believe fairness matters. We are willing to take additional responsibility to reflect our respect for community feedback, our commitment to handling disputed outcomes fairly, and our long-term goal of building a more transparent and user-friendly Prediction Market platform. MicroStrategy report: https://strategy.com/purchases MEXC Prediction Market: https://prediction.mexc.com/prediction-markets''
I'm saying UMA resolving against poly clarification
I'm saying UMA resolving against poly clarification
Ty ser
Ty ser
What's the tweeter handle?
What's the tweeter handle?
The Ukrainian president suit was one of those, but you have Google yourself so ez to find out
The Ukrainian president suit was one of those, but you have Google yourself so ez to find out
There's been times where UMA has voted against polys clarification
There's been times where UMA has voted against polys clarification
Even if this resolves 50/50 most yes holders will eat gud
Even if this resolves 50/50 most yes holders will eat gud
That's the thing, it's the factual reality vs the cut off date...no one knew the wallets that sold until the bet closed
That's the thing, it's the factual reality vs the cut off date...no one knew the wallets that sold until the bet closed
It's a cheap dice roll for a potential 100x. If UMA resolves to Yes many degens gmi
It's a cheap dice roll for a potential 100x. If UMA resolves to Yes many degens gmi