Polymarketwhats the eta on lebanon - israel diplo meeting refunds?
whats the eta on lebanon - israel diplo meeting refunds?
Padda参与话题 8消息总数 110
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 110 条，显示第 1-50 条Is that real
Is that real
Why does it say 1 mil
Why does it say 1 mil
strike markets only went yes if Netanyahu himself carried out the strike
strike markets only went yes if Netanyahu himself carried out the strike
I’m joking
I’m joking
It’s a general rule on poly
It’s a general rule on poly
Nothing written in Arabic qualifies
Nothing written in Arabic qualifies
I have no alts
I have no alts
Me?
Me?
I’ll get you setup overseas I’ll get you a new family a nice place
I’ll get you setup overseas I’ll get you a new family a nice place
In ways you couldn’t even imagine
In ways you couldn’t even imagine
Zorro show me what you have and one day I will repay you
Zorro show me what you have and one day I will repay you
But was he right in the end?
But was he right in the end?
Zorro is such a chad
Zorro is such a chad
we are all trading on Zorro's confidence
we are all trading on Zorro's confidence
i spent 4 hours scouring the web and found nothing that qualifies
i spent 4 hours scouring the web and found nothing that qualifies
no not based on that, if you look at the rest of the speech, its unclear but he could be / is probably reffering to calls held in may about operation freedom
no not based on that, if you look at the rest of the speech, its unclear but he could be / is probably reffering to calls held in may about operation freedom
only if its allowed
only if its allowed
is that allowed?
is that allowed?
and i deem it qualifying
and i deem it qualifying
i will compensate if you send to me
i will compensate if you send to me
does anyone have a qualifying yes thing besides Zorro
does anyone have a qualifying yes thing besides Zorro
i found it
i found it
June 17, G7 speech: "We had a very good meeting, actually. The Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim, who's -- I tell you, I wish I could really know the guy. You know, some people say, well, he lived in that neighborhood. I can't -- you can't be -- you can't be saying things that you'd like to have him say. He was fantastic on this and he's -- he's been fantastic guy, in terms of energy and getting energy out there. President of the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Zayed, who's an amazing warrior. President El-Sisi of Egypt. Prime Minister Modi of India, we spent a long time together today. I spoke to Mohammed. I spoke to the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia a number of times. They're all so happy that this deal -- you have to have them happy too, you know?"
June 17, G7 speech: "We had a very good meeting, actually. The Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim, who's -- I tell you, I wish I could really know the guy. You know, some people say, well, he lived in that neighborhood. I can't -- you can't be -- you can't be saying things that you'd like to have him say. He was fantastic on this and he's -- he's been fantastic guy, in terms of energy and getting energy out there. President of the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Zayed, who's an amazing warrior. President El-Sisi of Egypt. Prime Minister Modi of India, we spent a long time together today. I spoke to Mohammed. I spoke to the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia a number of times. They're all so happy that this deal -- you have to have them happy too, you know?"
wait i found it
wait i found it
what a sly devil
what a sly devil
hes fucking with us lol
hes fucking with us lol
hello are we getting refunds for lost positions on the Israel - Lebanon meeting markets that were posted as Neg-risk? i bet about 5k across the two earlier strikes because they seemed super underpriced before i realizes it was neg-risk
hello are we getting refunds for lost positions on the Israel - Lebanon meeting markets that were posted as Neg-risk? i bet about 5k across the two earlier strikes because they seemed super underpriced before i realizes it was neg-risk
Can someone fill my order here
Can someone fill my order here
https://polymarket.com/event/nick-fuentes-and-sophie-rain-confirmed-relationship-by-september-30-20260626180930298
https://polymarket.com/event/nick-fuentes-and-sophie-rain-confirmed-relationship-by-september-30-20260626180930298
lol
lol
could still go no
could still go no
yeah im going to bed
yeah im going to bed
Rainless your trolling 😂
Rainless your trolling 😂
yeah thats fair
yeah thats fair
your his minion
your his minion
denizz has groupies
denizz has groupies
because in practice they havent agreed to withdraw troops
because in practice they havent agreed to withdraw troops
both yes and no have valid points. I think spirit of market is NO
both yes and no have valid points. I think spirit of market is NO
I just think the rules stress that it needs to be "definitive," AKA agreed upon when the MOU is signed as part of the MOU, not conditional on other demands being met or a dintinct different deal being signed
I just think the rules stress that it needs to be "definitive," AKA agreed upon when the MOU is signed as part of the MOU, not conditional on other demands being met or a dintinct different deal being signed
The MOU has promises on sanctions relief and assets but not on troop withdrawal
The MOU has promises on sanctions relief and assets but not on troop withdrawal
nobody is agreeing to a final nuclear deal
nobody is agreeing to a final nuclear deal
its not at all its agrremnt to "60 days of negotations"
its not at all its agrremnt to "60 days of negotations"
its conditional on a seperate deal its not even on this one
its conditional on a seperate deal its not even on this one
its about a totally seperate deal
its about a totally seperate deal
the thing is its not conditional on anything in this deal
the thing is its not conditional on anything in this deal
the rules clearly outline that conditional is excluded even if they dont state it plainly
the rules clearly outline that conditional is excluded even if they dont state it plainly
if the withdrawal was part of the MOU and it was contingent on something that iran already agreed to as part of the MOU then i would say its a Yes but its contingent on a seperate deal getting made that needs to be negotiated and that nobody has agreed or commited to so its No
if the withdrawal was part of the MOU and it was contingent on something that iran already agreed to as part of the MOU then i would say its a Yes but its contingent on a seperate deal getting made that needs to be negotiated and that nobody has agreed or commited to so its No
Its very specifically seperated out as part of a future final deal which may or may not occur. It is not part of the MOU's terms
Its very specifically seperated out as part of a future final deal which may or may not occur. It is not part of the MOU's terms
Agreement refers to an explicit acceptance, authorization or consent to the specified action. Only announcements of definitive agreement will qualify. Suggestions, negotiations, expressions of openness, or other non-definitive statements will not qualify. [[negotiations and expressions of opennes do not qualify]] - so something that is conditional upon a speculative future deal is not agreed on and is more like a negotiation
Agreement refers to an explicit acceptance, authorization or consent to the specified action. Only announcements of definitive agreement will qualify. Suggestions, negotiations, expressions of openness, or other non-definitive statements will not qualify. [[negotiations and expressions of opennes do not qualify]] - so something that is conditional upon a speculative future deal is not agreed on and is more like a negotiation
第 1 / 3 页
下一页 →